In which WeijiBaikeBianji reports me at AE
Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2014 1:02 am
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... tain_Occam
The odd thing about this report is that I've been indefinitely site-banned since May 2012, and have had no talk page access since March 2013. At this stage, what additional sanctions does he think I could be under?
The background here is that for around a year, newbies who generally don't know what they're doing have been showing up in the race and intelligence topic, and I've somehow acquired a reputation as someone who can give them valuable advice. In some cases I can't figure out how these people know anything about me: one typical example of that was here. But in any case, when they ask me for advice I generally don't turn them down. A lot of the advice I give them is pretty banal stuff, such as not edit warring or how NPOV policy works.
By the beginning of this month, I'd given essentially the same advice to so many different people that I decided to write up some of it in a blog post. The important point here is that all of these newbies would be participating in race and intelligence articles no matter what. As long as they're doing that, I think it's better for them to be educated about how not to be disruptive.
WeijiBaikeBianji seems to be upset that in the comments to that post, several of the newbies identified him as one of the worse examples of POV-pushers on these articles. This wasn't something I encouraged, but it's still probably accurate. If he didn't want them doing that, maybe he should have tried harder to edit these articles in a neutral manner.
The odd thing about this report is that I've been indefinitely site-banned since May 2012, and have had no talk page access since March 2013. At this stage, what additional sanctions does he think I could be under?
The background here is that for around a year, newbies who generally don't know what they're doing have been showing up in the race and intelligence topic, and I've somehow acquired a reputation as someone who can give them valuable advice. In some cases I can't figure out how these people know anything about me: one typical example of that was here. But in any case, when they ask me for advice I generally don't turn them down. A lot of the advice I give them is pretty banal stuff, such as not edit warring or how NPOV policy works.
By the beginning of this month, I'd given essentially the same advice to so many different people that I decided to write up some of it in a blog post. The important point here is that all of these newbies would be participating in race and intelligence articles no matter what. As long as they're doing that, I think it's better for them to be educated about how not to be disruptive.
WeijiBaikeBianji seems to be upset that in the comments to that post, several of the newbies identified him as one of the worse examples of POV-pushers on these articles. This wasn't something I encouraged, but it's still probably accurate. If he didn't want them doing that, maybe he should have tried harder to edit these articles in a neutral manner.