The Devil's Advocate wrote:One vote left and it is a go on the case. Pretty clear what they have in mind:
I think there are several people here whose behavior is due (or well overdue) for a review, and I don't think that is going to happen any other way at this point. Seraphimblade
I'm more than happy to take a case reviewing the behaviour of people not here to build an encyclopedia. Several names here qualify. Accept. AGK
What's more important is that it's the same old names appearing again and again. I'd be willing to accept a case with the strict scope of looking at the behaviour of a small number of people. WormTT
I think it's time to review the actions of some of the people named here. Accept. GorillaWarfare
This is going to be all about taking "Hell in a Bucket" and Tarc to task. May the wikigods have mercy on their souls.
Mr. Bucket pissed all over NY Brad's talk page recently, which was not the brightest move in a series of his not-so-bright moves. He was a dead man walking if ArbCom took the Malleus Is Really Uncivil Sometimes case (which they did not). If they take the Greg Kohs Really Knows How To Get People's Goat Sometimes case, just watch 'em work that into the evidence somehow...
I've pretty much assumed for about a day now that they're gonna take this case, which I would never have predicted... It's pretty small potatoes and shouldn't take too long, but then again, once things hit ArbCom it's sort of like throwing a couple of those little Expando-Sponge capsules into a swimming pool — Itty bitty can become elephantine pretty rapidly... The resulting sponges you end up tossing in the garbage can because they are useless, of course.
I've listed myself as a party in the proposed case since I'm arrogant enough to think that I have a rational solution for the actual problem at hand. If Mr. Kohs wants to say something in respect to this case, which is ostensibly about him, I hope he avails himself of the opportunity which my self-inflicted status might present.
RfB
