I guess that would include about half of Arbcom, then.EricBarbour wrote:Mathsci and Russavia owe me an apology. Plain and simple.
They're going down the same stupid road that Will Beback tried in 2009.
And just in case of oversight, here is what Prioryman posted on that thread which was "redacted".::: Matt, I don't believe it's justifiable to ban people simply because they participate in the Fuckwit Forum. On the other hand, it does serve a useful purpose in red-flagging that whatever they say is here most likely (a) pointless (b) trollish (c) dickish (d) stupid or (e) some combination of (a) to (d). Think of it as a filter, if you like. [[User:Prioryman|Prioryman]] ([[User talk:Prioryman|talk]]) 21:33, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Jimbo calls for revolution on commons
- Zoloft
- Trustee
- Posts: 14081
- kołdry
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:54 pm
- Wikipedia User: Stanistani
- Wikipedia Review Member: Zoloft
- Actual Name: William Burns
- Nom de plume: William Burns
- Location: San Diego
- Contact:
Re: Jimbo calls for revolution on commons
My avatar is sometimes indicative of my mood:
- Actual mug ◄
- Uncle Cornpone
- Zoloft bouncy pill-thing
-
- Posts: 10891
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:32 pm
- Location: hell
Re: Jimbo calls for revolution on commons
So, no apology, eh?
- DanMurphy
- Habitué
- Posts: 3153
- Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:58 pm
- Wikipedia User: Dan Murphy
- Wikipedia Review Member: DanMurphy
Re: Jimbo calls for revolution on commons
Definitely NSFW. A .gif of a man masturbating is the first hit at commons when you search for "one stroke."
Apparently, an external website auto-generated a link to this search in an article on the malady, without knowing what it led to:
Apparently, an external website auto-generated a link to this search in an article on the malady, without knowing what it led to:
Hi, an issue was recently brought to my attention, and I'm curious if you see a way to address it within Commons policy. I'm sure you're familiar with the "toothbrush" search issue; this is similar. The first result for this search, which an external site has linked as part of its information about stroke (the medical condition), is a bit of a shock to most viewers. I thought I'd ask you because you're the only person who's put this image anywhere, and because I know you have a lot of experience managing files that involve nudity and sexuality. It seems to me that we would do better in fulfilling our educational mission if people could search our site for a word like "stroke" with reasonable confidence that they would not run into something that would surprise or offend them. I know that addressing that general principle is a big and complex issue, but do you think there is anything to be done about this particular instance? -Pete F (talk) 18:47, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Vigilant
- Sonny, I've got a whole theme park full of red delights for you.
- Posts: 31776
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:16 pm
- Wikipedia User: Vigilant
- Wikipedia Review Member: Vigilant
Re: Jimbo calls for revolution on commons
This is why we must never implement, nor allow anyone to implement, a google search style safesearch option.
WP:NOTCENSORED!!
Like is like a box of commons, you never know what PENIS you're gonna get.
WP:NOTCENSORED!!
Like is like a box of commons, you never know what PENIS you're gonna get.
Hello, John. John, hello. You're the one soul I would come up here to collect myself.
- plix tixiplik
- Contributor
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 3:40 pm
Re: Jimbo calls for revolution on commons
Going by 76.126.142.59's posts on Jimbo Wales' talk page, it's the irrepressible Mbz1. Comcast ISP in San Francisco and trolling in broken English is a give-away.
- TungstenCarbide
- Habitué
- Posts: 2592
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:51 am
- Wikipedia User: TungstenCarbide
- Wikipedia Review Member: TungstenCarbide
Re: Jimbo calls for revolution on commons
what strikes me there is not the image, but that PeteF brought this up with Mattbuck. PeteF is politically astute, doesn't get into fights, and is undoubtedly aware of the Commons 'culture'. He's also an insider who makes his living as a Wikipedia consultant (i think), so he's careful not to rock the boat. I wonder if he's gotten yelled at by one of his customers, and perhaps sensed shifting political currents and wants to be at the forefront.DanMurphy wrote:Definitely NSFW. A .gif of a man masturbating is the first hit at commons when you search for "one stroke."
Apparently, an external website auto-generated a link to this search in an article on the malady, without knowing what it led to:
Hi, an issue was recently brought to my attention, and I'm curious if you see a way to address it within Commons policy. I'm sure you're familiar with the "toothbrush" search issue; this is similar. The first result for this search, which an external site has linked as part of its information about stroke (the medical condition), is a bit of a shock to most viewers. I thought I'd ask you because you're the only person who's put this image anywhere, and because I know you have a lot of experience managing files that involve nudity and sexuality. It seems to me that we would do better in fulfilling our educational mission if people could search our site for a word like "stroke" with reasonable confidence that they would not run into something that would surprise or offend them. I know that addressing that general principle is a big and complex issue, but do you think there is anything to be done about this particular instance? -Pete F (talk) 18:47, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Gone hiking. also, beware of women with crazy head gear and a dagger.
- DanMurphy
- Habitué
- Posts: 3153
- Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:58 pm
- Wikipedia User: Dan Murphy
- Wikipedia Review Member: DanMurphy
Re: Jimbo calls for revolution on commons
Scott Bibby remains an avid reader of our little website and has a solution.DanMurphy wrote:Definitely NSFW. A .gif of a man masturbating is the first hit at commons when you search for "one stroke."
Apparently, an external website auto-generated a link to this search in an article on the malady, without knowing what it led to:
Hi, an issue was recently brought to my attention, and I'm curious if you see a way to address it within Commons policy. I'm sure you're familiar with the "toothbrush" search issue; this is similar. The first result for this search, which an external site has linked as part of its information about stroke (the medical condition), is a bit of a shock to most viewers. I thought I'd ask you because you're the only person who's put this image anywhere, and because I know you have a lot of experience managing files that involve nudity and sexuality. It seems to me that we would do better in fulfilling our educational mission if people could search our site for a word like "stroke" with reasonable confidence that they would not run into something that would surprise or offend them. I know that addressing that general principle is a big and complex issue, but do you think there is anything to be done about this particular instance? -Pete F (talk) 18:47, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Male masturbation.gif
I think this is an absolutely useless file. If it were an ogg video with full length, great, but what we have here is a 0.2 sec gif of some guy jacking off which gives us nothing that is above and beyond what we already have. There's nothing educational in it at all. I think we need to look at the rest of our GIF files too, because given our video capability, they are somewhat redundant. russavia (talk) 20:23, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Keep - While I understand what you mean, I don't think I agree. Let's face it, male masturbation is just 0.5s of action repeated over and over and over... -mattbuck (Talk) 20:51, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Maybe for you it is Mattbuck. I am sure if you peruse the rest of our collection here on Commons, you might be able to spice that 0.5s into something more varied and interesting. russavia (talk) 20:59, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Ghost In The Machine
- Contributor
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:52 am
- Wikipedia User: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
- Wikipedia Review Member: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
- Location: From "That Other Site"
Re: Jimbo calls for revolution on commons
More like a counter revolution against those who have flouted the lil tin god king's authoritah.Vigilant wrote:Pretty remarkable.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit ... =554951112He's promulgating an invasion of commons by non-insane people who would just take over.I think no area of the entire Wikimedia movement would benefit more from easier participation than commons. The solution is to overwhelm the people who aren't doing their jobs there with people who will. That's not something I'm in a position personally to achieve, though.--[[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo Wales]]
Sounds like a cybernetic version of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict.
Good times.
And, as usual, the grand poltroon is leading it from behind.
Know thyself...at least once a day.
- Bielle
- Gregarious
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 6:35 pm
- Wikipedia User: Bielle
- Wikipedia Review Member: Bielle
Re: Jimbo calls for revolution on commons
I think that's the first time any of the Commons penis cabal has admitted that Commons is a stroke book. Russavia does appear to be on a kamikazi mission.Keep - While I understand what you mean, I don't think I agree. Let's face it, male masturbation is just 0.5s of action repeated over and over and over... -mattbuck (Talk) 20:51, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Maybe for you it is Mattbuck. I am sure if you peruse the rest of our collection here on Commons, you might be able to spice that 0.5s into something more varied and interesting. russavia (talk) 20:59, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- thekohser
- Majordomo
- Posts: 13410
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 5:07 pm
- Wikipedia User: Thekohser
- Wikipedia Review Member: thekohser
- Actual Name: Gregory Kohs
- Location: United States
- Contact:
Re: Jimbo calls for revolution on commons
No, didn't you get the news? All Comcast ISP users in San Francisco are Eric Barbour, even though he doesn't live in San Francisco, and (I think) he doesn't subscribe to Comcast. Russavia has made this clear.plix tixiplik wrote:Comcast ISP in San Francisco and trolling in broken English is a give-away.
"...making nonsensical connections and culminating in feigned surprise, since 2006..."
Re: Jimbo calls for revolution on commons
AlisonAlison wrote:I can see Eric's IP addresses on here for the last few months and guess what - that IP isn't in there. Wrong location, wrong ISP, etc, etc ...
You know as well as I do that you can't prove a negative with Checkuser. How often do suspect sockpuppets ask for a checkuser to prove their innocence? How often have you agreed to such a request? I very much doubt that it is Eric, but having different IPs in itself proves nothing.
- Vigilant
- Sonny, I've got a whole theme park full of red delights for you.
- Posts: 31776
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:16 pm
- Wikipedia User: Vigilant
- Wikipedia Review Member: Vigilant
Re: Jimbo calls for revolution on commons
I'm Eric Barbour.
Hello, John. John, hello. You're the one soul I would come up here to collect myself.
-
- Posts: 10891
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:32 pm
- Location: hell
Re: Jimbo calls for revolution on commons
Russavia is a stupid piece of shit. If he had bothered to do a little checking, he'd learn that I live in Lake County, not San Francisco;thekohser wrote:No, didn't you get the news? All Comcast ISP users in San Francisco are Eric Barbour, even though he doesn't live in San Francisco, and (I think) he doesn't subscribe to Comcast. Russavia has made this clear.
that Comcast service (cable TV, internet, whatever) is NOT available anywhere in Lake County; and my real, current IP address has
never been blocked. Partly because it was also used in the past, by one ItosLemma (T-C-L), an editor in good standing whose
identity is unknown to me. Because sonic.net reassigned it in 2012. They do that occasionally, understand?
Russavia owes me an apology. And Mathsci still owes me one, because he's claimed to have apologized, yet I never saw it anywhere.
- thekohser
- Majordomo
- Posts: 13410
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 5:07 pm
- Wikipedia User: Thekohser
- Wikipedia Review Member: thekohser
- Actual Name: Gregory Kohs
- Location: United States
- Contact:
Re: Jimbo calls for revolution on commons
Speaking of Klashorst, apparently someone thought it would increase world knowledge by adding one of his ridiculous photos (NSFW) to a Russian Wikinews (who knew there was such a thing?) article documenting an interesting Middle Eastern survey of how people think Muslim women should dress.Vigilant wrote: Photographs by Peter Klashorst
Jimbo's reaction, to his credit, is right and proper:
Russavia and Odder have to be behind this comic spectacle somehow, right?It is ludicrous and wrong, and likely racist. Nothing can justify it.
"...making nonsensical connections and culminating in feigned surprise, since 2006..."
- The Devil's Advocate
- Habitué
- Posts: 1910
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 12:19 am
- Wikipedia User: The Devil's Advocate
Re: Jimbo calls for revolution on commons
The person who added it is apparently the one who created the article, Krassotkin (T-C-L).
"For those who stubbornly seek freedom around the world, there can be no more urgent task than to come to understand the mechanisms and practices of indoctrination."
- Noam Chomsky
- Jim
- Blue Meanie
- Posts: 4955
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:33 am
- Wikipedia User: Begoon
- Wikipedia Review Member: Jim
- Location: NSW
Re: Jimbo calls for revolution on commons
Oh, I dunno, Jimmy - if you were searching for a dyed-in-the-wool apologist, eager to run around at Russavia's whim and excuse such stuff, I might be able to steer you in the right direction... I'd even waive the finder's fee just for the entertainment.thekohser wrote:the jimbo wrote:Nothing can justify it.
Re: Jimbo calls for revolution on commons
Russavia trolls Jimmy on his commons talk page.thekohser wrote:Speaking of Klashorst, apparently someone thought it would increase world knowledge by adding one of his ridiculous photos (NSFW) to a Russian Wikinews (who knew there was such a thing?) article documenting an interesting Middle Eastern survey of how people think Muslim women should dress.Vigilant wrote: Photographs by Peter Klashorst
Jimbo's reaction, to his credit, is right and proper:Russavia and Odder have to be behind this comic spectacle somehow, right?It is ludicrous and wrong, and likely racist. Nothing can justify it.
- Clipperton
- Contributor
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2013 9:31 am
Re: Jimbo calls for revolution on commons
Posting for the record, to the most topical thread I could find based on the now infamous 'toothbrush' keyword:
Searching for 'pants' gives at least 2 or 3 adult images on the first page of results.
As you were.
Searching for 'pants' gives at least 2 or 3 adult images on the first page of results.
As you were.
Last edited by Clipperton on Tue May 06, 2014 1:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Zoloft
- Trustee
- Posts: 14081
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:54 pm
- Wikipedia User: Stanistani
- Wikipedia Review Member: Zoloft
- Actual Name: William Burns
- Nom de plume: William Burns
- Location: San Diego
- Contact:
Re: Jimbo calls for revolution on commons
"Necklace" does as well. The thing is riddled with innapropriate 'results.'Clipperton wrote:Posting for the record, to the most topical thread I could find based on the now infamous 'toothbrush' keyword:
'Searching for 'pants' gives at least 2 or 3 adult images on the first page of results.
Edit: I correct myself. Recent additions have pushed the secondary sexual characteristics and display of gametes past the first 100 results.
Bravo.
My avatar is sometimes indicative of my mood:
- Actual mug ◄
- Uncle Cornpone
- Zoloft bouncy pill-thing
- Clipperton
- Contributor
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2013 9:31 am
Re: Jimbo calls for revolution on commons
Eek. OK!Zoloft wrote:"Necklace" does as well. The thing is riddled with innapropriate 'results.'