Theredpenofdoom strikes again
- Ca$hBag
- Critic
- Posts: 249
- kołdry
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:55 am
- Wikipedia User: Multiple users; proudly in violation of WP:SOCK
- Wikipedia Review Member: Ca$hBag
Theredpenofdoom strikes again
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... dPenOfDoom
And as usual everyone sides with him. It can't be just me that sees his username giving out what his sole purpose on wikipedia is.
And as usual everyone sides with him. It can't be just me that sees his username giving out what his sole purpose on wikipedia is.
-
- Critic
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 11:52 am
Re: Theredpenofdoom strikes again
"TheRedPenOfDoom is blunt but a very knowledgeable and capable editor. If he is removing sections, odds are very good that policy is on his side when removing it"Ca$hBag wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... dPenOfDoom
And as usual everyone sides with him. It can't be just me that sees his username giving out what his sole purpose on wikipedia is.
"this looks like a content dispute"
"this appears to be a content dispute...attracting TheRedPenofDoom's attention can be an unpleasant experience, but in these matters he is typically right. Material needs sources, and your opinions about what constitute "sporadic" or "late" require citations to support your characterizations"
You are probably right here.
- Poetlister
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
- Contact:
Re: Theredpenofdoom strikes again
There's a lot to be said for an editor who goes around removing unsourced or poorly sourced rubbish. Of course, too much of a good thing can be damaging, if said editor doesn't know a reliable source when he sees one.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
Re: Theredpenofdoom strikes again
He edit warred to try to keep pejorative, mis-sourced information about a BLP subject in the article. If WP's administration had it's shite together, this guy/girl would have been banned long ago.Poetlister wrote:There's a lot to be said for an editor who goes around removing unsourced or poorly sourced rubbish. Of course, too much of a good thing can be damaging, if said editor doesn't know a reliable source when he sees one.
Re: Theredpenofdoom strikes again
He certainly loves to remove stuff. The Eastern University article followed the shell of WikiProject:Universities, but he managed to prune it back severely: link
-
- Posts: 10891
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:32 pm
- Location: hell
Re: Theredpenofdoom strikes again
He is a very good Wiki-lawyer and an accomplished troll. I'll let you decide whether his background is Indian, it seems likely due to all the editwars over bios of Indian politicians, academic figures etc. and his shaky English writing skills, indicating it is a second language. He was also deeply involved in the Rupert Sheldrake article, and was restricted from editing it last December. Despite all that, he's never been blocked, so he must have a number of administrator friends. They keep erasing his userpage, a dead giveaway.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit ... on=history
Here are some obvious items about him. There are many more.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... dPenOfDoom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... dPenOfDoom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... dPenOfDoom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... dPenOfDoom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... _action.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... dPenOfDoom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... ual_deaths
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... _novio_.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... eclined.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... otected.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... dPenOfDoom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... dPenOfDoom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... t:_semi.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... otected.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... _Warned.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... dPenOfDoom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... dPenOfDoom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... olation.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... olation.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit ... on=history
Here are some obvious items about him. There are many more.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... dPenOfDoom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... dPenOfDoom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... dPenOfDoom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... dPenOfDoom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... _action.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... dPenOfDoom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... ual_deaths
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... _novio_.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... eclined.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... otected.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... dPenOfDoom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... dPenOfDoom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... t:_semi.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... otected.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... _Warned.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... dPenOfDoom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... dPenOfDoom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... olation.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... olation.29
- Poetlister
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
- Contact:
Re: Theredpenofdoom strikes again
Never was your photo of a snoozing Jimbo at the end of a post more apt.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
- Ca$hBag
- Critic
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:55 am
- Wikipedia User: Multiple users; proudly in violation of WP:SOCK
- Wikipedia Review Member: Ca$hBag
Re: Theredpenofdoom strikes again
I found some interesting things about him on this site critical of wikipedia: http://wikipediawehaveaproblem.com/evid ... nd-admins/
Re: Theredpenofdoom strikes again
You could also call him Joey Joe Joe Junior Shabadoo.
Though Joey Joe Joe Junior Shabadoo (T-C-L) (who "retired" one week before TheRedPenOfDoom was created) is obviously not his first account.
Though Joey Joe Joe Junior Shabadoo (T-C-L) (who "retired" one week before TheRedPenOfDoom was created) is obviously not his first account.
-
- Posts: 10891
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:32 pm
- Location: hell
Re: Theredpenofdoom strikes again
Someone's a comedian:tarantino wrote:You could also call him Joey Joe Joe Junior Shabadoo.
Though Joey Joe Joe Junior Shabadoo (T-C-L) (who "retired" one week before TheRedPenOfDoom was created) is obviously not his first account.
Yes, "Joey Jo-Jo" is a very minor Simpsons character. How typical.Springfield (The Simpsons) (redirect from Joey Joe Joe Junior Shabadoo)
Re: Theredpenofdoom strikes again
Elsewhere on that page:Ca$hBag wrote:I found some interesting things about him on this site critical of wikipedia: http://wikipediawehaveaproblem.com/evid ... nd-admins/
http://wikipediawehaveaproblem.com/evidence-of-cyberbullying-wp-editors-and-admins/#name-irwolfie
http://tools.wmflabs.org/supercount/ind ... .wikipedia
- Ca$hBag
- Critic
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:55 am
- Wikipedia User: Multiple users; proudly in violation of WP:SOCK
- Wikipedia Review Member: Ca$hBag
Re: Theredpenofdoom strikes again
Thanks, I'll tag him when the time is right. In case you need to learn how to do it just put {{sockpuppet|Joey Joe Joe Junior Shabadoo}}tarantino wrote:You could also call him Joey Joe Joe Junior Shabadoo.
Though Joey Joe Joe Junior Shabadoo (T-C-L) (who "retired" one week before TheRedPenOfDoom was created) is obviously not his first account.
If I do it now my socks may be exposed.
- Midsize Jake
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9951
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:10 pm
- Wikipedia Review Member: Somey
Re: Theredpenofdoom strikes again
Can't you just keep your pants and your shoes on?Ca$hBag wrote:If I do it now my socks may be exposed.
- Ca$hBag
- Critic
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:55 am
- Wikipedia User: Multiple users; proudly in violation of WP:SOCK
- Wikipedia Review Member: Ca$hBag
Re: Theredpenofdoom strikes again
It's funny alright but right now i don't get the metaphore. By the way putting it on the asses user page is no good since it's been delted. better to put it on the top of his talkpage.Midsize Jake wrote: Can't you just keep your pants and your shoes on?