A Wikipedia about objects?

User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
kołdry
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way

A Wikipedia about objects?

Unread post by Poetlister » Thu Jun 30, 2016 8:54 pm

A stunning suggestion on Wikidata:
Hi, how about a wikipedia about objects?

Instead of generic articles of , for example, "Ballpoint pen" or "Bic cristal" it would be "Ballpoint pen Bic cristal 2014"

Doing these for millions of objects would allow people to have an open, free, universal and central place to refer specific objects.
Why isn't there a Wikipedia article on "Ballpoint pen Bic cristal 2014" already?
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

Textnyymi
Gregarious
Posts: 650
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 1:29 pm
Wikipedia Review Member: Text
Actual Name: Anonyymi

Re: A Wikipedia about objects?

Unread post by Textnyymi » Thu Jun 30, 2016 9:34 pm

And after the Internet of Things... the Wiki of Things!

Auggie
Regular
Posts: 490
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 2:30 am

Re: A Wikipedia about objects?

Unread post by Auggie » Thu Jun 30, 2016 10:03 pm

I would favor Wikipedia becoming way more inclusionist than it is. Wikipedia biases towards artwork, literature, and entertainment and excludes real world useful objects that affect us every day.

For example, wouldn't it be great to have a page about the 2016 Honda Accord? No, Wikipedia jams everything into a single Honda Accord (T-H-L) article. Despite having millions of readers interested in Accords and more than enough material to write an article, they exclude it.

Instead we get articles about imaginary shit no one cares about. e.g. ZZ_Gundam (T-H-L)

User avatar
Johnny Au
Habitué
Posts: 2620
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 5:05 pm
Wikipedia User: Johnny Au
Actual Name: Johnny Au
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Re: A Wikipedia about objects?

Unread post by Johnny Au » Thu Jun 30, 2016 11:42 pm

Not just automobiles, but trains and trams as well. There are numerous articles on Flexity (T-H-L), which is a line of light rail vehicles produced by Bombardier. Even customized versions such as Flexity Berlin (T-H-L) and Flexity Outlook (Toronto streetcar) (T-H-L) have separate articles.

User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way

Re: A Wikipedia about objects?

Unread post by Poetlister » Fri Jul 01, 2016 11:41 am

Don't forget that there's an article about every railway station in London, and I expect every one in Britain. No doubt there will eventually be one about every bus stop.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

User avatar
thekohser
Majordomo
Posts: 13410
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 5:07 pm
Wikipedia User: Thekohser
Wikipedia Review Member: thekohser
Actual Name: Gregory Kohs
Location: United States

Re: A Wikipedia about objects?

Unread post by thekohser » Fri Jul 01, 2016 2:01 pm

Poetlister wrote:Why isn't there a Wikipedia article on "Ballpoint pen Bic cristal 2014" already?
More importantly, why not "Ballpoint pen Bic cristal 2014 blue" and "Ballpoint pen Bic cristal 2014 black" and "Ballpoint pen Bic cristal 2014 red"?

This is a great idea and we should strongly encourage it.

</hasten the day>
"...making nonsensical connections and culminating in feigned surprise, since 2006..."

GlwnDwr
Critic
Posts: 140
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2016 4:39 pm

Re: A Wikipedia about objects?

Unread post by GlwnDwr » Fri Jul 01, 2016 3:18 pm

Bernie Sanders' Dank Meme Stash (T-H-L) and articles about obscure pens are the embodiment of Wikipedia's current state. :dalek:

User avatar
Rogol Domedonfors
Habitué
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2015 9:09 pm
Wikipedia User: Rogol Domedonfors

Re: A Wikipedia about objects?

Unread post by Rogol Domedonfors » Fri May 05, 2017 5:25 pm

Poetlister wrote:Don't forget that there's an article about every railway station in London, and I expect every one in Britain. No doubt there will eventually be one about every bus stop.
At least a thousand from the former Soviet union are notable, it seems. I really enjoyed the book.