Search found 14 matches
- Tue Jul 05, 2022 4:39 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Another attempt to fix RfA
- Replies: 223
- Views: 15879
- Sun Jul 03, 2022 8:34 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Another attempt to fix RfA
- Replies: 223
- Views: 15879
Re: Another attempt to fix RfA
Regardless, if the figure is true, to me, it suggests something I'm surprised to be typing here: Maybe there isn't a problem with administration on Wikipedia, or at least not a cultural/systemic rot-level one. I mean, if 99% of admins are never brought to ArbCom, it suggests they're at least perfor...
- Sat Jul 02, 2022 11:08 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Another attempt to fix RfA
- Replies: 223
- Views: 15879
Re: WP:AARGH !
If there was a real problem to be solved, it wouldn't be this difficult for someone to pipe up and describe it. I don't really want to get drawn into this, but I thought that the idea was to separate review of admin actions from the general boards requesting admin attention, and to introduce AE-sty...
- Sat Jul 02, 2022 9:18 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Another attempt to fix RfA
- Replies: 223
- Views: 15879
Re: Another attempt to fix RfA
But asking "what problem does it fix" seems too unimaginative. "What problem does it fix?" seems to me to be a splendid question. How on earth will you define and build the "solution" if you can't "imagine" the "problem" it is supposed to fix? And why on earth would you invest this amount of your o...
- Fri Jul 01, 2022 9:59 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Arbcom case: Conduct in Deletion Discussions
- Replies: 403
- Views: 39914
- Tue Jun 28, 2022 5:56 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Undetected vandalism
- Replies: 207
- Views: 71590
Re: Undetected vandalism
I'm sorry, I thought this was a place where people come to troll WP editors. I didn't realize it was [CENSORED].
- Mon Jun 27, 2022 6:48 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Undetected vandalism
- Replies: 207
- Views: 71590
Re: Undetected vandalism
Sorry for perpetuating this sidebar but I just wanted to note that there are three formally state-recognized American Indian tribes of Georgia but apparently none of them are federally recognized . Only about half a percent of Georgians are natives (a figure that's actually higher than recent previ...
- Mon Jun 27, 2022 4:07 am
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Undetected vandalism
- Replies: 207
- Views: 71590
- Mon Jun 27, 2022 3:35 am
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Undetected vandalism
- Replies: 207
- Views: 71590
Re: Undetected vandalism
Wikipedia should avoid stating opinions in Wiki-voice. A fact would be that so-and-so said that Greene was "far-right", attributing the opinion to a person or organization who stated that opinion. Hey, genius. That's what those little numbers are for on Wikipedia articles. When you see a little num...
- Mon Jun 27, 2022 3:30 am
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Undetected vandalism
- Replies: 207
- Views: 71590
Re: Undetected vandalism
Sorry to drag this out longer but why can there be “broad consensus” on the borders of continents (or individual countries, for that matter) but not on what constitutes far-right politics or a far-right politician? Is requiring all members to vote either “yes” or “no” on every question before the H...
- Mon Jun 27, 2022 3:26 am
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Undetected vandalism
- Replies: 207
- Views: 71590
Re: Undetected vandalism
Sorry to drag this out longer but why can there be “broad consensus” on the borders of continents (or individual countries, for that matter) but not on what constitutes far-right politics or a far-right politician? There is broad consensus on what constitutes far-right politics or far-right politic...
- Sat Jun 25, 2022 2:15 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Arbcom case: Conduct in Deletion Discussions
- Replies: 403
- Views: 39914
Re: Arbcom case: Conduct in Deletion Discussions
Let's not forget that admin and once-Arb JClemens wrote a BLP policy-flaunting essay to be weaponized in XfDs... Wikipedia:CRYBLP once-admin and once-Arb Jclemens pre-emptively resigned the bit after being hauled to Arbcom for too forcefully using his admin rights to save a precious article ( Henry...
- Fri Jun 24, 2022 1:19 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: RFB - Lee Vilenski
- Replies: 50
- Views: 3764
Re: RFB - Lee Vilenski
Do we need 'crats at all? What risk or harm would be caused by allowing regular old admins to close RFAs and give out bot flags?Beeblebrox wrote: ↑Wed Jun 08, 2022 6:11 pmI love that the first and so far only oppose is "we don't need more 'crats". What a great, well reasoned oppose.
- Thu Jun 23, 2022 11:42 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Arbcom case: Conduct in Deletion Discussions
- Replies: 403
- Views: 39914
Re: Arbcom case: Conduct in Deletion Discussions
I found this website in the first place via similar accusations. It's amusing to me how the very people who most object to what goes on here seem to be the most eager to provide direct-links that the out-of-the-poop readers can use to find it. Hi, I found this website from S Marshall's link at Arbc...