Brad, doing his best to spell things out for the lessers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit ... =556647529
'''Keep'''. First of all, I question the value of renominating this or any article for deletion just four days after a prior AFD closed as Keep, in the absence of a supervening BLP issue or the like. In any event, Wikipediocracy has become sufficiently notable to warrant an article here based on some of the sources that have been cited. At this point, the site is at least as notable as its now-moribund predecessor Wikipedia Review, which has enjoyed (?) an article for several years. And although we don't rely on future events as the basis for notability, the notability of Wikipediocracy is almost sure to continue to increase: Wikipedia and Wikimedia, for all of their positive attributes that keep us contributing, will continue to have faults and foibles that Wikipediocracy will seek to expose and publicize, sometimes fairly and sometimes otherwise.
I was fine up until here, but Brad just HAS to be thinking ahead.
If we delete this now, we'll be having an agonizing debate again about whether enough has changed to warrant inclusion some three or six months from now; let's not do that to ourselves.
I was really looking forward to doing this like the Republicans do the spending cap. Every 2 weeks whether it needs doing or not.
And I would have gotten away with it if it weren't for these meddling lawyers.
For what it's worth, I do not believe this article should be mainpaged—in general, including articles that the general public would perceive as navel-gazing on the main page should be avoided—but that is a different question from whether the article should exist at all.
Your side is going to lose that one too.
What Brad must feel like these days, from Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid
Percy Garris: Morons. I've got morons on my team. Nobody is going to rob us going down the mountain. We have got no money going down the mountain.
Finally, I hope that the community will devote only a reasonably proportionate amount of time to this entire discussion, recognizing that while this AFD may matter very much to our "inside baseball" crowd, the short-term fate of this article is of limited importance in the grander scheme of wikithings.
Dontcha know there's an encyclopedia to build?!
In the fast few days, a lot of Wikipedians (myself included) have looked back at the damage done by Qworty and asked "why wasn't this problem identified much sooner?" Part of the answer is that sometimes we collectively focus too much of the community's most precious resource, which is our contributors' time and attention, not on improving our articles and making sure that we treat our fellow editors and our article subjects fairly, but on digressions like this one. [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 22:20, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
The larger part of the issue is that your admin corps, as a whole, is utterly corrupt and thoroughly incompetent.
You had a CU result showing socking and bad faith editing and they let it sit for YEARS.
But Ann_Coulter's 
Our Demiurge1000 does make 
