My Wikipedia Hell
Posted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 6:03 am
I will begin with describing myself.
I am an ex conspiracy theorist. I first got into conspiracy around 2009. However by 2012 i was verging on conspiracy Skepticism and by 2016 i am relatively active in trying to bring to light some of the dangers of conspiracy. I have come to the realisation that certain guru's are not just harmless crackpots like many regard them. But are actually quite dangerous madmen. Especially when it come to Anti-vaccination, Aids denialism, alternative cures ect. They are dangerous, and they kill people and they make money out of selling alternative cures that cost more than conventional cures, and on top of that, they dont work.
Anyway, i am not here to bash you with my enlightenment and my over arrogance, i am here to tell you about my wikipedia hell.
Wikipedia has for years been a great tool for me to get information to help me tackle conspiracy believers in debate. I am unbeaten over at debate.org. Not because i am intelligent, but because i get all my information from wikipedia. I have you editors to thank for my 100% unbeaten record in debates for points.
Now i perhaps stupidly had an inclination to make an article regarding HIV denialism, and as an admirer of Wikipedia i thought what better place to try get the information out there.
So for the first time ever i decided to create a wikipedia account.
It was perhaps a stupid mistake, especially being my first post. It was always going to be hard to remain neutral given that i am a hardcore opponent of aids denialism, and no matter how hard i try to be neutral, it is always going to shine through that i am an opponent of aids denialism.
Anyway, i first tried the username i am most commonly known as on other forums, and it was already taken.
So i tried "Illuminati". Already taken. Tried "Itanimulli", already taken. I then tried my name backwards, and that was already taken.
I tried my name backwards adding a 1. Already taken.
Added a 2. Already taken.
Finally, i added a 3, and hallelujah, i had just created my first account.
I then logged out of the account to make sure i could log back in again, and when i did i got a message saying password not recognised. (Maybe i made a typo). But instead of trying again, i just created another account and called it "Nevets4".
So, i went and i began trying to work out how you create an article, and i got to work.
However i noticed at the top of the page was my username, "Nevets4" and i did not want my username at the top of my article.
For example, when i am using wikipedia, and i am on a page called "Aids denialism" ususally at the top of the page is "Aids denialism".
So, i began trying to work out how to replace my username with the name i want to head my article with, and i could find noway of doing this. (Please remember this is my first 5-10mins of ever being having an account with Wikipedia).
So, not realising then that just because it is my username that as at the top of my article while creating it, does not mean that is what the article will be called when created, i logged back out, and created a username that was identical to what i wanted to call my article.
So i spent several hours on my article. Not doing a great job, as i was just eager to get my first ever article onto wikipedia, or at least find out how the place works. I admit the article was not in the least bit worthy of inclusion, and not surprisingly it got rejected.
What i was surprised about, was one of the reasons it got rejected.
It got rejected because they had noticed that my username was the same as my article (Not a hard thing to notice) and this suggested to them that i was using the account for promotional purposes or was in some way affiliated with the group i was writing about.
I was surprised at this, because i am a hard-core opponent of Aids denialism and the group i was discussing in the article are Aids denialists and my article was not favourable to them in the slightest, so i was suprised how anyone reading the article could possibally get the impression i am affiliated with the group.
Anyway, it was not long before i received a message telling me i was blocked from editing. The reasons given for my block where the same as above. They suspect that i am affiliated with the Aids denialist group. (Although i got the impression that whoever looked at the article had not taken much time to read it, if they got the impression i was speaking favouraby about this Aids denialist group).
So i then went through the painstaking process of trying to get unblocked.
The person that blocked me put on my template some advice on how i can appeal.
However whenever i clicked on the link, it would just bring to a page with stacks of advice and information, and whenever i came to something a link that actually worked, it would not let me make my appeal as i would just get a message saying "You are blocked from editing".
WOW, i thought. they give me a link to make an appeal but i cant actually make the appeal because making the appeal would mean writing, and i am blocked from writing.
So, pulling my hair out i kept trying, and trying, and trying. (By this time i have forgot all about Nevets3 and Nevets4...And i think i just assumed for some reason those accounts would have got merged in with my new-one anyway)
Finally, probably by fluke, i doubt i could even find it again, i found something and was able to make contact with someoene at last, Hallelujah.
So i requested i become unblocked and requested a new username.
Almost instantly, i received an email from wikipedia telling me "We cant authorise this account just now because you are blocked" and they sent me a link, and it was the very same link that the admin who had blocked me, sent me. Aghhhhhhhhhhhhhhr.
Getting a little exasperated now, i just emailed back, saying "Look ect ect ect...Cant you just give me a link to an appeals department or simply just close my old account and give me a new one without all this sifting through pages and pages and pages and pages of information with little final resolution.
I then went to the new username i had requested "Nevets30" and i tried to log in with it, and i was quite surprised when it gave me access.
I then went to my page, just to be utterly dejected when i received a message on my page telling me "This account is blocked".
I assumed that it was a URL block.
I then went to Sandbox a little time later, and i suddenly found out i was able to edit.
I went back to my user page and the message telling me i was blocked had dissapeared. So what do you think i assumed? i assumed that my "Email reply" had been accepted and that they had afterall just decided to scrap my old account and reward me with my requested ne username.
So, i got about editing.
I did not even bother going back to my old article, i had dropped it from my agenda as i knew i could not write it in a neutral way.
So i just got about editing.
I made 9 or 10 edits. All of which remained on wikipedia and never got removed, so i can only assume that they were accepted as accurate with a verifiable source.
I received no complaints about my editing.
Then, i did an edit on the CIA page. It was not 100% favourable to the CIA, and it was regarding one of their controversies, and straight away within seconds this was removed, and i had the person that removed it on my page, not telling me that my information was wrong, but telling me that he had removed my edit because i was not allowed to edit as i have a blocked sock puppet account.
Eh? i thought. I then received several other messages, and could see he was making several complaints to admins, calling me a "gamer" "sock puppet" ect.
I went to sleep, not worried, and in the morning when i woke up, i logged in and was so dissapointed to see that one of the admins had taken his claim seriously and decided i was infact a sock puppet with a blocked username.
So i went about trying to explain myself, and finally managed to find a way of appealing my block (which i thought had already been resolved) and i was given a ticket number and i stated my case...forgetting about Nevets3 & 4)
After several hours i received a reply telling me i was unblocked to request a change of username. (dont know why she could not just have closed the account and let me have Nevets20...but hey ho)
So i went about trying to find out how you request a new username. Sifting through endless pages of informations.
Then after about 1 hour, a message suddenly popped up telling me i am blocked again because she had just found out about Nevets 3 & 4 and told me i am "A SOCK MASTER".
Below is a brief conversation i found about me between admins
"The editor has 3 other accounts which I blocked recently as socks. If you look at this version of the talk page for Nevets20[5] you'll see ". I then put in a change name "request" [ACC #164445]". When I blocked I knew nothing about this, and he/she still hasn't mentioned the other 2 accounts User:Nevets3 and User:Nevets4. name withheld talk 16:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
@Name withheld: Oh, good grief. All I could see was a username hardblock. I didn't know anything about this either. Do you want to reblock or should I? Katietalk 16:37, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Never mind - I reblocked as the sock master since you tagged the others that way. name withheld 17:09, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, but I'm still confused. If he did ask for a request and got it, there's no indication and I don't know where to look, but if that was all I'd unblock. It's the other 2 accounts. Anyway, he's deleted his appeals, etc. Name withheld talk 17:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
I put it in the unblock log - UTRS #15326. He claimed he was making an article about a film of the same name and that he was inexperienced, so he simply named himself after the film. I AGF'd and all that but I didn't know he was a sockmaster. Name withheld 17:52, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Ok, thanks. Name withheld talk 18:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)"
My take on the above.
It is great to see them doing their job so well.
I am a "SOCK MASTER".
Please bear in mind, it says in their terms and conditions that having multiple accounts is not against wikipedia policy and is only against wikipedia policy if they are being used for illegitimate purposes.
Also bear in mind, Nevets3 and 4 where created within 5 minutes of eachother and WHERE NEVER USED.
The username which was made only minutes after the first two was the one got blocked because they suspected i was promoting the aids denialist group.
And Nevets20, well they already know about Nevets20.
So which one of those accounts then have i used a sock puppet account to cause a violation? appart from the account where the username was identical to the article, i have made no violations. Infact two of the accounts i forgot about and never used.
So hurrah, i am a "SockMASTER".
My experience on wikipedia has been complete HELL
(Rant over....apologies to anyone that had to read all that)
I am an ex conspiracy theorist. I first got into conspiracy around 2009. However by 2012 i was verging on conspiracy Skepticism and by 2016 i am relatively active in trying to bring to light some of the dangers of conspiracy. I have come to the realisation that certain guru's are not just harmless crackpots like many regard them. But are actually quite dangerous madmen. Especially when it come to Anti-vaccination, Aids denialism, alternative cures ect. They are dangerous, and they kill people and they make money out of selling alternative cures that cost more than conventional cures, and on top of that, they dont work.
Anyway, i am not here to bash you with my enlightenment and my over arrogance, i am here to tell you about my wikipedia hell.
Wikipedia has for years been a great tool for me to get information to help me tackle conspiracy believers in debate. I am unbeaten over at debate.org. Not because i am intelligent, but because i get all my information from wikipedia. I have you editors to thank for my 100% unbeaten record in debates for points.
Now i perhaps stupidly had an inclination to make an article regarding HIV denialism, and as an admirer of Wikipedia i thought what better place to try get the information out there.
So for the first time ever i decided to create a wikipedia account.
It was perhaps a stupid mistake, especially being my first post. It was always going to be hard to remain neutral given that i am a hardcore opponent of aids denialism, and no matter how hard i try to be neutral, it is always going to shine through that i am an opponent of aids denialism.
Anyway, i first tried the username i am most commonly known as on other forums, and it was already taken.
So i tried "Illuminati". Already taken. Tried "Itanimulli", already taken. I then tried my name backwards, and that was already taken.
I tried my name backwards adding a 1. Already taken.
Added a 2. Already taken.
Finally, i added a 3, and hallelujah, i had just created my first account.
I then logged out of the account to make sure i could log back in again, and when i did i got a message saying password not recognised. (Maybe i made a typo). But instead of trying again, i just created another account and called it "Nevets4".
So, i went and i began trying to work out how you create an article, and i got to work.
However i noticed at the top of the page was my username, "Nevets4" and i did not want my username at the top of my article.
For example, when i am using wikipedia, and i am on a page called "Aids denialism" ususally at the top of the page is "Aids denialism".
So, i began trying to work out how to replace my username with the name i want to head my article with, and i could find noway of doing this. (Please remember this is my first 5-10mins of ever being having an account with Wikipedia).
So, not realising then that just because it is my username that as at the top of my article while creating it, does not mean that is what the article will be called when created, i logged back out, and created a username that was identical to what i wanted to call my article.
So i spent several hours on my article. Not doing a great job, as i was just eager to get my first ever article onto wikipedia, or at least find out how the place works. I admit the article was not in the least bit worthy of inclusion, and not surprisingly it got rejected.
What i was surprised about, was one of the reasons it got rejected.
It got rejected because they had noticed that my username was the same as my article (Not a hard thing to notice) and this suggested to them that i was using the account for promotional purposes or was in some way affiliated with the group i was writing about.
I was surprised at this, because i am a hard-core opponent of Aids denialism and the group i was discussing in the article are Aids denialists and my article was not favourable to them in the slightest, so i was suprised how anyone reading the article could possibally get the impression i am affiliated with the group.
Anyway, it was not long before i received a message telling me i was blocked from editing. The reasons given for my block where the same as above. They suspect that i am affiliated with the Aids denialist group. (Although i got the impression that whoever looked at the article had not taken much time to read it, if they got the impression i was speaking favouraby about this Aids denialist group).
So i then went through the painstaking process of trying to get unblocked.
The person that blocked me put on my template some advice on how i can appeal.
However whenever i clicked on the link, it would just bring to a page with stacks of advice and information, and whenever i came to something a link that actually worked, it would not let me make my appeal as i would just get a message saying "You are blocked from editing".
WOW, i thought. they give me a link to make an appeal but i cant actually make the appeal because making the appeal would mean writing, and i am blocked from writing.
So, pulling my hair out i kept trying, and trying, and trying. (By this time i have forgot all about Nevets3 and Nevets4...And i think i just assumed for some reason those accounts would have got merged in with my new-one anyway)
Finally, probably by fluke, i doubt i could even find it again, i found something and was able to make contact with someoene at last, Hallelujah.
So i requested i become unblocked and requested a new username.
Almost instantly, i received an email from wikipedia telling me "We cant authorise this account just now because you are blocked" and they sent me a link, and it was the very same link that the admin who had blocked me, sent me. Aghhhhhhhhhhhhhhr.
Getting a little exasperated now, i just emailed back, saying "Look ect ect ect...Cant you just give me a link to an appeals department or simply just close my old account and give me a new one without all this sifting through pages and pages and pages and pages of information with little final resolution.
I then went to the new username i had requested "Nevets30" and i tried to log in with it, and i was quite surprised when it gave me access.
I then went to my page, just to be utterly dejected when i received a message on my page telling me "This account is blocked".
I assumed that it was a URL block.
I then went to Sandbox a little time later, and i suddenly found out i was able to edit.
I went back to my user page and the message telling me i was blocked had dissapeared. So what do you think i assumed? i assumed that my "Email reply" had been accepted and that they had afterall just decided to scrap my old account and reward me with my requested ne username.
So, i got about editing.
I did not even bother going back to my old article, i had dropped it from my agenda as i knew i could not write it in a neutral way.
So i just got about editing.
I made 9 or 10 edits. All of which remained on wikipedia and never got removed, so i can only assume that they were accepted as accurate with a verifiable source.
I received no complaints about my editing.
Then, i did an edit on the CIA page. It was not 100% favourable to the CIA, and it was regarding one of their controversies, and straight away within seconds this was removed, and i had the person that removed it on my page, not telling me that my information was wrong, but telling me that he had removed my edit because i was not allowed to edit as i have a blocked sock puppet account.
Eh? i thought. I then received several other messages, and could see he was making several complaints to admins, calling me a "gamer" "sock puppet" ect.
I went to sleep, not worried, and in the morning when i woke up, i logged in and was so dissapointed to see that one of the admins had taken his claim seriously and decided i was infact a sock puppet with a blocked username.
So i went about trying to explain myself, and finally managed to find a way of appealing my block (which i thought had already been resolved) and i was given a ticket number and i stated my case...forgetting about Nevets3 & 4)
After several hours i received a reply telling me i was unblocked to request a change of username. (dont know why she could not just have closed the account and let me have Nevets20...but hey ho)
So i went about trying to find out how you request a new username. Sifting through endless pages of informations.
Then after about 1 hour, a message suddenly popped up telling me i am blocked again because she had just found out about Nevets 3 & 4 and told me i am "A SOCK MASTER".
Below is a brief conversation i found about me between admins
"The editor has 3 other accounts which I blocked recently as socks. If you look at this version of the talk page for Nevets20[5] you'll see ". I then put in a change name "request" [ACC #164445]". When I blocked I knew nothing about this, and he/she still hasn't mentioned the other 2 accounts User:Nevets3 and User:Nevets4. name withheld talk 16:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
@Name withheld: Oh, good grief. All I could see was a username hardblock. I didn't know anything about this either. Do you want to reblock or should I? Katietalk 16:37, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Never mind - I reblocked as the sock master since you tagged the others that way. name withheld 17:09, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, but I'm still confused. If he did ask for a request and got it, there's no indication and I don't know where to look, but if that was all I'd unblock. It's the other 2 accounts. Anyway, he's deleted his appeals, etc. Name withheld talk 17:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
I put it in the unblock log - UTRS #15326. He claimed he was making an article about a film of the same name and that he was inexperienced, so he simply named himself after the film. I AGF'd and all that but I didn't know he was a sockmaster. Name withheld 17:52, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Ok, thanks. Name withheld talk 18:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)"
My take on the above.
It is great to see them doing their job so well.
I am a "SOCK MASTER".
Please bear in mind, it says in their terms and conditions that having multiple accounts is not against wikipedia policy and is only against wikipedia policy if they are being used for illegitimate purposes.
Also bear in mind, Nevets3 and 4 where created within 5 minutes of eachother and WHERE NEVER USED.
The username which was made only minutes after the first two was the one got blocked because they suspected i was promoting the aids denialist group.
And Nevets20, well they already know about Nevets20.
So which one of those accounts then have i used a sock puppet account to cause a violation? appart from the account where the username was identical to the article, i have made no violations. Infact two of the accounts i forgot about and never used.
So hurrah, i am a "SockMASTER".
My experience on wikipedia has been complete HELL
(Rant over....apologies to anyone that had to read all that)