What seems to have happened, however, is that this simple idea got co-opted in two ways. WP became a focus instead of a tool, and people saw that they could advance their own goals through this project.
The first is amply demonstrated on Monmouthpedia's website (on the page Monmouthpedia – so what’s in it for local businesses?) with pictures of a bakery door with QR codes. What do those QR codes link to? Bread, cake, flour, and baker's yeast. That isn't about the history and culture of Monmouth or even about the bakery, that's about WP.
The second -- the one that leads to the future issues -- is evident in the efforts of PR consultant Steve Virgin, who until the recent election was a WMUK Trustee. Look at this post on his blog "Monmouthpedia – a small step for the PR industry on a longer road to deeper understanding of Wikipedia" (subtitled "How to turn a crisis into an opportunity for the PR industry"). The last paragraph is particularly telling.
Note how well this ties in to Roger Bamkin's statement on his LinkedIn page that he has "been involved with QRpedia and Monmouthpedia which have delivered > £2m paybeack on £50K investment". That "return" is the estimated value of the free PR. This is what Bamkin, Virgin, et al are selling. Of course, there is a limited amount of press interest in such stories (which has probably been filled by Monmouthpedia and Gibraltarpedia), but that won't stop other towns and cities from buying into the idea based on the successes of the earlier projects. The 5th "Wikipedia town" probably won't even be noticed outside of local press.The Monmouthpedia initiative involved a number of PRCA member agencies who produced some fabulous communication support. With agencies such as Montpellier PR behind the Wikimedia UK communications team, the press campaign saw 277 news stories across 36 countries and created immense value to the town of Monmouth and to the technological innovation-driven notion of hyper-localism using multi-lingual Wikipedia pages.
In early May 2012, WMUK posted draft "best practice guidelines for PR" on its website. It was authored by the "Chartered Institute of Public Relations social media advisory panel". Days later, there was a presentation by two PR professionals at the WMUK AGM. According to the announcement on the PRCA site, "Wikimedia UK are also working with PR member agency Montpelier PR, and their CEO Guy Woodcock -a PRCA Board Member -on the ‘Monmouthpedia’ Wikipedia project". The WMUK seems very chummy with the PR industry, but I suppose if one is selling press coverage to town councils, one has to be.