Two more global bans
Re: Two more global bans
Do they provide any explanation for why the ban is applied? I see there are only 19 people (accounts) to have reached this lofty status of being ostracized worldwide
Explosive Chemistry!
Re: Two more global bans
I'm pretty sure they never explain why a person is banned to anybody outside of staff.milowent wrote:
Do they provide any explanation for why the ban is applied? I see there are only 19 people (accounts) to have reached this lofty status of being ostracized worldwide
- Zoloft
- Trustee
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:54 pm
- Wikipedia User: Stanistani
- Wikipedia Review Member: Zoloft
- Actual Name: William Burns
- Nom de plume: William Burns
- Location: San Diego
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
Greg was probably banned because, like the sun coming up every day - whether you want it to or not - he is an eternal verity.
My avatar is sometimes indicative of my mood:
- Actual mug ◄
- Uncle Cornpone
- Zoloft bouncy pill-thing
Re: Two more global bans
So a Wall of Shame that lumps a noted Wikipedia critic alongside degenerate slime like Beta and Demiurge. Surely that was unintentional.
"The world needs bad men. We keep the other bad men from the door."
- thekohser
- Majordomo
- Posts: 13410
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 5:07 pm
- Wikipedia User: Thekohser
- Wikipedia Review Member: thekohser
- Actual Name: Gregory Kohs
- Location: United States
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
My brother has always gotten a chuckle out of the fact that, at times, the Wikimedia Foundation has seemed more tolerant of child porn distributors than of me.Tarc wrote:So a Wall of Shame that lumps a noted Wikipedia critic alongside degenerate slime like Beta and Demiurge. Surely that was unintentional.
"...making nonsensical connections and culminating in feigned surprise, since 2006..."
- Randy from Boise
- Been Around Forever
- Posts: 12234
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:32 am
- Wikipedia User: Carrite
- Wikipedia Review Member: Timbo
- Actual Name: Tim Davenport
- Nom de plume: T. Chandler
- Location: Boise, Idaho
Re: Two more global bans
I wish there was a way we could ban individuals from WMF.
It does make more sense than a system-wide ban of Kohs.
RfB
It does make more sense than a system-wide ban of Kohs.
RfB
- Moral Hazard
- Super Genius
- Posts: 3401
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 4:46 pm
- Wikipedia User: Kiefer.Wolfowitz
- Nom de plume: Kiefer Wolfowitz
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
Banning Kohs helps the WMF defend itself it anybody sues it for defamation, alleging that global bans are tantamount to accusations of child pornography/molestation.
Kiefer.Wolfowitz (T-C-L)
“Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be—or to be indistinguishable from—self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time.”
Neal Stephenson (T-H-L) Cryptonomicon
“Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be—or to be indistinguishable from—self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time.”
Neal Stephenson (T-H-L) Cryptonomicon
- Rogol Domedonfors
- Habitué
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2015 9:09 pm
- Wikipedia User: Rogol Domedonfors
Re: Two more global bans
At the risk of repeating myself, I'll just remind those subject to a WMF ban of any kind that, if the ban has been communicated to any chapters or affilated organisations in the EU, then the subjects are entitled to obtain the records relating to them personally, whether or not they are themselves located in or citizens of those countries. A Data Subject Access request might prove fruitful.
- Poetlister
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
Zoloft wrote:Greg was probably banned because, like the sun coming up every day - whether you want it to or not - he is an eternal verity.
That sounds like a good description of Wikipedia.The sun also rises, and the sun goes down,
And hastens to the place where it arose.
The wind goes toward the south,
And turns around to the north;
The wind whirls about continually,
And comes again on its circuit.
All the rivers run into the sea, yet the sea is not full;
To the place whence the rivers come,
Thence they return again.
All things are full of labour;
Man cannot express it.
The eye is not satisfied with seeing,
Nor the ear filled with hearing.
That which has been is what will be,
That which is done is what will be done,
And there is nothing new under the sun.
Is there anything of which it may be said, "See, this is new"?
It has already been in ancient times before us.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
- greyed.out.fields
- Gregarious
- Posts: 874
- Joined: Thu May 31, 2012 10:59 am
- Wikipedia User: I AM your guilty pleasure
- Actual Name: Written addiction
- Location: Back alley hang-up
Re: Two more global bans
I think 1:17-18 is better.Poetlister wrote:Zoloft wrote:Greg was probably banned because, like the sun coming up every day - whether you want it to or not - he is an eternal verity.That sounds like a good description of Wikipedia.The sun also rises (T-H-L), and the sun goes down,
And hastens to the place where it arose.
The wind goes toward the south,
And turns around to the north;
The wind whirls about continually,
And comes again on its circuit.
All the rivers run (T-H-L) into the sea, yet the sea is not full;
To the place whence the rivers come,
Thence they return again.
All things are full of labour;
Man cannot express it.
The eye is not satisfied with seeing,
Nor the ear filled with hearing.
That which has been is what will be,
That which is done is what will be done,
And there is nothing new under the sun.
Is there anything of which it may be said, "See, this is new"?
It has already been in ancient times before us.
List of books with titles taken from Ecclesiates (T-H-L) doesn't exist, but definitely could.Ha Qoheleth wrote: And I gave my heart to know wisdom, and to know madness and folly: I perceived that this also is vexation of spirit.
For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow.
• A time to kill, (T-H-L) and a time to heal; a time to break down, and a time to build up; (3:3)
• Who knoweth the spirit of man that goeth upward, and the spirit of the beast that goeth downward to the earth (T-H-L)? (3:21)
• The heart of the wise is in the house of mourning; but the heart of fools is in the house of mirth (T-H-L). (7:4)
And so on. At least 16, by my count.
"Snowflakes around the world are laughing at your low melting temperature."
- Midsize Jake
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9949
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:10 pm
- Wikipedia Review Member: Somey
Re: Two more global bans
That's a very good point, though I doubt it's what they were thinking when they added him to their little shit-list. And to some extent it works the other way around too, in that people alleged to have committed serious moral offenses in/on WMF venues can more easily claim to simply be "critics," targeted for having dared to say mean things about the WMF.Moral Hazard wrote:Banning Kohs helps the WMF defend itself it anybody sues it for defamation, alleging that global bans are tantamount to accusations of child pornography/molestation.
Obviously they won't (and shouldn't) reveal what the more recent listees are alleged to have done, but these latest two additions do seem to suggest that the inclusion bar has been lowered. This "Graaf Statler" dude's main offense seems to have been that he publicly claimed that the WMF chapter in the Netherlands was a total boondoggle, along with all of its paid staff. I'm sure he was extremely irritating and insulting in the process, and I'm willing to accept that there was probably more going on behind the scenes, but based on what we can actually see you'd think a regular ol' site-ban would be sufficient in a case like that, even for them.
Re: Two more global bans
A point I have tried to make to various people when they insist on doing business through *mailing lists*.Rogol Domedonfors wrote:At the risk of repeating myself, I'll just remind those subject to a WMF ban of any kind that, if the ban has been communicated to any chapters or affilated organisations in the EU, then the subjects are entitled to obtain the records relating to them personally, whether or not they are themselves located in or citizens of those countries. A Data Subject Access request might prove fruitful.
- thekohser
- Majordomo
- Posts: 13410
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 5:07 pm
- Wikipedia User: Thekohser
- Wikipedia Review Member: thekohser
- Actual Name: Gregory Kohs
- Location: United States
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
My favorite part of my ban notice was the typo in the message (pointing me to the wrong domain in an e-mail address, should I want to learn more about my ban). James Alexander was sweet enough to say "thank you" when I pointed out the typo to him.
They're so professional there in expensive San Francisco!
They're so professional there in expensive San Francisco!
"...making nonsensical connections and culminating in feigned surprise, since 2006..."
- Malik Shabazz
- Critic
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:55 am
- Wikipedia User: Malik Shabazz
- Location: God bless Chocolate City and its vanilla suburbs
Re: Two more global bans
Only at times?thekohser wrote:My brother has always gotten a chuckle out of the fact that, at times, the Wikimedia Foundation has seemed more tolerant of child porn distributors than of me.Tarc wrote:So a Wall of Shame that lumps a noted Wikipedia critic alongside degenerate slime like Beta and Demiurge. Surely that was unintentional.
- Earthy Astringent
- Banned
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2015 7:16 am
Re: Two more global bans
We're not surprised.thekohser wrote:My favorite part of my ban notice was the typo in the message
- Kingsindian
- Habitué
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 10:07 am
- Wikipedia User: Kingsindian
Re: Two more global bans
Earthy Astringent wrote:We're not surprised.thekohser wrote:My favorite part of my ban notice was the typo in the message
- Rogol Domedonfors
- Habitué
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2015 9:09 pm
- Wikipedia User: Rogol Domedonfors
Re: Two more global bans
The fact that the WMF refuse to discuss the reason for a ban, even with the subject, could be played agains them. If it were to become current that some banned user had in fact been working to expose financial malfeasance by the WMF, or one of its subsidiaries, and that they had been banned to keep them from talking to disaffected staff, or victims, then the WMF would, presumably, be unable to refute that. Or if they do make a public pronouncement on the reason for a ban, then the ban subjects can ask again for details of the reasons on the grounds that WMF are now discussing them.
- Rogol Domedonfors
- Habitué
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2015 9:09 pm
- Wikipedia User: Rogol Domedonfors
Re: Two more global bans
Followup: Alternatively, you could put it about that a banned user had been subverting Wikipedia in the interests of a foreign power. It's all good.
- thekohser
- Majordomo
- Posts: 13410
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 5:07 pm
- Wikipedia User: Thekohser
- Wikipedia Review Member: thekohser
- Actual Name: Gregory Kohs
- Location: United States
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
I believe that Mr. Statler's analysis of his own situation is found here:Midsize Jake wrote:This "Graaf Statler" dude's main offense seems to have been that he publicly claimed that the WMF chapter in the Netherlands was a total boondoggle, along with all of its paid staff. I'm sure he was extremely irritating and insulting in the process, and I'm willing to accept that there was probably more going on behind the scenes, but based on what we can actually see you'd think a regular ol' site-ban would be sufficient in a case like that, even for them.
https://pediahoedblog.wordpress.com/201 ... wikipedia/
Either that, or someone writing about him with his close assistance. Not sure... it's in Dutch.
"...making nonsensical connections and culminating in feigned surprise, since 2006..."
- Poetlister
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
He makes the probably very valid point that the proceedings against him were as sensible as Lewis Carroll's description of the trial of the Knave of Hearts. However, the latter ended with Alice up-ending the jury box. (Yes, I know, that's by A. L. Bowley from the Centennial Edition, not the original illustrstion.)
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
- Rogol Domedonfors
- Habitué
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2015 9:09 pm
- Wikipedia User: Rogol Domedonfors
Re: Two more global bans
In another thread it was suggested that it might now be a criminal offence for banned users to attempt to access the site. Is that decision still in force?
Re: Two more global bans
Russavia was banned more than two years ago. He's made hundreds of thousands of edits since then. Leucosticte, who was banned the same day as Russavia, also continues to edit. The foundation doesn't do anything other than lock their new accounts when they're noticed.Rogol Domedonfors wrote:In another thread it was suggested that it might now be a criminal offence for banned users to attempt to access the site. Is that decision still in force?
For more background on Leucosticte, see last month's Washington post story, He threatened to kill the president. Now he is seeking public office. He's also been discussed extensively here.
- Kelly Martin
- Habitué
- Posts: 3377
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:30 am
- Location: EN61bw
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
Not without sending a formal cease-and-desist by some means of communication that provides proof beyond reasonable doubt that the individual in question actually received it. An email notification of a "ban" is almost certainly not enough.Rogol Domedonfors wrote:In another thread it was suggested that it might now be a criminal offence for banned users to attempt to access the site. Is that decision still in force?
However, if there is anyone that the WMF would seek criminal charges against for editing through a ban, it's Greg Kohs. He's clearly far more dangerous than all of the child molesters, domestic stalkers, or other sexual predators than they routinely let edit. Because he says things that hurt Jimmy's feelings, and we must not allow that.
- Randy from Boise
- Been Around Forever
- Posts: 12234
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:32 am
- Wikipedia User: Carrite
- Wikipedia Review Member: Timbo
- Actual Name: Tim Davenport
- Nom de plume: T. Chandler
- Location: Boise, Idaho
Re: Two more global bans
Let's call him Sarsaparilla , that's a much better handle.tarantino wrote:For more background on Leucosticte, see last month's Washington post story, He threatened to kill the president. Now he is seeking public office. He's also been discussed extensively here.
He is the most.............ummm.....................intense Libertarian on the planet.
I won't say he's not a kook, to be sure, but he is also unquestionably a political dissident out to make a point.
I support him, speaking as a civil libertarian, if not his personal politics or his precise actions.
He's a canary in the coal mine.
RfB
- Poetlister
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
Not to mention his intention to shoot Jimmy.Kelly Martin wrote:However, if there is anyone that the WMF would seek criminal charges against for editing through a ban, it's Greg Kohs. He's clearly far more dangerous than all of the child molesters, domestic stalkers, or other sexual predators than they routinely let edit. Because he says things that hurt Jimmy's feelings, and we must not allow that.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
Re: Two more global bans
Not a cuckoo in the coal mine?Randy from Boise wrote: He's a canary in the coal mine.
- Graaf Statler
- Proud Wikipedian (muted)
- Posts: 1477
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:43 pm
- Wikipedia User: Graaf Statler
- Actual Name: Honored by the SanFranBan
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
I am Graaf Statler. First, sorry for my poor English. In the first place, I was never I was never rude. In the second place I left Wikipedia-NL early 2016, and did after my Global Lock, what was one big lie a you can see till begin April 2017 some minor edits. Out of the bleu I got a email from mister James Alexander I was Global blockt, without any reason. And aldo I sended several polite mails, I didn't get any answer why. The reason is total unclear to me. Alexander only told me that I had broken rules of the Foundation and that's it.
But it is a great honor the be one of the few global users. Last year I only did three ore for minor edids a day on a complete unimportant project, Wikiquote_NL with three users, now zero. , never did one edit what was not integer, and who had left the Wikipedia projects for one month. And I am not a sockpopplayer. I am a older integer gentleman.
But it is a great honor the be one of the few global users. Last year I only did three ore for minor edids a day on a complete unimportant project, Wikiquote_NL with three users, now zero. , never did one edit what was not integer, and who had left the Wikipedia projects for one month. And I am not a sockpopplayer. I am a older integer gentleman.
Not any connection to the English Wikipedia!
- Graaf Statler
- Proud Wikipedian (muted)
- Posts: 1477
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:43 pm
- Wikipedia User: Graaf Statler
- Actual Name: Honored by the SanFranBan
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
(My written English is really s.h.i.t. Hope you understand what I writhe) By the way, I was never a Review Member, I was a minor editer who sometimes in a calm way wikimedia and wikipedia criticized, before I was Global lockt. And sometimes in a funny way. And now I am a kind of wiki-Mafia bosses. A great honor, much better han the Hall of Fame, but very strange.
Not any connection to the English Wikipedia!
- Bezdomni
- Habitué
- Posts: 2961
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 9:07 pm
- Wikipedia User: RosasHills
- Location: Monster Vainglory ON (.. party HQ ..)
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
Hi Graaf. I am fairly sure that if you wrote a more complete message to Wikipediocracy (perhaps in one of the secret sub-forums) in Dutch, someone could be found to translate it. Perhaps Drmies is a member here, for example.
Unfortunately, writing in English without links may make people think the account is a joe job (not sure how to translate this into Dutch: basically usurping someone's identity). Claiming you are an integer is all well and good, but writing up an essay would help everyone better understand the array of issues involved in your string being popped off the Wikipedia stack.
Unfortunately, writing in English without links may make people think the account is a joe job (not sure how to translate this into Dutch: basically usurping someone's identity). Claiming you are an integer is all well and good, but writing up an essay would help everyone better understand the array of issues involved in your string being popped off the Wikipedia stack.
los auberginos
- thekohser
- Majordomo
- Posts: 13410
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 5:07 pm
- Wikipedia User: Thekohser
- Wikipedia Review Member: thekohser
- Actual Name: Gregory Kohs
- Location: United States
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
I'm about 90% sure that it's going to be "the same old story". An editor (probably justifiably) feels that administrators are suppressing his right to modify Wikipedia content in a way that follows policy, but does not adhere to the "party line" of the administrators. Things escalate quickly, and soon the editor is unmasking the ulterior motives of the administrator corps, which "outs" some administrators, and now they feel that their "health and safety" are threatened, and thus the ban and global shunning.Bezdomni wrote:...writing up an essay would help everyone better understand ...
So, probably not a major need to write an essay, unless that would float Graaf's boat.
"...making nonsensical connections and culminating in feigned surprise, since 2006..."
- Graaf Statler
- Proud Wikipedian (muted)
- Posts: 1477
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:43 pm
- Wikipedia User: Graaf Statler
- Actual Name: Honored by the SanFranBan
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
I understand. But I don't have the intention to become a regular guest here, this topic is about me. If you wants to know what happend, try to find someone who can explane ore cn translate what is written in the link thecosher gave to you. And you will find out that not only Wikimedia-NL is a complete boondoggle (Nice word), but wikipedia-nl too.
And if you don't believe me, read this (or try to find someone who know Dutch) blog about the the of catastrofe of the GLAM project of the famous Rijksmuzeum. (Dutch) Like every project of Wikimedia-Nl ends up in a disaster.
And off course the foundation knows about this. But...Wikipedia got the Erasmusprijs, is't it? In the Netherlands.
https://edoornbusch.wordpress.com/
And if you don't believe me, read this (or try to find someone who know Dutch) blog about the the of catastrofe of the GLAM project of the famous Rijksmuzeum. (Dutch) Like every project of Wikimedia-Nl ends up in a disaster.
And off course the foundation knows about this. But...Wikipedia got the Erasmusprijs, is't it? In the Netherlands.
https://edoornbusch.wordpress.com/
Not any connection to the English Wikipedia!
- Bezdomni
- Habitué
- Posts: 2961
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 9:07 pm
- Wikipedia User: RosasHills
- Location: Monster Vainglory ON (.. party HQ ..)
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
Sometimes being a crappy reader is a good thing, I'd missed the link above, but am glad to see the one you just added.
los auberginos
- The Adversary
- Habitué
- Posts: 2466
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:01 am
- Location: Troll country
Re: Two more global bans
<edit> My mistake, Graaf Statler is not edoornbusch...Graaf Statler wrote:I understand. But I don't have the intention to become a regular guest here, this topic is about me. If you wants to know what happend, try to find someone who can explane ore cn translate what is written in the link thecosher gave to you. And you will find out that not only Wikimedia-NL is a complete boondoggle (Nice word), but wikipedia-nl too.
And if you don't believe me, read this (or try to find someone who know Dutch) blog about the the of catastrofe of the GLAM project of the famous Rijksmuzeum. (Dutch) Like every project of Wikimedia-Nl ends up in a disaster.
And off course the foundation knows about this. But...Wikipedia got the Erasmusprijs, is't it? In the Netherlands.
https://edoornbusch.wordpress.com/
Last edited by The Adversary on Wed May 03, 2017 10:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Graaf Statler
- Proud Wikipedian (muted)
- Posts: 1477
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:43 pm
- Wikipedia User: Graaf Statler
- Actual Name: Honored by the SanFranBan
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
Sorry for the confusion, that is not my blog, it was only to give a expression I was not the one who had serious criticism of Wikipedia and Wikimedia-NL. I only wrote some not controversial articles long forgotten professors, Churches, toy trains, en Greek politics.
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gebruiker ... trolelijst
I was not extremely irritating and insulting, because block wonder CaAl immediately block you, especially when you say something wrong about Wikimedia.
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciaal:Bijdragen/CaAl
So, the question was, why is Graaf Statler global blockt. To tell you the truth I have no idea. I Ieft wikipedia for a year, and I left Wikiquote for a mounth. So, it feels like you get an email that you won the Nobel Prize after your have resigned. It's all a big mystery to me.
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gebruiker ... trolelijst
I was not extremely irritating and insulting, because block wonder CaAl immediately block you, especially when you say something wrong about Wikimedia.
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciaal:Bijdragen/CaAl
So, the question was, why is Graaf Statler global blockt. To tell you the truth I have no idea. I Ieft wikipedia for a year, and I left Wikiquote for a mounth. So, it feels like you get an email that you won the Nobel Prize after your have resigned. It's all a big mystery to me.
Not any connection to the English Wikipedia!
- Bezdomni
- Habitué
- Posts: 2961
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 9:07 pm
- Wikipedia User: RosasHills
- Location: Monster Vainglory ON (.. party HQ ..)
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
My guess is that it's less because you reverted Chewing Tinfoil here than because of the sockpuppets? "This & that" needs exploration, but even translated I'm still struggling to see the big picture. (The edits I looked through quickly on V's page looked reasonable.)
los auberginos
- Graaf Statler
- Proud Wikipedian (muted)
- Posts: 1477
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:43 pm
- Wikipedia User: Graaf Statler
- Actual Name: Honored by the SanFranBan
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
I don't think so. Nobody ever criticized my work. Until this block request came out of the blue. My work would be copyvio.
https://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... _Statler_2
My work was not copyvio, but Natuur12 blocked me OT, and asked for a Global lock, based on his OT block.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward ... af_Statler
https://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... _Statler_2
My work was not copyvio, but Natuur12 blocked me OT, and asked for a Global lock, based on his OT block.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward ... af_Statler
Not any connection to the English Wikipedia!
- Earthy Astringent
- Banned
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2015 7:16 am
Re: Two more global bans
Graaf Statler wrote:I am a older integer gentleman.
Not making fun of your English, but I can only hope you meant to say you are an older, rationale gentleman.
- Graaf Statler
- Proud Wikipedian (muted)
- Posts: 1477
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:43 pm
- Wikipedia User: Graaf Statler
- Actual Name: Honored by the SanFranBan
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
......And one of I wrote article I wrote was about my father, a professors English language and Old English literature...........
Not any connection to the English Wikipedia!
- Graaf Statler
- Proud Wikipedian (muted)
- Posts: 1477
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:43 pm
- Wikipedia User: Graaf Statler
- Actual Name: Honored by the SanFranBan
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
I have a form of dyslexia. So, my school career was not a success and I'm a craftsman. I learned English Greek and German from practice but actually can't write these Languages.Only for this reason cross-wiki abuse is complete nonsens!
Not any connection to the English Wikipedia!
- Graaf Statler
- Proud Wikipedian (muted)
- Posts: 1477
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:43 pm
- Wikipedia User: Graaf Statler
- Actual Name: Honored by the SanFranBan
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
Why not. MoiraMoira already thrown my identity around and I'm proud of him.
This was my father: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Vleeskruijer
This was my father: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Vleeskruijer
Not any connection to the English Wikipedia!
- Bezdomni
- Habitué
- Posts: 2961
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 9:07 pm
- Wikipedia User: RosasHills
- Location: Monster Vainglory ON (.. party HQ ..)
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
Seriously. intègre / integriste / integer (whole number, nombre entier) / integral / integration.... it's good to think outside your comfort lexicon from time to time.Earthy Astringent wrote:Graaf Statler wrote:I am a older integer gentleman.
Not making fun of your English, but I can only hope you meant to say you are an older, rationale gentleman.
But I'm guessing you make mistakes on purpose to see if GK will correct you?
I think I was reading in Jemelniak that Dutch Wikipedia was the most heavily edited WP per capita in the projects. Is this true?
ps fascinating work has been done on OE/ME syntax in recent years (generative perspective)
los auberginos
- Graaf Statler
- Proud Wikipedian (muted)
- Posts: 1477
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:43 pm
- Wikipedia User: Graaf Statler
- Actual Name: Honored by the SanFranBan
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
I am not a tipical Wikipedian. In fackt, I don't know much about the technical site. The only thing I did was writing sometimes a article, and many times I told them that the way they were writing a encyclopedia was a dead end. That's all.
Wikipedia-NL is very good in lagre numbers, and tecnical matters. But almost nobody is able to write a article. Fot instace, most Wikimedia members and Wikipedias in recedence never wrote one single article or are even not active on Wikipedia. Or as a kind of policimen, to give you a block of you say something they don't like.
Thats the reason most activety's of Wikimedia fail, they have no idea!
Almost every article is written by a bot. Many times it's copyvio, but they don't care about copvio. Wikipedia-NL is dominated by a small group of users, united in Wikimedia-NL, and if you are not one of them, well, look at my blogpost what happens.
But international they have great fame, because of there technical work I suppose.
But there one Wiki is a enorme mess. A real boondoggle.
I am sure the foundation knows about this. But I think tey are afraid to admit this, because it will hurt there imago. And that explances the supid accentions against me, because it is childish. This the way children acts.
But most of them are autistic, so I think that the reason for this soap.
And I don't care about there blocks and locks and other nonsens, because I am am living in the world of handcraftman and not in the world of would be interlectuals!
So, that was a lot of English, hope you understand it!
Wikipedia-NL is very good in lagre numbers, and tecnical matters. But almost nobody is able to write a article. Fot instace, most Wikimedia members and Wikipedias in recedence never wrote one single article or are even not active on Wikipedia. Or as a kind of policimen, to give you a block of you say something they don't like.
Thats the reason most activety's of Wikimedia fail, they have no idea!
Almost every article is written by a bot. Many times it's copyvio, but they don't care about copvio. Wikipedia-NL is dominated by a small group of users, united in Wikimedia-NL, and if you are not one of them, well, look at my blogpost what happens.
But international they have great fame, because of there technical work I suppose.
But there one Wiki is a enorme mess. A real boondoggle.
I am sure the foundation knows about this. But I think tey are afraid to admit this, because it will hurt there imago. And that explances the supid accentions against me, because it is childish. This the way children acts.
But most of them are autistic, so I think that the reason for this soap.
And I don't care about there blocks and locks and other nonsens, because I am am living in the world of handcraftman and not in the world of would be interlectuals!
So, that was a lot of English, hope you understand it!
Not any connection to the English Wikipedia!
- Poetlister
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
I'm not making fun of your English, but it's bad form to make a mistake when correcting someone else. You mean "rational", not "rationale", and he may have meant that he has integrity.Earthy Astringent wrote:Not making fun of your English, but I can only hope you meant to say you are an older, rationale gentleman.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
- Graaf Statler
- Proud Wikipedian (muted)
- Posts: 1477
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:43 pm
- Wikipedia User: Graaf Statler
- Actual Name: Honored by the SanFranBan
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
Make as much fun of my English as you like, I don't care. The people here seems to me much more normale and friendly than the bunch of idiots I met on Wikipedia till now. Like I told you, I learnt English, German and Greek in practice, and I understand what people are saying, and I hope they understand me. That's all.
And Wikipedia is not a way of living for me, it was only that I fount this topic in google, and that I wanted to tell my site of the story, and that's is all.
For me both global blocks of my college Wiki-Nobel Price winner, theokosher and me, will always remain a mystery, and I think I have to live with that fact.
It is really a experience! Out of the bleu you became a wiki celebrity, without any explanation! Questions? What questions. We don't answer questions!
By the way, when is the opening of the new branch of Wikimedia in Pyongyang?
And Wikipedia is not a way of living for me, it was only that I fount this topic in google, and that I wanted to tell my site of the story, and that's is all.
For me both global blocks of my college Wiki-Nobel Price winner, theokosher and me, will always remain a mystery, and I think I have to live with that fact.
It is really a experience! Out of the bleu you became a wiki celebrity, without any explanation! Questions? What questions. We don't answer questions!
By the way, when is the opening of the new branch of Wikimedia in Pyongyang?
Not any connection to the English Wikipedia!
- Earthy Astringent
- Banned
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2015 7:16 am
Re: Two more global bans
Poetlister wrote:I'm not making fun of your English, but it's bad form to make a mistake when correcting someone else. You mean "rational", not "rationale", and he may have meant that he has integrity.Earthy Astringent wrote:Not making fun of your English, but I can only hope you meant to say you are an older, rationale gentleman.
It's bad form to correct a softball left for Greg.
- thekohser
- Majordomo
- Posts: 13410
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 5:07 pm
- Wikipedia User: Thekohser
- Wikipedia Review Member: thekohser
- Actual Name: Gregory Kohs
- Location: United States
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
I mean, seriously, right? I feel so robbed now. Thanks a whole lot, Poetlister.Earthy Astringent wrote:Poetlister wrote:I'm not making fun of your English, but it's bad form to make a mistake when correcting someone else. You mean "rational", not "rationale", and he may have meant that he has integrity.Earthy Astringent wrote:Not making fun of your English, but I can only hope you meant to say you are an older, rationale gentleman.
It's bad form to correct a softball left for Greg.
"...making nonsensical connections and culminating in feigned surprise, since 2006..."
- thekohser
- Majordomo
- Posts: 13410
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 5:07 pm
- Wikipedia User: Thekohser
- Wikipedia Review Member: thekohser
- Actual Name: Gregory Kohs
- Location: United States
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
Received this message from Wikimedia.org last night:
Any reasonable person would conclude that my SanFranBan has been lifted, and I am welcome back on Wikimedia projects.
Either that, or I have a valid claim of either harassment/taunting or entrapment. They want me to violate their previous instructions, so that they can take me to court, right?
Any reasonable person would conclude that my SanFranBan has been lifted, and I am welcome back on Wikimedia projects.
Either that, or I have a valid claim of either harassment/taunting or entrapment. They want me to violate their previous instructions, so that they can take me to court, right?
"...making nonsensical connections and culminating in feigned surprise, since 2006..."
- Graaf Statler
- Proud Wikipedian (muted)
- Posts: 1477
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:43 pm
- Wikipedia User: Graaf Statler
- Actual Name: Honored by the SanFranBan
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
Ingotbstrange emails they ware waiting fot my hext sokpop. A kind of invitation to post on wikiquote again. Don't worry, they are a bit simple. And they look like adulds, but act like children 12 years old.
Not any connection to the English Wikipedia!
- Graaf Statler
- Proud Wikipedian (muted)
- Posts: 1477
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:43 pm
- Wikipedia User: Graaf Statler
- Actual Name: Honored by the SanFranBan
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Two more global bans
Mhhhh a I pad is not a succes... I got strange emals they are waiting for my next sockpuppet... sorry... But I think this is the new strategy of Mr. Alexander.
Not any connection to the English Wikipedia!