My own viewpoint is on the PD talk page.
Shorter version: Hijiri was screwed from the very beginning when two different cases were joined together (Hijiri-Catflap and Hijiri-CurtisNaito/TH1980) which have no connection whatsoever except that Hijiri was involved in them. It is basically a version of naming the case after a person, which as we all know, is the kiss of death.
Hijiri made a very big mistake by stating on the evidence page that they will only deal with the former case. So basically all the evidence in the latter case was presented with no rebuttal.
Here is my verdict:
- I know nothing about the Catflap dispute, so I will pass over it in silence.
- TH1980 is a know nothing or perhaps a "good-faith but clueless editor", who is hounding Hijiri (the latter part is accepted by everyone including ArbCom).
- CurtisNaito is a good-faith but incompetent editor who misreads sources and engages in WP:IDHT (T-H-L) behaviour when challenged. Virtually all of the interactions involving them degenerate into walls of text. Virtually every editor who has looked into their sourcing and writing has flagged numerous problems.
- Hijiri is an editor with a very sharp tongue who does not suffer fools gladly.
- ArbCom's practice of not even bothering to look into content is once again proven to be disastrous.
- The "civility" and "no personal attacks" policy are again proven to be disastrous.