A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

Arnnon Geshuri eats some of Wikipedia’s Dog Food

by Some_clever_pseudonym_here

By now, you’ve probably heard the name Arnnon Geshuri. Geshuri was recently appointed to the Wikimedia Foundation’s Board of Directors for a two-year term. The WMF made that announcement on January 5th. If you had looked up Arnnon Geshuri on Wikipedia on that day, you would have found no mention of him at all. Now, thanks to Wikipedia’s dedicated editors, his slightly unflattering Wikipedia article comes up first in Google searches.

Crowdsourced After The Fact Due Diligence
Very soon after the announcement of Geshuri’s appointment, people began to question his role in a major Silicon Valley scandal. One veteran editor laid out a fairly damning case against Geshuri. A discussion was started on Jimmy Wales’ talk page.

Meanwhile, former Wikimedia UK Trustee Mike Peel decided it was time for Geshuri to have a Wikipedia biography. After all, he was now a member of the WMF Board, right? Even that early one-paragraph version contains reference to Geshuri’s involvement in what Wikipedia calls the High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation case.

There was a brief and fruitless effort by MZMcBride to redirect the biography to the existing article about the WMF board. As McBride stated on the article’s talk page, “when I searched Wikipedia itself for any mentions of Arnnon Geshuri, he had none anywhere.” Clearly if someone is not mentioned on Wikipedia, they are not notable enough for Wikipedia. Other editors persuaded McBride to wait, since the story was still developing.

The Workers Are Revolting
Possibly because Geshuri’s appointment came so soon after James Heilman was dismissed from the board, Geshuri was not treated well on Wikipedia. The single sentence about his involvement in the non-poaching scheme became a paragraph. And then its own “Controversy” section. Even before Geshuri finally saw the writing on the wall and stepped down from the WMF board, the “Controversy” section became “Controversies” as the story progressed.

When Ashley van Haeften organized a symbolic “no confidence” vote, an editor tried to add a link to the vote. Why wait for reliable sources to write about something if you already know it’s important?

The Inevitable Clean Up
After a couple of weeks with his biography prominently highlighting his two greatest failures, Geshuri is being given a break. Mike Peel has returned to “clean up” the article. There is no longer a “Controversies” section. The two paragraphs about the controversies have been collapsed into one and merged with the “Career” section. This is probably how it will remain. Now that he has resigned from the board, I imagine that Wikipedia editors have about as much interest in Geshuri as he has in Wikipedia. It was fun while it lasted, wasn’t it Arnnon?

Wiki doctor voted off the island

The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees voted on December 28 to remove one of its own members, Dr. James Heilman, from their ranks. Heilman, an emergency room physician from western Canada, had been appointed to the non-profit board only as recently as June 2015, with the backing of more than a thousand “votes” from the Wikipedia community of editors.

…continue reading Wiki doctor voted off the island




The Bra-men of Wikipedia Revisited

Editor Btphelps on Wikipedia waits out the publicity… and then shapes the supple contents of the Bra article to meet his desires.

…continue reading The Bra-men of Wikipedia Revisited