Why this Site?

  • Our Mission:
  • We exist to shine the light of scrutiny into the dark crevices of Wikipedia and its related projects; to examine the corruption there, along with its structural flaws; and to inoculate the unsuspecting public against the torrent of misinformation, defamation, and general nonsense that issues forth from one of the world’s most frequently visited websites, the “encyclopedia that anyone can edit.”
  • How you can participate:
  •  Visit the Wikipediocracy Forum, a candid exchange of views between Wikipedia editors, administrators, critics, proponents, and the general public.
  • 'Like' our Wikipediocracy page on Facebook.
  •  Follow Wikipediocracy on Twitter!

Press Releases

  • Please click here for recent Wikipediocracy press releases.

Google Search

Wikipedia Loves (Stolen) Art

By Hemia U. Chenia (and the Wikipediocracy Blog Staff)

Christian Rosa (courtesy of Wikimedia Commons; image uploaded by User:Panghea)

In 2016 a Wikipedia entry for contemporary artist Christian Rosa was created by a new user called Panghea. It was quickly nominated for deletion, but the discussion resulted in “no consensus,” so the article remained. Panghea sporadically updated Rosa’s page over the next few years, making no edits to any other article, and Rosa’s art was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons by Panghea, who claimed it was their “own work.”Born in Brazil in 1982, Rosa’s fame reached its zenith in 2014 when one of his paintings sold at Christie’s in New York for $209,000. His star soon dimmed, however, and a similar artwork made only $30,000 a year later.In January 2021, Artnet News claimed Rosa stole a partially completed painting from fellow artist Raymond Pettibon. Rosa allegedly forged the unfinished part and consigned it to the secondary art market as the owner. A subsequent Artnet exposé suggested that Rosa had stolen and forged multiple paintings from Pettibon’s workshop.An unregistered user added these allegations to Rosa’s Wikipedia article, cited to Artnet. Less than two hours later though, Panghea swooped in and removed them entirely, leaving a misleading comment of “minor edit.”The allegations eventually found their way back into Rosa’s article several months later, courtesy of occasional editor Forsooth1234. Panghea again removed all mention of the scandal, with another misleading edit summary: “Minor edit + incl. sculptures.” The claims were then added back in again by an anonymous IP editor and Forsooth1234, but were repeatedly removed by Panghea, who claimed the additions were “libelous.” That started an edit war that resulted in the article being

…continue reading Wikipedia Loves (Stolen) Art

Wikipedia’s struggles with harassment and criticism: past and present

by Kingsindian

Introduction Early in October, Buzzfeed published a expose, titled “Here’s How Breitbart And Milo Smuggled Nazi and White Nationalist Ideas Into The Mainstream”, based on leaked emails of Milo Yiannapoulos, a former writer for Breitbart News.

Milo Yiannopoulos

Milo YiannopoulosImage Credit: KmeronLicense: CC BY 2.0

The story is long and complicated and covers lots of areas. Among the revelations in the story were some email exchanges between Yiannopoulos and journalists in the “liberal media” which Breitbart News frequently rails against. Some of the emails exchanged between Yiannopoulos and David Auerbach, then a journalist at Slate, were about governance issues at Wikipedia. Auerbach has broadly denied Buzzfeed’s claims, saying: “Inasmuch as the story concerns me, it is utter bullshit”.

The story which follows spans several areas including harassment, politics, anonymity, and the nature of online discourse. Like in the Buzzfeed story, one theme connecting many of these areas is a long-running and ever-evolving saga called Gamergate, which started in mid-2014. The issues discussed here go beyond Wikipedia and affect the lives, politics, and culture in the “real world” as well. While we will touch on the real-world issues as appropriate, our focus will be on how these issues affect and are affected by, the mechanisms and personalities on Wikipedia.

…continue reading Wikipedia’s struggles with harassment and criticism: past and present

What can fact checkers learn from Wikipedia — How not to do things, perhaps?

Wikipedia editor Kingsindian looks at the loose relationship between Wikipedia’s self-image and its reality, then examines the process by which articles are created.

…continue reading What can fact checkers learn from Wikipedia — How not to do things, perhaps?