Why this Site?

  • Our Mission:
  • We exist to shine the light of scrutiny into the dark crevices of Wikipedia and its related projects; to examine the corruption there, along with its structural flaws; and to inoculate the unsuspecting public against the torrent of misinformation, defamation, and general nonsense that issues forth from one of the world’s most frequently visited websites, the “encyclopedia that anyone can edit.”
  • How you can participate:
  •  Visit the Wikipediocracy Forum, a candid exchange of views between Wikipedia editors, administrators, critics, proponents, and the general public.
  • 'Like' our Wikipediocracy page on Facebook.
  •  Follow Wikipediocracy on Twitter!

"Requiring editors to use or link to their real identities would mean the immediate exit of me+many editors like me" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_ta…

Forum Feed

- Ming

Ming thinks a more accurate article would have said that "Wikipedia is one you want to avoid be [...]

- Outsider

Captain Occam wrote:Doesn't COI only matter when the material being added is non-neutral?Define [...]

- Outsider

Smiley wrote:Or like me, you could just have an embarrassing surname with "cock" in it.. Y [...]

- eppur si muove

Peter Damian wrote:Scott5114 wrote:Peter Damian wrote:You seem to be suggesting that the process of [...]

- Peter Damian

In the context of the other thread about admin status I was Googling 'servant leadership', [...]

Press Releases

  • Please click here for recent Wikipediocracy press releases.

The Duck Test

By Hersch

Duck What is the point of having The Encylopedia That Not Just Anyone Can Edit? Well, to make money, of course, somewhere down the line. But for the Wikipedians who toil day in and day out, with no hope of remuneration, there is another kind of reward: the satisfaction of knowing that one’s personal set of prejudices, or what is known at Wikipedia as one’s Point of View (POV), has become the dominant one on a given set of articles. Once an editor has ascended high enough in the pecking order, becoming one of Wikipedia’s leading peckers, he or she may hope to have his or her prejudices incorporated into the “House POV,” where they will be enshrined informally in Wikipedia Policy and protected against all outsiders.

How does one define the “House POV”? Well, it’s like porn. As U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice

…continue reading The Duck Test