The e-cigarette war
Re: The e-cigarette war
A decision should have been made on September 1st. What on earth is causing the delay?tarantino wrote:Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Editor conduct in e-cigs articles (T-H-L)
"In the long run, volunteers are the most expensive workers you'll ever have." -Red Green
"Is it your thesis that my avatar in this MMPONWMG was mugged?" -Moulton
"Is it your thesis that my avatar in this MMPONWMG was mugged?" -Moulton
- SB_Johnny
- Habitué
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:26 am
- Wikipedia User: SB_Johnny
- Wikipedia Review Member: SB_Johnny
Re: The e-cigarette war
Perhaps we're finally seeing the day where even the Arbitration Committee members have realized that the rest of life is more important than Wikidrama, and just don't spend all of their free time suffering fools and foolishness?The Joy wrote:A decision should have been made on September 1st. What on earth is causing the delay?tarantino wrote:Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Editor conduct in e-cigs articles (T-H-L)
This is not a signature.✌
- Randy from Boise
- Been Around Forever
- Posts: 12245
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:32 am
- Wikipedia User: Carrite
- Wikipedia Review Member: Timbo
- Actual Name: Tim Davenport
- Nom de plume: T. Chandler
- Location: Boise, Idaho
Re: The e-cigarette war
What are people gonna do, take them to ArbCom for blowing off deadlines???SB_Johnny wrote:Perhaps we're finally seeing the day where even the Arbitration Committee members have realized that the rest of life is more important than Wikidrama, and just don't spend all of their free time suffering fools and foolishness?The Joy wrote:A decision should have been made on September 1st. What on earth is causing the delay?tarantino wrote:Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Editor conduct in e-cigs articles (T-H-L)
It seems that every successive ArbCom does a worse and worse job of it. Lightbreather was left dangling in the wind for over a month.
RfB
Re: The e-cigarette war
With as much money as the WMF has, you would think they could pay ArbCom members a salary so they could do this full time? Of course, the WMF wouldn't do that because it would expose them to liability for what takes place in WP and also it would force them to pay salaries to the ArbCom members of ALL the language Wikipedias.Randy from Boise wrote:What are people gonna do, take them to ArbCom for blowing off deadlines???SB_Johnny wrote:Perhaps we're finally seeing the day where even the Arbitration Committee members have realized that the rest of life is more important than Wikidrama, and just don't spend all of their free time suffering fools and foolishness?The Joy wrote:A decision should have been made on September 1st. What on earth is causing the delay?tarantino wrote:Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Editor conduct in e-cigs articles (T-H-L)
It seems that every successive ArbCom does a worse and worse job of it. Lightbreather was left dangling in the wind for over a month.
RfB
Re: The e-cigarette war
It's a disgrace how long Wikipedia's coverage of e-cigs has been allowed to be ridiculously over-cautious. While their inherent safety might still be in doubt compared to not using them at all, you'd have to be a complete and utter moron to think that you're not doing any actual smoker any harm by hinting to them through Wikipedia that maybe they shouldn't switch because of all the 'unknown unknowns'. For failing to control the tiny few activists who have done this, considering what we do know about the risks of continued smoking, Wikipedia definitely has blood on its hands.
- Poetlister
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
- Contact:
Re: The e-cigarette war
Worse, they might even have to pay the Wikinews ArbCom, where only three people voted in the last election.Cla68 wrote:and also it would force them to pay salaries to the ArbCom members of ALL the language Wikipedias.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
Re: The e-cigarette war
Mandate-tastic.
Re: The e-cigarette war
Maybe the WMF could offer Arbcom discounts to their store products as long as they work hard. Not working and meeting deadlines!? No 10% discount on your "Wikipedia content policies plantable pencils!"Cla68 wrote:With as much money as the WMF has, you would think they could pay ArbCom members a salary so they could do this full time? Of course, the WMF wouldn't do that because it would expose them to liability for what takes place in WP and also it would force them to pay salaries to the ArbCom members of ALL the language Wikipedias.Randy from Boise wrote:What are people gonna do, take them to ArbCom for blowing off deadlines???SB_Johnny wrote:Perhaps we're finally seeing the day where even the Arbitration Committee members have realized that the rest of life is more important than Wikidrama, and just don't spend all of their free time suffering fools and foolishness?The Joy wrote:A decision should have been made on September 1st. What on earth is causing the delay?tarantino wrote:Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Editor conduct in e-cigs articles (T-H-L)
It seems that every successive ArbCom does a worse and worse job of it. Lightbreather was left dangling in the wind for over a month.
RfB
https://store.wikimedia.org/products/wi ... ils-3-pack
(We need a separate thread on those absurd store products. Why on earth would I want to plant a pencil except into some wiki-jerk's eye? )
"In the long run, volunteers are the most expensive workers you'll ever have." -Red Green
"Is it your thesis that my avatar in this MMPONWMG was mugged?" -Moulton
"Is it your thesis that my avatar in this MMPONWMG was mugged?" -Moulton
Re: The e-cigarette war
Interesting tactics used by QuackGuru. Keeps people from commenting on his talk page by using a red link in his signature, and nominates his own articles for deletion, for example here and here.
The net result is a "speedy keep" notice on the talk page (This page was nominated for deletion on .... The result of the discussion was speedy keep.) which will likely discourage other editors from trying AfD.
The net result is a "speedy keep" notice on the talk page (This page was nominated for deletion on .... The result of the discussion was speedy keep.) which will likely discourage other editors from trying AfD.
Tweaker in Metropolis
- Kelly Martin
- Habitué
- Posts: 3378
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:30 am
- Location: EN61bw
- Contact:
Re: The e-cigarette war
It would not expose them to liability; the theory that it would is a convenient but utterly false excuse used by the WMF, and blithely accepted by Wikipedians, to justify taking no action.Cla68 wrote:Of course, the WMF wouldn't do that because it would expose them to liability for what takes place in WP and also it would force them to pay salaries to the ArbCom members of ALL the language Wikipedias.
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 10:28 pm
- Wikipedia User: NativeForeigner
- Wikipedia Review Member: NativeForeigner
Re: The e-cigarette war
Made me laugh. I guess the check's in the mail...The Joy wrote:Maybe the WMF could offer Arbcom discounts to their store products as long as they work hard. Not working and meeting deadlines!? No 10% discount on your "Wikipedia content policies plantable pencils!"Cla68 wrote:With as much money as the WMF has, you would think they could pay ArbCom members a salary so they could do this full time? Of course, the WMF wouldn't do that because it would expose them to liability for what takes place in WP and also it would force them to pay salaries to the ArbCom members of ALL the language Wikipedias.Randy from Boise wrote:What are people gonna do, take them to ArbCom for blowing off deadlines???SB_Johnny wrote:Perhaps we're finally seeing the day where even the Arbitration Committee members have realized that the rest of life is more important than Wikidrama, and just don't spend all of their free time suffering fools and foolishness?The Joy wrote:A decision should have been made on September 1st. What on earth is causing the delay?tarantino wrote:Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Editor conduct in e-cigs articles (T-H-L)
It seems that every successive ArbCom does a worse and worse job of it. Lightbreather was left dangling in the wind for over a month.
RfB
https://store.wikimedia.org/products/wi ... ils-3-pack
(We need a separate thread on those absurd store products. Why on earth would I want to plant a pencil except into some wiki-jerk's eye? )
I will say meeting a couple other arbs in DC was probably a lot more productive thna a week or two on mailing list. Funny how that works.
Re: The e-cigarette war
The ArbCom case is closed. QuackGuru (T-C-L) gets a slap on the wrist, Doc James' friend/student CFCF (T-C-L) gets a slightly harder slap on the wrist and AlbinoFerret (T-C-L), who had a 6-month self ban started an ARCA to submit evidence against Quacky and Cloudjpk (T-C-L) who seems to be linked to Quackguru. The article remains in a terrible state 1 year after I first started reading it.
Disclosure: I'm not a Wikipedia editor, I'm just a vaper and my first contact with Wikipediocracy and Wikipedia internal processes in general was when researching who where the different names on this article's talkpage, most notably Quackguru who even to a noob like me seemed to be behaving and editing strangely, and Doc James who made some personal statements a "scientist" would not had made. I cannot claim to be unbiased, I'm just interested in watching the article's development, in parallel with the media battles raging with regards to vaping.
Disclosure: I'm not a Wikipedia editor, I'm just a vaper and my first contact with Wikipediocracy and Wikipedia internal processes in general was when researching who where the different names on this article's talkpage, most notably Quackguru who even to a noob like me seemed to be behaving and editing strangely, and Doc James who made some personal statements a "scientist" would not had made. I cannot claim to be unbiased, I'm just interested in watching the article's development, in parallel with the media battles raging with regards to vaping.
- Jim
- Blue Meanie
- Posts: 4955
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:33 am
- Wikipedia User: Begoon
- Wikipedia Review Member: Jim
- Location: NSW
Re: The e-cigarette war
Well, , ferongr.ferongr wrote:The ArbCom case is closed. QuackGuru (T-C-L) gets a slap on the wrist, Doc James' friend/student CFCF (T-C-L) gets a slightly harder slap on the wrist and AlbinoFerret (T-C-L), who had a 6-month self ban started an ARCA to submit evidence against Quacky and Cloudjpk (T-C-L) who seems to be linked to Quackguru. The article remains in a terrible state 1 year after I first started reading it.
Disclosure: I'm not a Wikipedia editor, I'm just a vaper and my first contact with Wikipediocracy and Wikipedia internal processes in general was when researching who where the different names on this article's talkpage, most notably Quackguru who even to a noob like me seemed to be behaving and editing strangely, and Doc James who made some personal statements a "scientist" would not had made. I cannot claim to be unbiased, I'm just interested in watching the article's development, in parallel with the media battles raging with regards to vaping.
On wikipedia, you'd be blocked as a "sock" for "using templates on your first edit". It's not like that here.
Do those e-cig things really work? Genuinely asking.
Re: The e-cigarette war
I had my first cigarette-free anniversary yesterday. I used to be a 2 pack-a-day smoker before. I'd say they've worked for me and my father, who started using e-cigarettes mainly for the financial aspect (he went from spending 200€/mo on cigarettes to spending 10-20€ on eliquid that I mix for him. Subjectively, my respiratory system feels a lot better.
- Jim
- Blue Meanie
- Posts: 4955
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:33 am
- Wikipedia User: Begoon
- Wikipedia Review Member: Jim
- Location: NSW
Re: The e-cigarette war
Thank you. You did more than just answer the (poor) question I asked, by relating it to real people. What's eliquid?ferongr wrote:I had my first cigarette-free anniversary yesterday. I used to be a 2 pack-a-day smoker before. I'd say they've worked for me and my father, who started using e-cigarettes mainly for the financial aspect (he went from spending 200€/mo on cigarettes to spending 10-20€ on eliquid that I mix for him. Subjectively, my respiratory system feels a lot better.
Re: The e-cigarette war
Its basically a mixture of water and nicotine that generally has other aromatics and flavorings added to it. It is basically what is used to form the vapor that a user "smokes" with an ecig.Jim wrote: What's eliquid?
- Poetlister
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
- Contact:
Re: The e-cigarette war
Had you tried anything else before, like nicotine chewing gum?ferongr wrote:I had my first cigarette-free anniversary yesterday. I used to be a 2 pack-a-day smoker before. I'd say they've worked for me and my father, who started using e-cigarettes mainly for the financial aspect (he went from spending 200€/mo on cigarettes to spending 10-20€ on eliquid that I mix for him. Subjectively, my respiratory system feels a lot better.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
Re: The e-cigarette war
I tried chewing gum in the past with minimal results. During the last of my 5 day nic gum adventure, I was going through them at such a high rate that my mouth muscles hurt from all that chewing. I was also slightly agitated and managed to destroy two ballpoint pens by chewing on them. A different attempt with patches lasted only two days. They were kinda worse from a feeling perspective (nothing to occupy my mouth). I couldn't afford to pay for sessions in a clinic specializing in smoking cessation so I can't comment on that thing.
The bulk of the ingredients in eliquid are polypropylene glycol (the dreaded "antifreeze") and vegetable glycerin, anywhere from 60 to 90% in various mixtures. Propylene glycol simulates the throat hit of a cigarette and vegetable glycerin forms visible droplets that simulate the exhaled smoke. The latter is called vapor, "aerosol" (if you want to be strictly technical and create impressions), or "cloud" (a term the lifestyle vaper scene uses). Other ingredients include a variety of flavorings in various amounts (usually anywhere around 1% to 20%, purified water (mostly to decrease the viscosity of the eliquid) and nicotine in concentrations 3.6% or lower. There are also eliquids without nicotine.ats wrote:Its basically a mixture of water and nicotine that generally has other aromatics and flavorings added to it. It is basically what is used to form the vapor that a user "smokes" with an ecig.Jim wrote: What's eliquid?
- Vigilant
- Sonny, I've got a whole theme park full of red delights for you.
- Posts: 31790
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:16 pm
- Wikipedia User: Vigilant
- Wikipedia Review Member: Vigilant
Re: The e-cigarette war
I quit smoking by refusing to buy cigarettes.
Took me about 5 attempts before I hit on the strategy that worked for me.
Took me about 5 attempts before I hit on the strategy that worked for me.
Hello, John. John, hello. You're the one soul I would come up here to collect myself.
Re: The e-cigarette war
Quackguru has an account here. He can correct me if I'm wrong, but he and Doc James probably sincerely feel that they're saving humanity, whom they appear to believe are collectively a bunch of simpering idiots, from themselves by influencing their behavior and choices through biased Wikipedia articles.ferongr wrote:The ArbCom case is closed. QuackGuru (T-C-L) gets a slap on the wrist, Doc James' friend/student CFCF (T-C-L) gets a slightly harder slap on the wrist and AlbinoFerret (T-C-L), who had a 6-month self ban started an ARCA to submit evidence against Quacky and Cloudjpk (T-C-L) who seems to be linked to Quackguru. The article remains in a terrible state 1 year after I first started reading it.
Disclosure: I'm not a Wikipedia editor, I'm just a vaper and my first contact with Wikipediocracy and Wikipedia internal processes in general was when researching who where the different names on this article's talkpage, most notably Quackguru who even to a noob like me seemed to be behaving and editing strangely, and Doc James who made some personal statements a "scientist" would not had made. I cannot claim to be unbiased, I'm just interested in watching the article's development, in parallel with the media battles raging with regards to vaping.
- Zoloft
- Trustee
- Posts: 14088
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:54 pm
- Wikipedia User: Stanistani
- Wikipedia Review Member: Zoloft
- Actual Name: William Burns
- Nom de plume: William Burns
- Location: San Diego
- Contact:
Re: The e-cigarette war
Not that I know of.Cla68 wrote:... Quackguru has an account here. ...
My avatar is sometimes indicative of my mood:
- Actual mug ◄
- Uncle Cornpone
- Zoloft bouncy pill-thing
Re: The e-cigarette war
OK, I think I mixed him up with RedPenOfDoom.Zoloft wrote:Not that I know of.Cla68 wrote:... Quackguru has an account here. ...
- Poetlister
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
- Contact:
Re: The e-cigarette war
Everyone is different. Whatever strategy works for you is fine. I hope you feel better for quitting.Vigilant wrote:I quit smoking by refusing to buy cigarettes.
Took me about 5 attempts before I hit on the strategy that worked for me.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche
- Vigilant
- Sonny, I've got a whole theme park full of red delights for you.
- Posts: 31790
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:16 pm
- Wikipedia User: Vigilant
- Wikipedia Review Member: Vigilant
Re: The e-cigarette war
I do. It's been a couple of years now.Poetlister wrote:Everyone is different. Whatever strategy works for you is fine. I hope you feel better for quitting.Vigilant wrote:I quit smoking by refusing to buy cigarettes.
Took me about 5 attempts before I hit on the strategy that worked for me.
Hello, John. John, hello. You're the one soul I would come up here to collect myself.
Re: The e-cigarette war
Quackguru (T-C-L) started an AE complaint against S Marshall (T-C-L). In the usual Quacky stream-of-consciousness editing style, he initially asks for a block on S Marshall accusing him of being an SPA. He then edits that and accuses him of socking while using some weaksauce proof. In the end, Quackguru himself ends up receiving a six month topic ban by AE from all ecig articles for continuing his shenanigans immidiately after getting warned from the Arbcom case. Fun times ahead.