Hog Farm RFA
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 86
- kołdry
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 1:07 am
- Wikipedia Review Member: Park Young Sam
- Location: Busan ,South Korea
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2019 8:29 pm
Re: Hog Farm RFA
Another one of those edit-hoarding WP:ADMINSOCK (T-H-L)s that know all the rules from day 1.
How do they come up with these names? Is it a 14 year old?
How do they come up with these names? Is it a 14 year old?
Well, no surprise there...a fantastic editor, who has very quickly become one of the best contributors
-
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
Re: Hog Farm RFA
Nominated by Lee Vilenski (T-C-L), an admin and apparently "one of the 2,000 most active English Wikipedians of all time". Co-nominated by Eddie891 (T-C-L) who, with refreshing honesty, says on his user page "As an admin, I'm still learning the ropes, so please don't hesitate to leave a message on my talk page when I mess up".
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1402
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 2:16 pm
- Location: with cheese.
Re: Hog Farm RFA
Usual Boi admin wannabe. I do Note that SoWhy has Provided some opposable material-Regardless of HF's apologies, Etc., he was basically Fucking Up as recently As last May and potentially Driving away Productive New editors.
"Someone requests clarification and before you know it you find yourself in the Star Chamber."
-
- Critic
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2020 1:27 am
- Wikipedia User: Moneytrees
- Location: Getting shaded under....
Re: Hog Farm RFA
Please stop calling people “Boi”. You’re far too old to be talking like that.
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1402
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 2:16 pm
- Location: with cheese.
Re: Hog Farm RFA
You're far too young to be listening.
Moderator's note: Apparently, the term "boi" is often used as a mild pejorative within the LGBT community, which might suggest that its use within the context of a Wikipedia RfA (barring self-identification as such by the candidate) would be inappropriate. Members are therefore requested to use the conventional spelling of the word "boy" unless circumstances clearly demand otherwise.
Moderator's note: Apparently, the term "boi" is often used as a mild pejorative within the LGBT community, which might suggest that its use within the context of a Wikipedia RfA (barring self-identification as such by the candidate) would be inappropriate. Members are therefore requested to use the conventional spelling of the word "boy" unless circumstances clearly demand otherwise.
"Someone requests clarification and before you know it you find yourself in the Star Chamber."
-
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
Re: Hog Farm RFA
SoWhy is now supporting him. So far it's 46/0/0, and given how few oppose votes there have been lately to most RfAs, I predict a very smooth ride.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1402
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 2:16 pm
- Location: with cheese.
Re: Hog Farm RFA
How many times have you voted?
"Someone requests clarification and before you know it you find yourself in the Star Chamber."
-
- the Merciless
- Posts: 2999
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 1:35 pm
Re: Hog Farm RFA
Ming is a little surprised that there isn't opposition based on his participation in the GNIS cleanup deletion-fest.
-
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
Re: Hog Farm RFA
He doesn't need my support. He's already at 76/0/0.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1402
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 2:16 pm
- Location: with cheese.
Re: Hog Farm RFA
Apologies for my Insensitivity. I will Address them by the Proper title.C&B wrote: ↑Thu Jan 14, 2021 9:26 pmModerator's note: Apparently, the term "boi" is often used as a mild pejorative within the LGBT community, which might suggest that its use within the context of a Wikipedia RfA (barring self-identification as such by the candidate) would be inappropriate. Members are therefore requested to use the conventional spelling of the word "boy" unless circumstances clearly demand otherwise.
Leslie: Dumbass.
Gablehauser: Dr Winkle, you will address Dr Cooper by his proper title.
Leslie: Dr Dumbass.
"Someone requests clarification and before you know it you find yourself in the Star Chamber."
-
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
Re: Hog Farm RFA
And there is an oppose.
I doubt that Hog Farm will lose much sleep over that.Weak Oppose - You don't quite pass my criteria. Sorry. Foxnpichu (talk) 15:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Is this simply due to the length of tenure for the user, Foxnpichu? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:39, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9966
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:10 pm
- Wikipedia Review Member: Somey
Re: Hog Farm RFA
Has anyone stopped to consider that this whole thing might just be an elaborate trolling effort? I mean, there's now going to be the potential for news-media coverage of a high-visibility "vandalism" attempt that will contain the sentence, "the account was quickly blocked by the Wikipedia Administrator Hog Farm."
Are there any other admins with names like that? I could see some embarrassment potential with "Audacity," "Bongwarrior," or "Magog the Ogre," and of course there's always some minor-confusion potential with "Cleared as filed," "Edit filter," "Hut 8.5," "Neutrality," or even "Y." But I don't believe there are currently any admins on the English Wikipedia with a name that would be quite as self-deprecatory as "Hog Farm," if decontextualized and/or used in something similar to the aforementioned sentence construction.
Are there any other admins with names like that? I could see some embarrassment potential with "Audacity," "Bongwarrior," or "Magog the Ogre," and of course there's always some minor-confusion potential with "Cleared as filed," "Edit filter," "Hut 8.5," "Neutrality," or even "Y." But I don't believe there are currently any admins on the English Wikipedia with a name that would be quite as self-deprecatory as "Hog Farm," if decontextualized and/or used in something similar to the aforementioned sentence construction.
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2019 8:29 pm
Re: Hog Farm RFA
Good point.Midsize Jake wrote: ↑Fri Jan 15, 2021 8:14 pmHas anyone stopped to consider that this whole thing might just be an elaborate trolling effort? I mean, there's now going to be the potential for news-media coverage of a high-visibility "vandalism" attempt that will contain the sentence, "the account was quickly blocked by the Wikipedia Administrator Hog Farm."
There are. What I found in common with the owners of such names (not the ones you listed) is that they think and behave like a child, yet they are taken seriously within admin circles. What does that tell about admins...Midsize Jake wrote: ↑Fri Jan 15, 2021 8:14 pmAre there any other admins with names like that? I could see some embarrassment potential with ...
-
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
Re: Hog Farm RFA
I expect that these people with especially silly names start out as jokers, but become hooked and turn into serious editors (or, rather, game players since this is Wikipedia). They forget how silly their names are.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
-
- Gregarious
- Posts: 572
- Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 5:24 am
- Wikipedia User: David J Wilson (no longer active); Freda Nurk
- Wikipedia Review Member: lonza leggiera
- Actual Name: David Wilson
Re: Hog Farm RFA
Unfortunately there appears to be no hope that user Haemorrhoids (T-C-L) could ever become an admin.Midsize Jake wrote: ↑Fri Jan 15, 2021 8:14 pmHas anyone stopped to consider that this whole thing might just be an elaborate trolling effort? I mean, there's now going to be the potential for news-media coverage of a high-visibility "vandalism" attempt that will contain the sentence, "the account was quickly blocked by the Wikipedia Administrator Hog Farm."
Are there any other admins with names like that? I could see some embarrassment potential with "Audacity," "Bongwarrior," or "Magog the Ogre," and of course there's always some minor-confusion potential with "Cleared as filed," "Edit filter," "Hut 8.5," "Neutrality," or even "Y." But I don't believe there are currently any admins on the English Wikipedia with a name that would be quite as self-deprecatory as "Hog Farm," if decontextualized and/or used in something similar to the aforementioned sentence construction.
E voi, piuttosto che le nostre povere gabbane d'istrioni, le nostr' anime considerate. Perchè siam uomini di carne ed ossa, e di quest' orfano mondo, al pari di voi, spiriamo l'aere.
-
- the Merciless
- Posts: 2999
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 1:35 pm
Re: Hog Farm RFA
Ming realizes that it is de rigeur to heap random calumnies on any RfA nomination, is there any real reason to think this fellow will be doing a bad job?
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9966
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:10 pm
- Wikipedia Review Member: Somey
Re: Hog Farm RFA
On the contrary — if I'm right, he'll go out of his way to do a really good job, especially on high-visibility incidents, in order to increase the likelihood that someone from a reputable media outlet will publish a "Wikipedia Administrator Hog Farm" reference.
-
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
Re: Hog Farm RFA
As he only ever made one edit, many years ago, that seems a safe bet. Can someone create a sock called "Painful haemorrhoids" and get it through RfA?lonza leggiera wrote: ↑Fri Jan 15, 2021 9:29 pmUnfortunately there appears to be no hope that user Haemorrhoids (T-C-L) could ever become an admin.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
-
- the Merciless
- Posts: 2999
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 1:35 pm
Re: Hog Farm RFA
You would have better luck with "Gomers Piles".Poetlister wrote: ↑Sat Jan 16, 2021 10:17 amAs he only ever made one edit, many years ago, that seems a safe bet. Can someone create a sock called "Painful haemorrhoids" and get it through RfA?lonza leggiera wrote: ↑Fri Jan 15, 2021 9:29 pmUnfortunately there appears to be no hope that user Haemorrhoids (T-C-L) could ever become an admin.
-
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
Re: Hog Farm RFA
Opposition grows, although at 121/3/0 he seems secure. I have sympathy with these oppose remarks.
Oppose. Sorry to spoil the party, but I take a stronger view than the questioner about the answers to question 8. Anyone who just a few months ago prioritised pushing to get their quota of speedy deletion nominations over the integrity of the encyclopedia should not become an admin. For the record I do not support Foxnpichu's oppose above, as it seems to be based on arbitrary numbers rather than trust. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Oppose, reluctantly. Candidate meets my minimums and I was going to support with a comment that the zeal in deletions was apparently a miscommunication and a desire to meet established norms. But, what nagged at my mind, if the candidate was fully ready to be an administrator - they should have known that a quota of deletions would be anathema to most editors. Ifnord (talk) 16:16, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
-
- the Merciless
- Posts: 2999
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 1:35 pm
Re: Hog Farm RFA
If memory serves Ming, Bridger is one of those who has tried to stop the anti-GNIS crusade.Poetlister wrote: ↑Sat Jan 16, 2021 5:38 pmOpposition grows, although at 121/3/0 he seems secure. I have sympathy with these oppose remarks.Oppose. Sorry to spoil the party, but I take a stronger view than the questioner about the answers to question 8. Anyone who just a few months ago prioritised pushing to get their quota of speedy deletion nominations over the integrity of the encyclopedia should not become an admin. For the record I do not support Foxnpichu's oppose above, as it seems to be based on arbitrary numbers rather than trust. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Oppose, reluctantly. Candidate meets my minimums and I was going to support with a comment that the zeal in deletions was apparently a miscommunication and a desire to meet established norms. But, what nagged at my mind, if the candidate was fully ready to be an administrator - they should have known that a quota of deletions would be anathema to most editors. Ifnord (talk) 16:16, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
Re: Hog Farm RFA
Definitely the anti-deletionists don't like him. But if the issue is whether to have an article on every place name or alleged place name in the world, I'm on his side.
Oppose: Too eager to remove valuable contributions from Wikipedia. Deletion is sometimes necessary (best example would be copyright violations), but admins should be builders, not breakers. Mysterymanblue 17:57, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Oppose per Phil Bridger. I'm troubled by the focus on quotas over notability. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 21:02, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2019 8:29 pm
Re: Hog Farm RFA
Clearly, he cares only about the admin powers. Predictably we'll have a few threads a year from now about how he abused it. It's a textbook play.
-
- Critic
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 5:59 pm
- Actual Name: Tristan
Re: Hog Farm RFA
I voted oppose and I’m crafting another oppose vote atm. Waiting for the right time to drop it, hopefully prompt a pile on.
-
- Gregarious
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 4:20 pm
- Wikipedia User: Ritchie333
- Location: London, broadly construed
-
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
Re: Hog Farm RFA
It would be incredibly difficult to get enough of a pile-on to make any difference. Yes, there is some dissent (138/5/2), but not enough to worry him.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1402
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 2:16 pm
- Location: with cheese.
Re: Hog Farm RFA
I do so Hope that you 'craft' a better Oppose than you have Already ('admins should be builders, not breakers'). While the Other Opposes are as Equally irrelevant: yours is A blatant Policy Misunderstanding. Admin tools are Not there for Content work, and demanding Inclusionism flies in the face of WP:INVOLVED.
Both your socks will be More laundered than the Pope's pocket Money
"Someone requests clarification and before you know it you find yourself in the Star Chamber."
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1402
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 2:16 pm
- Location: with cheese.
Re: Hog Farm RFA
C'mon you lot, Own Up are you really going to Get Away with this?!
The Hubris is Great in this one, 10 edits, mostly to User Talk Space?
Mind you if In The Name of the God 'Good Faith' they Let the vote stand, Then frankly, they deserve Everything they get
The Hubris is Great in this one, 10 edits, mostly to User Talk Space?
Mind you if In The Name of the God 'Good Faith' they Let the vote stand, Then frankly, they deserve Everything they get
"Someone requests clarification and before you know it you find yourself in the Star Chamber."
-
- Critic
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2015 4:31 pm
- Wikipedia User: DC
Re: Hog Farm RFA
I know nothing about this candidate, but shouldn't it be a bit concerning that he got 90 support votes before someone even bothered to give a half-assed oppose? I know RFA is seen as a gauntlet these days and new nominations are almost stagnant, but that doesn't mean voters should pass everyone with a pulse.
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2019 8:29 pm
Re: Hog Farm RFA
He's a professional. Even before he registered, he knew the secret recipe to become admin in the least amout of time (barely more than a year). One can wonder how many admin accounts he already has.Wikiguy.DC wrote: ↑Mon Jan 18, 2021 4:57 pmI know nothing about this candidate, but shouldn't it be a bit concerning that he got 90 support votes before someone even bothered to give a half-assed oppose?
Is it the fault of the voters to not see behind the facade? Not really. Some voters probably know what's going on, the rest only cares that he's a well-trained soldier. One that won't cause any trouble within the admin ranks.Wikiguy.DC wrote: ↑Mon Jan 18, 2021 4:57 pmI know RFA is seen as a gauntlet these days and new nominations are almost stagnant, but that doesn't mean voters should pass everyone with a pulse.
WP:Wikipedia is an MMORPG (T-H-L)
-
- the Merciless
- Posts: 2999
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 1:35 pm
Re: Hog Farm RFA
Really, if one could get the Dramuh out of the picture, any reasonably competent writer/editor could be given admin tools within a year.
-
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
Re: Hog Farm RFA
This chap's very dubious. Only on the site a couple of days and already voting in an RfA? It should be struck out. Still, at 159/9/2 one vote either way makes no difference.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2019 8:29 pm
Re: Hog Farm RFA
The vote doesn't matter. The chap should be checkusered, might reveal its sock-master.Poetlister wrote: ↑Mon Jan 18, 2021 6:59 pmThis chap's very dubious. Only on the site a couple of days and already voting in an RfA? It should be struck out. Still, at 159/9/2 one vote either way makes no difference.
-
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
Re: Hog Farm RFA
Indeed. Where is Bbb23 (T-C-L) when you need him? (He hasn't disappeared; he does edit occasionally.) Still, as we all know, it's easy enough to circumvent a checkuser.Osborne wrote: ↑Mon Jan 18, 2021 7:14 pmThe vote doesn't matter. The chap should be checkusered, might reveal its sock-master.Poetlister wrote: ↑Mon Jan 18, 2021 6:59 pmThis chap's very dubious. Only on the site a couple of days and already voting in an RfA? It should be struck out. Still, at 159/9/2 one vote either way makes no difference.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2019 8:29 pm
-
- Gregarious
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:27 am
Re: Hog Farm RFA
RfA's are now automatically announced at the top of everyone's watchlist, which leads some new editors to find them much earlier than they otherwise might.
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2019 8:29 pm
Re: Hog Farm RFA
And we also assume that a brand new editor with 10 edits will have the necessary understanding of WP to review the candidate's 10,000 edits and he will do that at least superficially to be able to say in good conscience that "I don't see any problems."Newyorkbrad wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 3:18 amRfA's are now automatically announced at the top of everyone's watchlist, which leads some new editors to find them much earlier than they otherwise might.
Yeah, nah. Applying Occam's razor reveals this is an old editor in a new garb, but he does serve the admin clique, so let's give the benefit of doubt without limits. If necessary add the standard defense: edited as an IP for a long time...
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 1:07 am
- Wikipedia Review Member: Park Young Sam
- Location: Busan ,South Korea
Re: Hog Farm RFA
Does appear to love deletions only 5% Keep votes: 25 (5.1%)
link
link
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2019 8:29 pm
Re: Hog Farm RFA
There's a trend caused by human nature: new editors want to add to the encyclopedia, old editors want to clean up.rhinoroars wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 8:40 pmDoes appear to love deletions only 5% Keep votes: 25 (5.1%)
link
-
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
Re: Hog Farm RFA
As well as those 25 there is one speedy keep and ten merge (i.e. keep the material, just put it somewhere else). Still, yes, overwhelmingly he votes to delete. But maybe he was justified on most of those occasions. There is no shortage of articles on Wikipedia that should be deleted, and many of them have survived AfDs.rhinoroars wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 8:40 pmDoes appear to love deletions only 5% Keep votes: 25 (5.1%)
link
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1402
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 2:16 pm
- Location: with cheese.
Re: Hog Farm RFA
Where WO leads, The Floquenbeam does follow
"Someone requests clarification and before you know it you find yourself in the Star Chamber."
-
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
Re: Hog Farm RFA
The 100th support came from SandyGeorgia. I don't know if she carries as much clout as she used to. Is "I hope he will use the tools sparingly" actually an endorsement?
Support What has most impressed me about Hog Farm is not his extensive contributions to top quality articles, nor his willingness to help others, nor how quickly he learns, nor that he anticipates needs and fills in wherever needed. All of that is exemplary, but it is that he listens and adjusts positions as he hears and learns. I hope he will use the tools sparingly, and stay involved in content review processes, where his assistance has become invaluable. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1402
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 2:16 pm
- Location: with cheese.
Re: Hog Farm RFA
I think Not, except in the MedRes and FA projects, And they're Pretty Niche.Poetlister wrote: ↑Wed Jan 20, 2021 10:43 amThe 100th support came from SandyGeorgia. I don't know if she carries as much clout as she used to.
Dammed with Faint Praise, what what!Poetlister wrote: ↑Wed Jan 20, 2021 10:43 amIs "I hope he will use the tools sparingly" actually an endorsement?
"Someone requests clarification and before you know it you find yourself in the Star Chamber."
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2019 8:29 pm
Re: Hog Farm RFA
Support of an abuser after admonished... noted.Floq wrote:I wish Bbb23 was still a CU.
I wish there were CUs besides Bbb. Oh, wait...
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1402
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 2:16 pm
- Location: with cheese.
Re: Hog Farm RFA
The silence, of Course, is deafening From others... someone said Something the Same in the last rfa, I think, and was immediately Crushed by the Anti-Fishermen
A hypocrisy, of course, And so Obvious. I suppose each Rfa is a kind of Schrodinger's cat Where Everything does start all over again and No rfa sets some Precedent for the next.
A hypocrisy, of course, And so Obvious. I suppose each Rfa is a kind of Schrodinger's cat Where Everything does start all over again and No rfa sets some Precedent for the next.
"Someone requests clarification and before you know it you find yourself in the Star Chamber."
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1402
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 2:16 pm
- Location: with cheese.
Re: Hog Farm RFA
Why doesn't he go for CU Then?!
"Someone requests clarification and before you know it you find yourself in the Star Chamber."
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1402
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 2:16 pm
- Location: with cheese.
Re: Hog Farm RFA
Well, As We approach close of play, there Have Indeed been two Dumbass such opposes... any sign of That pile on? Anyone?
Bueller? Bueller?
"Someone requests clarification and before you know it you find yourself in the Star Chamber."
-
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
Re: Hog Farm RFA
Hands up who wants Floquenbeam to be a CU. Anyone?
Still, yes, there are a few CUs around. It's a lot of work, but it needs to be done.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1402
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 2:16 pm
- Location: with cheese.
Re: Hog Farm RFA
ST47 (T-C-L) has taken over From Bbb23 as the Maniacal Kalashnikova of checkuserehn. He is Brusque, but not actually a rude Ignorant fuck like the Other. (Yet, anyway: It looks like He only really came back to the CU bit after Bbb23 had been Emasculated, So there is, Doubtless, still time for Him to let the Power corrupt...)
"Someone requests clarification and before you know it you find yourself in the Star Chamber."