The e-cigarette war


User avatar
The Joy
Habitué
Posts: 2606
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 6:20 am
Wikipedia Review Member: The Joy

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by The Joy » Sun Sep 13, 2015 11:31 pm

A decision should have been made on September 1st. What on earth is causing the delay?
"In the long run, volunteers are the most expensive workers you'll ever have." -Red Green

"Is it your thesis that my avatar in this MMPONWMG was mugged?" -Moulton

User avatar
SB_Johnny
Habitué
Posts: 4640
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:26 am
Wikipedia User: SB_Johnny
Wikipedia Review Member: SB_Johnny

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by SB_Johnny » Mon Sep 14, 2015 12:25 am

The Joy wrote:
A decision should have been made on September 1st. What on earth is causing the delay?
Perhaps we're finally seeing the day where even the Arbitration Committee members have realized that the rest of life is more important than Wikidrama, and just don't spend all of their free time suffering fools and foolishness? :shrug:
This is not a signature.

User avatar
Randy from Boise
Been Around Forever
Posts: 12245
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:32 am
Wikipedia User: Carrite
Wikipedia Review Member: Timbo
Actual Name: Tim Davenport
Nom de plume: T. Chandler
Location: Boise, Idaho

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by Randy from Boise » Mon Sep 14, 2015 5:00 am

SB_Johnny wrote:
The Joy wrote:
A decision should have been made on September 1st. What on earth is causing the delay?
Perhaps we're finally seeing the day where even the Arbitration Committee members have realized that the rest of life is more important than Wikidrama, and just don't spend all of their free time suffering fools and foolishness? :shrug:
What are people gonna do, take them to ArbCom for blowing off deadlines???

It seems that every successive ArbCom does a worse and worse job of it. Lightbreather was left dangling in the wind for over a month.

RfB

Cla68
Habitué
Posts: 2389
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:43 pm
Wikipedia User: Cla68

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by Cla68 » Mon Sep 14, 2015 6:37 am

Randy from Boise wrote:
SB_Johnny wrote:
The Joy wrote:
A decision should have been made on September 1st. What on earth is causing the delay?
Perhaps we're finally seeing the day where even the Arbitration Committee members have realized that the rest of life is more important than Wikidrama, and just don't spend all of their free time suffering fools and foolishness? :shrug:
What are people gonna do, take them to ArbCom for blowing off deadlines???

It seems that every successive ArbCom does a worse and worse job of it. Lightbreather was left dangling in the wind for over a month.

RfB
With as much money as the WMF has, you would think they could pay ArbCom members a salary so they could do this full time? Of course, the WMF wouldn't do that because it would expose them to liability for what takes place in WP and also it would force them to pay salaries to the ArbCom members of ALL the language Wikipedias.

MMAR
Banned
Posts: 735
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2015 2:54 pm
Wikipedia User: Mighty Morphin Army Ranger

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by MMAR » Mon Sep 14, 2015 12:26 pm

It's a disgrace how long Wikipedia's coverage of e-cigs has been allowed to be ridiculously over-cautious. While their inherent safety might still be in doubt compared to not using them at all, you'd have to be a complete and utter moron to think that you're not doing any actual smoker any harm by hinting to them through Wikipedia that maybe they shouldn't switch because of all the 'unknown unknowns'. For failing to control the tiny few activists who have done this, considering what we do know about the risks of continued smoking, Wikipedia definitely has blood on its hands.

User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way
Contact:

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by Poetlister » Mon Sep 14, 2015 4:03 pm

Cla68 wrote:and also it would force them to pay salaries to the ArbCom members of ALL the language Wikipedias.
Worse, they might even have to pay the Wikinews ArbCom, where only three people voted in the last election.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

MMAR
Banned
Posts: 735
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2015 2:54 pm
Wikipedia User: Mighty Morphin Army Ranger

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by MMAR » Mon Sep 14, 2015 5:17 pm

Mandate-tastic.

User avatar
The Joy
Habitué
Posts: 2606
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 6:20 am
Wikipedia Review Member: The Joy

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by The Joy » Mon Sep 14, 2015 6:21 pm

Cla68 wrote:
Randy from Boise wrote:
SB_Johnny wrote:
The Joy wrote:
A decision should have been made on September 1st. What on earth is causing the delay?
Perhaps we're finally seeing the day where even the Arbitration Committee members have realized that the rest of life is more important than Wikidrama, and just don't spend all of their free time suffering fools and foolishness? :shrug:
What are people gonna do, take them to ArbCom for blowing off deadlines???

It seems that every successive ArbCom does a worse and worse job of it. Lightbreather was left dangling in the wind for over a month.

RfB
With as much money as the WMF has, you would think they could pay ArbCom members a salary so they could do this full time? Of course, the WMF wouldn't do that because it would expose them to liability for what takes place in WP and also it would force them to pay salaries to the ArbCom members of ALL the language Wikipedias.
Maybe the WMF could offer Arbcom discounts to their store products as long as they work hard. Not working and meeting deadlines!? No 10% discount on your "Wikipedia content policies plantable pencils!"

https://store.wikimedia.org/products/wi ... ils-3-pack

(We need a separate thread on those absurd store products. Why on earth would I want to plant a pencil except into some wiki-jerk's eye? :blink: )
"In the long run, volunteers are the most expensive workers you'll ever have." -Red Green

"Is it your thesis that my avatar in this MMPONWMG was mugged?" -Moulton

User avatar
Drijfzand
Critic
Posts: 169
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2015 12:33 pm
Location: Belgium

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by Drijfzand » Thu Oct 15, 2015 6:15 am

Interesting tactics used by QuackGuru. Keeps people from commenting on his talk page by using a red link in his signature, and nominates his own articles for deletion, for example here and here.
The net result is a "speedy keep" notice on the talk page (This page was nominated for deletion on .... The result of the discussion was speedy keep.) which will likely discourage other editors from trying AfD.
Tweaker in Metropolis

User avatar
Kelly Martin
Habitué
Posts: 3378
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:30 am
Location: EN61bw
Contact:

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by Kelly Martin » Thu Oct 15, 2015 6:19 am

Cla68 wrote:Of course, the WMF wouldn't do that because it would expose them to liability for what takes place in WP and also it would force them to pay salaries to the ArbCom members of ALL the language Wikipedias.
It would not expose them to liability; the theory that it would is a convenient but utterly false excuse used by the WMF, and blithely accepted by Wikipedians, to justify taking no action.

NativeForeigner
Contributor
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 10:28 pm
Wikipedia User: NativeForeigner
Wikipedia Review Member: NativeForeigner

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by NativeForeigner » Thu Oct 15, 2015 6:48 am

The Joy wrote:
Cla68 wrote:
Randy from Boise wrote:
SB_Johnny wrote:
The Joy wrote:
A decision should have been made on September 1st. What on earth is causing the delay?
Perhaps we're finally seeing the day where even the Arbitration Committee members have realized that the rest of life is more important than Wikidrama, and just don't spend all of their free time suffering fools and foolishness? :shrug:
What are people gonna do, take them to ArbCom for blowing off deadlines???

It seems that every successive ArbCom does a worse and worse job of it. Lightbreather was left dangling in the wind for over a month.

RfB
With as much money as the WMF has, you would think they could pay ArbCom members a salary so they could do this full time? Of course, the WMF wouldn't do that because it would expose them to liability for what takes place in WP and also it would force them to pay salaries to the ArbCom members of ALL the language Wikipedias.
Maybe the WMF could offer Arbcom discounts to their store products as long as they work hard. Not working and meeting deadlines!? No 10% discount on your "Wikipedia content policies plantable pencils!"

https://store.wikimedia.org/products/wi ... ils-3-pack

(We need a separate thread on those absurd store products. Why on earth would I want to plant a pencil except into some wiki-jerk's eye? :blink: )
Made me laugh. I guess the check's in the mail...

I will say meeting a couple other arbs in DC was probably a lot more productive thna a week or two on mailing list. Funny how that works.

ferongr
Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 2:24 pm
Location: Greece

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by ferongr » Thu Nov 19, 2015 1:10 pm

The ArbCom case is closed. QuackGuru (T-C-L) gets a slap on the wrist, Doc James' friend/student CFCF (T-C-L) gets a slightly harder slap on the wrist and AlbinoFerret (T-C-L), who had a 6-month self ban started an ARCA to submit evidence against Quacky and Cloudjpk (T-C-L) who seems to be linked to Quackguru. The article remains in a terrible state 1 year after I first started reading it.

Disclosure: I'm not a Wikipedia editor, I'm just a vaper and my first contact with Wikipediocracy and Wikipedia internal processes in general was when researching who where the different names on this article's talkpage, most notably Quackguru who even to a noob like me seemed to be behaving and editing strangely, and Doc James who made some personal statements a "scientist" would not had made. I cannot claim to be unbiased, I'm just interested in watching the article's development, in parallel with the media battles raging with regards to vaping.

User avatar
Jim
Blue Meanie
Posts: 4955
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:33 am
Wikipedia User: Begoon
Wikipedia Review Member: Jim
Location: NSW

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by Jim » Thu Nov 19, 2015 1:41 pm

ferongr wrote:The ArbCom case is closed. QuackGuru (T-C-L) gets a slap on the wrist, Doc James' friend/student CFCF (T-C-L) gets a slightly harder slap on the wrist and AlbinoFerret (T-C-L), who had a 6-month self ban started an ARCA to submit evidence against Quacky and Cloudjpk (T-C-L) who seems to be linked to Quackguru. The article remains in a terrible state 1 year after I first started reading it.

Disclosure: I'm not a Wikipedia editor, I'm just a vaper and my first contact with Wikipediocracy and Wikipedia internal processes in general was when researching who where the different names on this article's talkpage, most notably Quackguru who even to a noob like me seemed to be behaving and editing strangely, and Doc James who made some personal statements a "scientist" would not had made. I cannot claim to be unbiased, I'm just interested in watching the article's development, in parallel with the media battles raging with regards to vaping.
Well, :welcome: , ferongr.

On wikipedia, you'd be blocked as a "sock" for "using templates on your first edit". It's not like that here.

Do those e-cig things really work? Genuinely asking.

ferongr
Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 2:24 pm
Location: Greece

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by ferongr » Thu Nov 19, 2015 1:55 pm

I had my first cigarette-free anniversary yesterday. I used to be a 2 pack-a-day smoker before. I'd say they've worked for me and my father, who started using e-cigarettes mainly for the financial aspect (he went from spending 200€/mo on cigarettes to spending 10-20€ on eliquid that I mix for him. Subjectively, my respiratory system feels a lot better.

User avatar
Jim
Blue Meanie
Posts: 4955
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:33 am
Wikipedia User: Begoon
Wikipedia Review Member: Jim
Location: NSW

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by Jim » Thu Nov 19, 2015 2:01 pm

ferongr wrote:I had my first cigarette-free anniversary yesterday. I used to be a 2 pack-a-day smoker before. I'd say they've worked for me and my father, who started using e-cigarettes mainly for the financial aspect (he went from spending 200€/mo on cigarettes to spending 10-20€ on eliquid that I mix for him. Subjectively, my respiratory system feels a lot better.
Thank you. You did more than just answer the (poor) question I asked, by relating it to real people. What's eliquid?

ats
Regular
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2015 12:52 pm

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by ats » Thu Nov 19, 2015 4:03 pm

Jim wrote: What's eliquid?
Its basically a mixture of water and nicotine that generally has other aromatics and flavorings added to it. It is basically what is used to form the vapor that a user "smokes" with an ecig.

User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way
Contact:

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by Poetlister » Thu Nov 19, 2015 8:55 pm

ferongr wrote:I had my first cigarette-free anniversary yesterday. I used to be a 2 pack-a-day smoker before. I'd say they've worked for me and my father, who started using e-cigarettes mainly for the financial aspect (he went from spending 200€/mo on cigarettes to spending 10-20€ on eliquid that I mix for him. Subjectively, my respiratory system feels a lot better.
Had you tried anything else before, like nicotine chewing gum?
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

ferongr
Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 2:24 pm
Location: Greece

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by ferongr » Thu Nov 19, 2015 9:29 pm

I tried chewing gum in the past with minimal results. During the last of my 5 day nic gum adventure, I was going through them at such a high rate that my mouth muscles hurt from all that chewing. I was also slightly agitated and managed to destroy two ballpoint pens by chewing on them. A different attempt with patches lasted only two days. They were kinda worse from a feeling perspective (nothing to occupy my mouth). I couldn't afford to pay for sessions in a clinic specializing in smoking cessation so I can't comment on that thing.
ats wrote:
Jim wrote: What's eliquid?
Its basically a mixture of water and nicotine that generally has other aromatics and flavorings added to it. It is basically what is used to form the vapor that a user "smokes" with an ecig.
The bulk of the ingredients in eliquid are polypropylene glycol (the dreaded "antifreeze") and vegetable glycerin, anywhere from 60 to 90% in various mixtures. Propylene glycol simulates the throat hit of a cigarette and vegetable glycerin forms visible droplets that simulate the exhaled smoke. The latter is called vapor, "aerosol" (if you want to be strictly technical and create impressions), or "cloud" (a term the lifestyle vaper scene uses). Other ingredients include a variety of flavorings in various amounts (usually anywhere around 1% to 20%, purified water (mostly to decrease the viscosity of the eliquid) and nicotine in concentrations 3.6% or lower. There are also eliquids without nicotine.

User avatar
Vigilant
Sonny, I've got a whole theme park full of red delights for you.
Posts: 31790
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:16 pm
Wikipedia User: Vigilant
Wikipedia Review Member: Vigilant

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by Vigilant » Thu Nov 19, 2015 9:33 pm

I quit smoking by refusing to buy cigarettes.

Took me about 5 attempts before I hit on the strategy that worked for me.
Hello, John. John, hello. You're the one soul I would come up here to collect myself.

Cla68
Habitué
Posts: 2389
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:43 pm
Wikipedia User: Cla68

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by Cla68 » Thu Nov 19, 2015 10:33 pm

ferongr wrote:The ArbCom case is closed. QuackGuru (T-C-L) gets a slap on the wrist, Doc James' friend/student CFCF (T-C-L) gets a slightly harder slap on the wrist and AlbinoFerret (T-C-L), who had a 6-month self ban started an ARCA to submit evidence against Quacky and Cloudjpk (T-C-L) who seems to be linked to Quackguru. The article remains in a terrible state 1 year after I first started reading it.

Disclosure: I'm not a Wikipedia editor, I'm just a vaper and my first contact with Wikipediocracy and Wikipedia internal processes in general was when researching who where the different names on this article's talkpage, most notably Quackguru who even to a noob like me seemed to be behaving and editing strangely, and Doc James who made some personal statements a "scientist" would not had made. I cannot claim to be unbiased, I'm just interested in watching the article's development, in parallel with the media battles raging with regards to vaping.
Quackguru has an account here. He can correct me if I'm wrong, but he and Doc James probably sincerely feel that they're saving humanity, whom they appear to believe are collectively a bunch of simpering idiots, from themselves by influencing their behavior and choices through biased Wikipedia articles.

User avatar
Zoloft
Trustee
Posts: 14088
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:54 pm
Wikipedia User: Stanistani
Wikipedia Review Member: Zoloft
Actual Name: William Burns
Nom de plume: William Burns
Location: San Diego
Contact:

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by Zoloft » Fri Nov 20, 2015 3:29 am

Cla68 wrote:... Quackguru has an account here. ...
Not that I know of.

My avatar is sometimes indicative of my mood:
  • Actual mug ◄
  • Uncle Cornpone
  • Zoloft bouncy pill-thing


Cla68
Habitué
Posts: 2389
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:43 pm
Wikipedia User: Cla68

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by Cla68 » Fri Nov 20, 2015 4:27 am

Zoloft wrote:
Cla68 wrote:... Quackguru has an account here. ...
Not that I know of.
OK, I think I mixed him up with RedPenOfDoom.

User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way
Contact:

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by Poetlister » Fri Nov 20, 2015 12:43 pm

Vigilant wrote:I quit smoking by refusing to buy cigarettes.

Took me about 5 attempts before I hit on the strategy that worked for me.
Everyone is different. Whatever strategy works for you is fine. I hope you feel better for quitting.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

User avatar
Vigilant
Sonny, I've got a whole theme park full of red delights for you.
Posts: 31790
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:16 pm
Wikipedia User: Vigilant
Wikipedia Review Member: Vigilant

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by Vigilant » Fri Nov 20, 2015 12:59 pm

Poetlister wrote:
Vigilant wrote:I quit smoking by refusing to buy cigarettes.

Took me about 5 attempts before I hit on the strategy that worked for me.
Everyone is different. Whatever strategy works for you is fine. I hope you feel better for quitting.
I do. It's been a couple of years now.
Hello, John. John, hello. You're the one soul I would come up here to collect myself.

ferongr
Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 2:24 pm
Location: Greece

Re: The e-cigarette war

Unread post by ferongr » Sun Dec 06, 2015 8:41 am

Quackguru (T-C-L) started an AE complaint against S Marshall (T-C-L). In the usual Quacky stream-of-consciousness editing style, he initially asks for a block on S Marshall accusing him of being an SPA. He then edits that and accuses him of socking while using some weaksauce proof. In the end, Quackguru himself ends up receiving a six month topic ban by AE from all ecig articles for continuing his shenanigans immidiately after getting warned from the Arbcom case. Fun times ahead.

Post Reply