Would "bitches" allow russavia back?

neved · Unread post by **neved** » Sun Jun 08, 2014 11:27 pm

The last time Russavia (T-C-L) came back after being blocked for almost a year, screaming "hey bitches i'm back"
So the question is if "bitches" would allow russavia back this time too?
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit ... ck_request

Unblock request

Orologio blu.svg
This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Russavia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:
I'd like to propose that the block on myself be lifted. I was blocked in June 2013, and the block was put up for community discussion, with an immediate consensus supporting the block. The reason for the block is that I had drafted an article that discussed Jimmy Wales in a way that offended him, and included supporting media (which I solicited) hosted on Wikimedia Commons.

The media was removed from English Wikipedia (but not Commons). I am not seeking to reopen the discussion about whether that content should be restored to Wikipedia, and since the block I have not pursued the issue in a disruptive manner. Rather, I have made valuable posts to my talk page, highlighting places in which unrelated Wikipedia content is out of compliance with our copyright policies.
I have consistently made high quality contributions to both Wikipedia and Commons, and whilst it is true that I have been involved in some controversies, the depth of my commitment to the vision of our projects is amply demonstrated by the majority of my contributions. This block should be lifted so I can continue to engage as a good faith member of our community. Thank you for your consideration. Russavia (talk) 16:07, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

BTW that unblock request was "declined" by an impersonator of Wil
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit ... ck_request

This user has repeatedly violated the bounds of decency and propriety. His trolling with the Pricasso painting was well beyond the pale. He should stay blocked until the heat death of the universe. DO not unblock without speaking directly with the Executive Director. Regards, Wil

snowskarlet · Unread post by **snowskarlet** » Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:09 pm

neved wrote: BTW that unblock request was "declined" by an impersonator of Wil
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit ... ck_request
This user has repeatedly violated the bounds of decency and propriety. His trolling with the Pricasso painting was well beyond the pale. He should stay blocked until the heat death of the universe. DO not unblock without speaking directly with the Executive Director. Regards, Wil

Wil Sinclair(WMF) (T-C-L)

...and this impersonation account was promptly blocked by GorillaWarfare (T-C-L)!

I find this astounding on the face of it. What in the world could Wil have been thinking of? This seems to demonstate a majestic lack of judgment on his part...

Vigilant · Unread post by **Vigilant** » Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:14 pm

snowskarlet wrote:
neved wrote: BTW that unblock request was "declined" by an impersonator of Wil
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit ... ck_request
This user has repeatedly violated the bounds of decency and propriety. His trolling with the Pricasso painting was well beyond the pale. He should stay blocked until the heat death of the universe. DO not unblock without speaking directly with the Executive Director. Regards, Wil
Wil Sinclair(WMF) (T-C-L)

...and this impersonation account was promptly blocked by GorillaWarfare (T-C-L)!

I find this astounding on the face of it. What in the world could Wil have been thinking of? This seems to demonstate a majestic lack of judgment on his part...

Well, they asked hi to get involved.
I guess they should have been more specific on how to get involved.

Unread post by **Zoloft** » Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:35 pm

Vigilant wrote:
snowskarlet wrote:
neved wrote: BTW that unblock request was "declined" by an impersonator of Wil
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit ... ck_request
This user has repeatedly violated the bounds of decency and propriety. His trolling with the Pricasso painting was well beyond the pale. He should stay blocked until the heat death of the universe. DO not unblock without speaking directly with the Executive Director. Regards, Wil
Wil Sinclair(WMF) (T-C-L)

...and this impersonation account was promptly blocked by GorillaWarfare (T-C-L)!

I find this astounding on the face of it. What in the world could Wil have been thinking of? This seems to demonstate a majestic lack of judgment on his part...
Well, they asked hi to get involved.
I guess they should have been more specific on how to get involved.

The way I read it, Wil is not impersonating a WMF employee, some troll is impersonating Wil.

snowskarlet · Unread post by **snowskarlet** » Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:49 pm

Zoloft wrote: The way I read it, Wil is not impersonating a WMF employee, some troll is impersonating Wil.

Ah, I believe you. Much relieved.

neved · Unread post by **neved** » Tue Jun 10, 2014 5:14 am

Of course it was somebody impersonating Wil.
Real Wil is happily editing (building a better encyclopedia)

Everyone, I don't have time to keep coming back here to "vote" on one informal RfC after another. I'm trying to build a better encyclopedia. My goal for this month was to hit the "very active contributors" threshold by doing 100 edits on the encyclopedia itself. Now, I'm just trying to keep up with these silly off-topic debates on this talk page. Could we please just settle this? Formal RfC, ArbCom, whatev's. I don't care. I just want to spend more of my time building a better encyclopedia than dealing with silly wikipolitics. I'll be perfectly frank here: I have better things to do both on-wiki and IRL. Should I now create an informal RfC to see if everyone agrees with me? Thanks. ,Wil (talk) 03:30, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

I was thinking about that "build a better encyclopedia"... Could something good be built from something that is as unfair as wikipedia is?
Once again I'm using a comparison with the Soviet Union. I am sure many first communists genuinely tried to build a better world.
They did not see, or rather did not want to see Stalin's concentration camps, secreter tribunals, forced collectivization, secrecy, lying, dishonesty and corruption of their leaders, lack of freedoms, abuse of human rights and so on, and so on.
They were busy, building a better world.
Of course the severity and the numbers of atrocities on wikipedia cannot be compared to atrocities of the Soviet Union,
but wikipedia with its two dozen bullies who call themselves "the community" also has great potentials to ruin lives of the editors and the subjects of BLP.
I believe that no encyclopedia can be built in such environment as wikipedia has.

Off2riorob · Unread post by **Off2riorob** » Wed Jun 11, 2014 5:02 am

Seems his unblock request has failed

(permanent link)

seems a shame really from a lutz point of view it would have been totally amusing to watch the dramah ensue after his return

As I have seen users get a cool username and get away with all sorts - support as per User:Nannobear https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nanobear - User:Nyttend https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nyttend

Vigilant · Unread post by **Vigilant** » Wed Jun 11, 2014 4:41 pm

Off2riorob wrote:Seems his unblock request has failed

(permanent link)

seems a shame really from a lutz point of view it would have been totally amusing to watch the dramah ensue after his return

As I have seen users get a cool username and get away with all sorts - support as per User:Nannobear https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nanobear - User:Nyttend https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nyttend

There, there Scott.
Perhaps in another year, you and Ashley can make another run at that windmill.

I forgot that Ashley already won that particular contest.
It must make you burn while you pee to know that you are vastly less useful to en.wp that Ashley van Haeften.

neved · Unread post by **neved** » Wed Jun 11, 2014 11:39 pm

It will be a pity if russavia is not allowed back. He mastered to be a great trolling clown, and lately I am reading wikipedia mostly for a good laugh, the only thing it is good at.

Who else but russavia could have came up with this suggestion for DYK hook http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk: ... _the_Roads

We should then have the hook,...DYK...Vladimir Zhirinovsky put a ring on his big cock, and then placed it between Ms XXX's tits? Let's see how you guys would handle that one eh. Lighten up.....geeeez. Russavia ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) 22:21, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

and who else but russavia could have said this at Jimbo's talk

When I masturbate in public, I don't really feel any different than when I do it in private; can you possibly tell us why when you masturbate in public, it hurts? Y u no be Russavia ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) 19:42, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Of course russavia is also a dirty, dishonest bully, but I believe there's much more harm by allowing him to keep his administrative tools on commons than allowing him to English Wikipedia. I mean one bully more one less who cares.

Poetlister · Unread post by **Poetlister** » Thu Jun 12, 2014 10:14 am

How about allowing him to edit Jimbo's talk pages and the usual drama/troll places and nowhere else?

Unread post by **tarantino** » Sat Jun 14, 2014 7:41 pm

Russavia is already back, editing articles without logging in.

That's the same IP address he used on the wmuk website.

Unread post by **tarantino** » Sat Jun 14, 2014 8:45 pm

See also his new sockpuppet This cowboy's running from himself.

Like Kumioko and many others before him, Russavia has decided to simply ignore his indefinite block. Newyorkbrad (T-C-L), you should probably start preparing a legal threat. AGK (T-C-L), I think Russavia is self-employed, so to contact his employer you can use wikipedia's "email this user" function. It probably won't accomplish much, though.

JohnJ · Unread post by **JohnJ** » Sat Jun 14, 2014 9:06 pm

tarantino wrote:See also his new sockpuppet This cowboy's running from himself.

Like Kumioko and many others before him, Russavia has decided to simply ignore his indefinite block. Newyorkbrad (T-C-L), you should probably start preparing a legal threat. AGK (T-C-L), I think Russavia is self-employed, so to contact his employer you can use wikipedia's "email this user" function. It probably won't accomplish much, though.

It won't accomplish anything at all.

Wikipedia is written by people like you -- I am people like me.

You forgot this sock that I started to use whilst the unblock discussion was going on. The pumped up little squirts were discussing whether they should set a 6 or 12 month period before I can request an unblock again, so the only thing left to say is......

Then there is this beauty from the AN/I:

"Oppose. The quotes presented by Smallbones clinch the matter for me. Russavia continues to harbor a poisonous grudge which is a toxin we do not need at Wikipedia. Binksternet (talk) 03:48, 10 June 2014 (UTC)"

Then we have this:

Unread post by **Zoloft** » Sat Jun 14, 2014 9:11 pm

Or more accurately, welcome back.

Kumioko · Unread post by **Kumioko** » Sat Jun 14, 2014 10:46 pm

Yeah indefinite blocks only affect the law abiding citizen so to speak. Nothing really prevents people from dodging it and certainly a large number of banned editors imply waited a few months and came back, some likely went on to become admins.

The fact is the structure and purpose of Wikipedia really prevent blocks being effective. You either let people edit or you don't, there really is no middle ground regardless of how hard they might try. In my case, i know I will never be allowed back and I more or less accept that. It doesn't mean I will stop editing and it doesn't mean they can do anything about it. My ban will never be effective because I choose for it not to be. If they block one account I'll simply create another 10. All they need to stop me is unblock me and that will be it since my ban was nothing more than abuse from bullies. They wont though because that sets the precedent that they concede. So I will continue for the next several years, they will continue to catch the ones I want them to catch and it will waste a lot of peoples time. Hopefully they figure that out at some point, probably not.

I said all that to say this, its the same with Russavia and a lot of others. Its nothing to do with their editing, its political. Russavia and myself share the commonality that we are politically and socially outcasts on Wikipedia. Both for different reasons but its not likely to change. So they block us because we disagree and that in turn causes us to turn into vandals, trolls, sockmasters and disruptions. The cycle is largely caused by the Wikipedia community and their abusive nature.

Unread post by **tarantino** » Sat Jun 14, 2014 11:06 pm

Zoloft wrote::welcome:
Or more accurately, welcome back.

neved · Unread post by **neved** » Sat Jun 14, 2014 11:09 pm

tarantino wrote:
Zoloft wrote:
Or more accurately, welcome back.

Please forgive my ignorance but who are we looking at at this picture?

eagle · Unread post by **eagle** » Sat Jun 14, 2014 11:18 pm

neved wrote:
tarantino wrote:
Zoloft wrote:
Or more accurately, welcome back.

Please forgive my ignorance but who are we looking at at this picture?

Obviously, the WikiConference USA panel discussion on paid editing.

Kumioko · Unread post by **Kumioko** » Sat Jun 14, 2014 11:20 pm

Sadly I am old enough I not only know what this show is but I have watched and I can name at least 3 of them. Back when John Travolta had real eyebrows that is.:-)

Unread post by **Zoloft** » Sun Jun 15, 2014 1:11 am

Welcome_Back, Kotter (T-H-L) We'll leave all the banning and possible-reactivation stuff for later.

Unread post by **tarantino** » Sun Jun 15, 2014 1:29 am

neved wrote:
tarantino wrote:
Zoloft wrote:
Or more accurately, welcome back.

Please forgive my ignorance but who are we looking at at this picture?

John Travolta is second from the right. Two of the other actors pictured died in 2012 from a heart attack.

Malik Shabazz · Unread post by **Malik Shabazz** » Sun Jun 15, 2014 2:21 am

Technically, they died of separate heart attacks.

Sparky · Unread post by **Sparky** » Sun Jun 15, 2014 2:43 am

Malik Shabazz wrote:Technically, they died of separate heart attacks.

Fortunately, I was able to shield my keyboard from the spray of liquid after reading this post.

Sweet Revenge · Unread post by **Sweet Revenge** » Sun Jun 15, 2014 2:49 am

Malik Shabazz wrote:Technically, they died of separate heart attacks.

At least 5% of your posts are funnier than hell.

Unread post by **tarantino** » Sun Jun 15, 2014 3:13 am

Malik Shabazz wrote:Technically, they died of separate heart attacks. :D

neved · Unread post by **neved** » Sun Jun 15, 2014 4:00 am

tarantino wrote:See also his new sockpuppet This cowboy's running from himself.

Like Kumioko and many others before him, Russavia has decided to simply ignore his indefinite block. Newyorkbrad (T-C-L), you should probably start preparing a legal threat. AGK (T-C-L), I think Russavia is self-employed, so to contact his employer you can use wikipedia's "email this user" function. It probably won't accomplish much, though.

This cowboy's running from himself (T-C-L) does not even bother to hide his true identity, editing in russavia user space.
Maybe govcom secretly allowed russavia to come back under a different user name?

Unread post by **Zoloft** » Sun Jun 15, 2014 4:11 am

neved wrote:
tarantino wrote:See also his new sockpuppet This cowboy's running from himself.

Like Kumioko and many others before him, Russavia has decided to simply ignore his indefinite block. Newyorkbrad (T-C-L), you should probably start preparing a legal threat. AGK (T-C-L), I think Russavia is self-employed, so to contact his employer you can use wikipedia's "email this user" function. It probably won't accomplish much, though.
This cowboy's running from himself (T-C-L) does not even bother to hide his true identity, editing in russavia user space.
Maybe govcom secretly allowed russavia to come back under a different user name?

That's an interesting theory, but I'm gonna say... no.

If they approved of Russavia doing that, what possible negative motivator could they use on everybody else?

They are far too wimpy to do anything more forceful than 'ban' or block.'

Maybe a little character assassination on the side...

Notvelty · Unread post by **Notvelty** » Sun Jun 15, 2014 8:14 am

tarantino wrote:See also his new sockpuppet This cowboy's running from himself.

Like Kumioko and many others before him, Russavia has decided to simply ignore his indefinite block. Newyorkbrad (T-C-L), you should probably start preparing a legal threat. AGK (T-C-L), I think Russavia is self-employed, so to contact his employer you can use wikipedia's "email this user" function. It probably won't accomplish much, though.

If by"self-employed" you mean "living with Mummy", sure.

Notvelty · Unread post by **Notvelty** » Sun Jun 15, 2014 8:26 am

JohnJ wrote:
tarantino wrote:See also his new sockpuppet This cowboy's running from himself.

Like Kumioko and many others before him, Russavia has decided to simply ignore his indefinite block. Newyorkbrad (T-C-L), you should probably start preparing a legal threat. AGK (T-C-L), I think Russavia is self-employed, so to contact his employer you can use wikipedia's "email this user" function. It probably won't accomplish much, though.
It won't accomplish anything at all.

Wikipedia is written by people like you -- I am people like me.

You forgot this sock that I started to use whilst the unblock discussion was going on. The pumped up little squirts were discussing whether they should set a 6 or 12 month period before I can request an unblock again, so the only thing left to say is......

Then there is this beauty from the AN/I:

"Oppose. The quotes presented by Smallbones clinch the matter for me. Russavia continues to harbor a poisonous grudge which is a toxin we do not need at Wikipedia. Binksternet (talk) 03:48, 10 June 2014 (UTC)"

Then we have this:

I must wonder where "JohnJ" came from. If he is Scott Bibby, then I can think of no better way to prove the standard wikipedian line. If not, I apologise profusely.

Kumioko · Unread post by **Kumioko** » Sun Jun 15, 2014 3:36 pm

Anything Binksternet says I pretty much think the opposite so if he says that Russavia shouldn't come back that's proof enough for me to have him unblocked immediately. Binky is one of the most poisonous personalities on Wikipedia and it defies logic how he hasn't been banned. But then again, he runs a lot of new editors off the site and generally acts like a jerk in discussions which seems to be acceptable behavior these days.

Michaeldsuarez · Unread post by **Michaeldsuarez** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:22 am

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems&diff=126758776&oldid=126752931

Someone has to do something, although I doubt anything will happen. Russavia has too many friends, some innocent but too trusting.

Vigilant · Unread post by **Vigilant** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:24 am

Stirring the plot for a community ban.
Permalink

Any bets on how long it takes to get he desysoped on commons and globally locked?

Michaeldsuarez · Unread post by **Michaeldsuarez** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:50 am

Michaeldsuarez wrote:https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems&diff=126758776&oldid=126752931

Someone has to do something, although I doubt anything will happen. Russavia has too many friends, some innocent but too trusting.

**sigh** It's hopeless (permalink). Commons is easy pickings for corrupt, deceitful individuals such as Russavia. Russavia lies to them, and they still love and protect him.

Vigilant · Unread post by **Vigilant** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 4:43 am

Michaeldsuarez wrote:
Michaeldsuarez wrote:https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems&diff=126758776&oldid=126752931

Someone has to do something, although I doubt anything will happen. Russavia has too many friends, some innocent but too trusting.
**sigh** It's hopeless (permalink). Commons is easy pickings for corrupt, deceitful individuals such as Russavia. Russavia lies to them, and they still love and protect him.

Until the WMF steps on the commons admins ... hard ... this kind of nonsense will continue.

Cla68 · Unread post by **Cla68** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 7:20 am

Just had his talk page access revoked.

SB_Johnny · Unread post by **SB_Johnny** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:54 pm

And now "Blackmane" is comparing him to Mbz. That's just insulting.

Alison · Unread post by **Alison** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 7:43 pm

Socks err'where ...

Vigilant · Unread post by **Vigilant** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:53 pm

Alison wrote:Socks err'where ...

When does persistent sock puppeteer lead to global lock/ban?

Alison · Unread post by **Alison** » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:16 pm

Vigilant wrote:
Alison wrote:Socks err'where ...
When does persistent sock puppeteer lead to global lock/ban?

Who knows? I guess we're about to find out though, as he's stepping up his socking game and beginning to annoy his supporters.

And - somewhat hilariously - he's starting to troll by sending me personalized messages in the useragent data

That's pretty creative, tho' he's not the first to do that.

Coat of Many Colours · Unread post by **Coat of Many Colours** » Fri Jun 20, 2014 12:11 am

If Russavia had commissioned a decent artist, or even a reasonably competent indecent one, to provide a caricature of Jimbo Wales, he might have got a vote from me. But he didn't, and frankly what he did was witless and pretty goddamned offensive. To add insult to injury it is unfortunately way up there in J's beloved Google rankings.

Can't make Russavia out, essentially an exhibitionist (well yes) I guess. I do know I truly don't care.

EricBarbour · Unread post by **EricBarbour** » Fri Jun 20, 2014 1:00 am

Alison wrote:And - somewhat hilariously - he's starting to troll by sending me personalized messages in the useragent data That's pretty creative, tho' he's not the first to do that.

In other words, he is starting to copy Grawp.....

Unread post by **HRIP7** » Fri Jun 20, 2014 9:11 am

Coat of Many Colours wrote:If Russavia had commissioned a decent artist, or even a reasonably competent indecent one, to provide a caricature of Jimbo Wales, he might have got a vote from me. But he didn't, and frankly what he did was witless and pretty goddamned offensive. To add insult to injury it is unfortunately way up there in J's beloved Google rankings.

I thought – despite myself – that it was pretty funny. As was the Wikimedia Foundation board's resulting "Pricasso amendment", invoked for Jimbo only.

Russavia also did some solid work on the Belfer Center matter.

dogbiscuit · Unread post by **dogbiscuit** » Fri Jun 20, 2014 9:29 am

HRIP7 wrote: Russavia also did some solid work on the Belfer Center matter.

It is useful to highlight that. Russavia has an image with me of being a basement dwelling troll of little intellect (sorry, Russ!) but that work is of good quality, well investigated and well written with sound arguments being presented.

It begs the question why it is that Wikipedia and its siblings manage to create an environment where the worst sides of people are brought out rather than the best. What a waste!

I shall try and remodel my mental image to Russavia, the clever troll.

dadod · Unread post by **dadod** » Fri Jun 20, 2014 11:06 am

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... une_2014_2

@ "Fuck Off, CheckUser Browser/1.0 (It's Me; ru)" useragent, with the Russian localization tag.

Notvelty · Unread post by **Notvelty** » Fri Jun 20, 2014 2:06 pm

Coat of Many Colours wrote:
Can't make Russavia out,

Here, I'll help you. Whenever he opens his mouth or types something, just substitute

"me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me"

Vigilant · Unread post by **Vigilant** » Fri Jun 20, 2014 2:10 pm

Notvelty wrote:
Coat of Many Colours wrote:
Can't make Russavia out,
Here, I'll help you. Whenever he opens his mouth or types something, just substitute

"me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me"

You forgot the, "and fuck you..." at the end.

Coat of Many Colours · Unread post by **Coat of Many Colours** » Fri Jun 20, 2014 2:23 pm

HRIP7 wrote:
Coat of Many Colours wrote:If Russavia had commissioned a decent artist, or even a reasonably competent indecent one, to provide a caricature of Jimbo Wales, he might have got a vote from me. But he didn't, and frankly what he did was witless and pretty goddamned offensive. To add insult to injury it is unfortunately way up there in J's beloved Google rankings.
I thought – despite myself – that it was pretty funny. As was the Wikimedia Foundation board's resulting "Pricasso amendment", invoked for Jimbo only.

Russavia also did some solid work on the Belfer Center matter.

Perhaps I shouldn't be so censorious about something I don't the know the history of, but when I actually looked at the video I was pretty gobsmacked. And Pricasso as an artist really sucks.

There's something about Russavia my instinct tells me not to feed. Was amused though by the Wikipedia response you linked. Thanks for that.

Coat of Many Colours · Unread post by **Coat of Many Colours** » Fri Jun 20, 2014 2:25 pm

Notvelty wrote:
Coat of Many Colours wrote:
Can't make Russavia out,
Here, I'll help you. Whenever he opens his mouth or types something, just substitute

"me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me"

Indeed. My impression too.

neved · Unread post by **neved** » Fri Jun 20, 2014 3:49 pm

I have an open question for russavia that has been bothering me for quite some time. Russavia, you may respond it on my or your own meta talk.
So here's my question:

Russavia, you said:

A jury of my own peers? What an interesting trial that was then, when the accused was prevented from defending themselves, and when they attempted to, they were basically told "No, you can't do that", and were then duly escorted out of the courtroom, and locked out, whilst the trial continued. Stalin would be proud!en:User:Newyorkbrad is apparently a lawyer, so go ask him if what he participated in was a kangaroo court or not, and whether he thinks I had a fair ability to defend myself, not only accusations made by several people in that community, but also against accusations he himself made. russavia (talk) 05:36, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Russavia, I cannot agree with you more, but I'd like to ask you please why, if you understand so well what is a show trial, what is a kangaroo court, why, russavia, you supported my ban, when I was not able to defend myself even at my own talk page?

Alison · Unread post by **Alison** » Fri Jun 20, 2014 7:52 pm

dadod wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... une_2014_2

@ "Fuck Off, CheckUser Browser/1.0 (It's Me; ru)" useragent, with the Russian localization tag.

The subsequent one was even better. Gotta give the guy bonus points for creative trolling

Code: Select all

Hi Ally Cat You Look So Purrrrrrrrrty http://i.imgur.com/HxrXK7y.jpg