Why this Site?

  • Our Mission:
  • We exist to shine the light of scrutiny into the dark crevices of Wikipedia and its related projects; to examine the corruption there, along with its structural flaws; and to inoculate the unsuspecting public against the torrent of misinformation, defamation, and general nonsense that issues forth from one of the world’s most frequently visited websites, the “encyclopedia that anyone can edit.”
  • How you can participate:
  •  Visit the Wikipediocracy Forum, a candid exchange of views between Wikipedia editors, administrators, critics, proponents, and the general public.
  • 'Like' our Wikipediocracy page on Facebook.
  •  Follow Wikipediocracy on Twitter!

"Requiring editors to use or link to their real identities would mean the immediate exit of me+many editors like me" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_ta…

Forum Feed

- Ming

Ming thinks a more accurate article would have said that "Wikipedia is one you want to avoid be [...]

- Outsider

Captain Occam wrote:Doesn't COI only matter when the material being added is non-neutral?Define [...]

- Outsider

Smiley wrote:Or like me, you could just have an embarrassing surname with "cock" in it.. Y [...]

- eppur si muove

Peter Damian wrote:Scott5114 wrote:Peter Damian wrote:You seem to be suggesting that the process of [...]

- Peter Damian

In the context of the other thread about admin status I was Googling 'servant leadership', [...]

Press Releases

  • Please click here for recent Wikipediocracy press releases.

Why Jim Hawkins’ Treatment Matters

By Dan Murphy

Jim Hawkins is a regionally well-known radio host on the BBC, based in Shropshire. He’s a fairly popular guy in his community, and clearly a broadcast pro (I listened to 10 minutes of his show from a few days ago. Show wasn’t for me, but he clearly knows his business). I suspect, like most people in his trade, he’s made a lot of charity appearances, attended events that are meaningful (horse races or holiday galas or whatever) to his local community, and done a bit to promote his show. More than most of his age and background, he’s also embraced social media (mostly Twitter) as a way to engage his audience. What this means from a Wikipedia perspective is that he’s a “public figure” who has generated sufficient “reliable sources” to justify writing a biography about him.

He’s also been unhappy about the presence of his biography on Wikipedia (the 5th hit

…continue reading Why Jim Hawkins’ Treatment Matters