by Roger Hogsky
UPDATE: There has been a response to this story from the Wikimedia Foundation, which is reproduced at the bottom of this piece.
Many businesses and organizations operate their offices from a central Internet connection that establishes just one IP address for all of its employees (and visitors) to use. However, by doing so, it can lead to situations where one employee or one visitor is up to no good on the Internet, leaving behind the IP address breadcrumbs that incriminate the whole organization.
You would think that an advanced technology juggernaut like the Wikimedia Foundation would be very careful and secure about how it allocates its publicly-viewable IP addresses to employees and visitors to their headquarters, but perhaps this is not the case. Let’s juxtapose some activities taking place within or regarding the Wikimedia Foundation, on some particular days in recent history, shall we now?
April 2, 2008: Wikimedia Foundation board chairperson Florence Devouard asks the WMF lead attorney Mike Godwin:
Let’s say… if the board was to decide on a dual governance between a “board of trustees” and a “program council”, what would the legal comment you would provide ?
Same day, over on Wikipedia, from the Wikimedia Foundation’s IP address, regarding the Bean (T–H–L) article:
They have a very distinct taste to them. They kind of resemble the smell of cat litter. They are really dark green like a crayon.
July 5, 2010: Wikimedia Foundation dignitary, Samuel Klein, discusses prioritization of spending:
I agree we should have specific goals for resources, both short- and long-term. The reason to allocate a fund for long-term infrastructure support, is to avoid
…continue reading Busy day at the Wikimedia Foundation office?