Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 2277
- kołdry
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 3:27 am
Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
ArbCom had banned Rich Farmbrough from using automation, but he's doing it anyway per "ignore all rules." Sandstein is not amused and is proposing a 1-year time out.
Perennial timewaster Kumioko says if the ban passes, he "will be forced to reopen a case appealing it wasting even more of everyones time."
-
- Nice Scum
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 3:51 pm
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
I hope he does slap a 1-year on him, if only to provoke Kumioko to open an arbcom case, I have at least an A4 of evidence of Kumis trolling that can just be cut and pasted. His incessant whining about how he cant do this, cant do that etc. He just cant get over that he isnt an admin, and never will be.
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1920
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 12:19 am
- Wikipedia User: The Devil's Advocate
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
"For those who stubbornly seek freedom around the world, there can be no more urgent task than to come to understand the mechanisms and practices of indoctrination."
- Noam Chomsky
-
- Genius
- Posts: 25599
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
- Nom de plume: Poetlister
- Location: London, living in a similar way
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
Yes, it's now the second longest article on the whole site. It's also completely pointless; all that is necessary is a link to the data source. (The longest article, List of jōyō kanji (T-H-L), isn't much use either.)The Devil's Advocate wrote:Jesus, Rich took that article from 8 kilobytes to 360 in a single edit! He then went in and bumped it all the way up to 400 kilobytes! This is how it looked before and this is how it looks now. All of that, in a single hour. Clearly Rich is a sign of the darkest aspects to the rise of the Wikidroids.
-
- Posts: 10891
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:32 pm
- Location: hell
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
Not necessarily, it's just difficult if you're trying to learn Japanese. Still one of the world's toughest languages, especially the written form.Outsider wrote: (The longest article, List of jōyō kanji (T-H-L), isn't much use either.)
Gosh, Batman, I haven't said anything insulting about Sandstein lately. Perhaps he's behaving himself, unlikely as that sounds.
-
- Denizen
- Posts: 6953
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:05 am
- Wikipedia User: Jayen466
- Wikipedia Review Member: HRIP7
- Actual Name: Andreas Kolbe
- Location: UK
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 3:27 am
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1383
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 3:16 am
- Wikipedia User: Volunteer Marek
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
I've said this before but Sandstein's rep is to a significant degree undeserved. It's the cold unemotional robot style ("you violated rule x. The table at the back of my manual says that requires a block of length y. Enacted.") that makes people think he's a hard ass. In terms of actual ban hammering, rather than talk, he's softer than many others, especially at AE.Mason wrote:Just two months? We may be seeing a kinder, gentler Sandstein.
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 3:27 am
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
He had filed an AN/I complaint about an admin which boomeranged into a site ban when it was noticed he had asked the admin "Are you a Muslim Pakistani?" during the argument.
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1920
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 12:19 am
- Wikipedia User: The Devil's Advocate
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
YRC was actually involved in a noticeboard discussion about whether the Derby sex gang was being used as a "cause for hate-mongering" against Pakistani Muslims by alleging a pattern of child sex-grooming by certain members of that community, and YRC said that this was definitely a pattern and was mentioned in reliable sources so it wasn't just a cause for hate-mongering. Maunus, the admin, attacked him out of the blue about his "ethics" and "double standrds" and YRC basically asked him if he was a Pakistani Muslim and was thus offended because he was close to the subject. Maunus starts exploding at him and then the matter dies, until two days later when YRC closes an ANI discussion about the Derby sex gang and Maunus uncloses it before repeatedly attacking YRC again. YRC reports him for numerous acts of incivility and just generally being a douchenozzle so Maunus pulls the old tu quoque defense with the civility parole kicker by citing the two-day-old comment and then sacrifices his admin bit in exchange for the satisfaction of eliminating a long-standing opponent.Mason wrote:Speaking of newly banned editors, YouReallyCan (aka Off2RioRob) just got the axe.
He had filed an AN/I complaint about an admin which boomeranged into a site ban when it was noticed he had asked the admin "Are you a Muslim Pakistani?" during the argument.
It was met with lots of "he agreed to this restriction" supports, which kind of ignored that during the RfC Prioryman basically pointed a gun called ArbCom at YRC and told him to accept his demands. All in all, a normal day on Wikipedia.
"For those who stubbornly seek freedom around the world, there can be no more urgent task than to come to understand the mechanisms and practices of indoctrination."
- Noam Chomsky
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 4446
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 6:18 pm
- Wikipedia User: Nastytroll
- Wikipedia Review Member: Lilburne
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
YRC was dead following the RFC. YRC was never a real player, never had the killer instinct. At any point in time the nasty little shits on that site were bound to get him.The Devil's Advocate wrote: It was met with lots of "he agreed to this restriction" supports, which kind of ignored that during the RfC Prioryman basically pointed a gun called ArbCom at YRC and told him to accept his demands. All in all, a normal day on Wikipedia.
So Google's shills can shriek there whenever they're inclined
-
- Retired
- Posts: 4130
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:40 pm
- Wikipedia User: Scott
- Location: London
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
Cross link to related discussion here.The Devil's Advocate wrote:the Derby sex gang
Yes, but in the end it wouldn't be an encyclopedia. It would be a wiki. -- WardCunningham (Jan 2001)
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 4:44 am
- Location: Shenanigan City
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
At least Sandstein isn't the cabal type. I'm rather fond of him myself for a personal reason. I made a throwaway nasty remark about someone (though backed by diffs) on an Aricles for Deletion page which was predictably answered by some do-gooder rebuking me for personal attacks or something, and I figured that was that. Sandstein saw it, must have looked at my diffs, and simply indeffed the miscreant without request, fanfare, or discussion.Volunteer Marek wrote:I've said this before but Sandstein's rep is to a significant degree undeserved. It's the cold unemotional robot style ("you violated rule x. The table at the back of my manual says that requires a block of length y. Enacted.") that makes people think he's a hard ass. In terms of actual ban hammering, rather than talk, he's softer than many others, especially at AE.Mason wrote:Just two months? We may be seeing a kinder, gentler Sandstein.
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1569
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 1:31 am
- Wikipedia User: Tarc
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk: ... an_enactedMason wrote:Speaking of newly banned editors, YouReallyCan (aka Off2RioRob) just got the axe.
He had filed an AN/I complaint about an admin which boomeranged into a site ban when it was noticed he had asked the admin "Are you a Muslim Pakistani?" during the argument.
I pointed out that YRC was blocked because he didn't play the MMORPG in the right way, and got jumped on by several of the True Believers(tm).
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 2592
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:51 am
- Wikipedia User: TungstenCarbide
- Wikipedia Review Member: TungstenCarbide
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
Jesus what a bunch of sniveling whiners.Tarc wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk: ... an_enactedMason wrote:Speaking of newly banned editors, YouReallyCan (aka Off2RioRob) just got the axe.
He had filed an AN/I complaint about an admin which boomeranged into a site ban when it was noticed he had asked the admin "Are you a Muslim Pakistani?" during the argument.
I pointed out that YRC was blocked because he didn't play the MMORPG in the right way, and got jumped on by several of the True Believers(tm).
-
- Posts: 10891
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:32 pm
- Location: hell
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
Eh, just another day on the Looneytoon Ranch. Point and laugh, that's all you can do.TungstenCarbide wrote:Jesus what a bunch of sniveling whiners.Tarc wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk: ... an_enacted
I pointed out that YRC was blocked because he didn't play the MMORPG in the right way, and got jumped on by several of the True Believers(tm).
Bear this in mind: five years ago, AN/I got so much traffic, it was being archived every day or two. Now it takes several days. The arguments are getting longer and more aggressive, thus keeping threads open longer--but there's less traffic overall.
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 3:40 pm
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
Tarc, the IP editor is none other than Mbz1, evading her community ban and picking the axe up right where she left off [1] [2]. I would have thought you'd have got that from her often repeated mantra that you aren't a human.Tarc wrote:I pointed out that YRC was blocked because he didn't play the MMORPG in the right way, and got jumped on by several of the True Believers(tm).
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1569
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 1:31 am
- Wikipedia User: Tarc
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
I was aware of that, yea, especially given the edits to Jimbo's page about the Ukrainian stuff. And now she has outed herself for certain by referencing this post and by drawing attention to her beef with the dreaded "bully" Gwen Gale.plix tixiplik wrote:Tarc, the IP editor is none other than Mbz1, evading her community ban and picking the axe up right where she left off [1] [2]. I would have thought you'd have got that from her often repeated mantra that you aren't a human.Tarc wrote:I pointed out that YRC was blocked because he didn't play the MMORPG in the right way, and got jumped on by several of the True Believers(tm).
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1383
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 3:16 am
- Wikipedia User: Volunteer Marek
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
Eh, YRC made an idiotic comment and Maunus responded in a way which idiotic comments deserve. He then self reverted within minutes and subsequently voluntarily resigned his adminship (if I'm reading this right). Not sure how you can fault Maunus here.The Devil's Advocate wrote:YRC was actually involved in a noticeboard discussion about whether the Derby sex gang was being used as a "cause for hate-mongering" against Pakistani Muslims by alleging a pattern of child sex-grooming by certain members of that community, and YRC said that this was definitely a pattern and was mentioned in reliable sources so it wasn't just a cause for hate-mongering. Maunus, the admin, attacked him out of the blue about his "ethics" and "double standrds" and YRC basically asked him if he was a Pakistani Muslim and was thus offended because he was close to the subject. Maunus starts exploding at him and then the matter dies, until two days later when YRC closes an ANI discussion about the Derby sex gang and Maunus uncloses it before repeatedly attacking YRC again. YRC reports him for numerous acts of incivility and just generally being a douchenozzle so Maunus pulls the old tu quoque defense with the civility parole kicker by citing the two-day-old comment and then sacrifices his admin bit in exchange for the satisfaction of eliminating a long-standing opponent.Mason wrote:Speaking of newly banned editors, YouReallyCan (aka Off2RioRob) just got the axe.
He had filed an AN/I complaint about an admin which boomeranged into a site ban when it was noticed he had asked the admin "Are you a Muslim Pakistani?" during the argument.
It was met with lots of "he agreed to this restriction" supports, which kind of ignored that during the RfC Prioryman basically pointed a gun called ArbCom at YRC and told him to accept his demands. All in all, a normal day on Wikipedia.
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1920
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 12:19 am
- Wikipedia User: The Devil's Advocate
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
Characters such as Maunus are all about creating these types of situations in order to "win" at Wikipedia. I fault Maunus, because Maunus is responsible for creating the situation and is also responsible for aggravating it further.Volunteer Marek wrote:Eh, YRC made an idiotic comment and Maunus responded in a way which idiotic comments deserve. He then self reverted within minutes and subsequently voluntarily resigned his adminship (if I'm reading this right). Not sure how you can fault Maunus here.
"For those who stubbornly seek freedom around the world, there can be no more urgent task than to come to understand the mechanisms and practices of indoctrination."
- Noam Chomsky
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 2:05 am
- Wikipedia Review Member: jd turk
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
Eh, YRC got the axe because he has delusions of grandeur. He's a big fan of the "content over civility" way of thought, but he has no content. The only thing he ever did was work at BLP, but his contributions there haven't amounted to that much lately and it's easy to go to ANI and make a case he's far more trouble than he's worth. He can't write a sentence, and he can't let anything go without being a part of a fight. He's better off doing something else with his time.Tarc wrote:I pointed out that YRC was blocked because he didn't play the MMORPG in the right way, and got jumped on by several of the True Believers(tm).
I didn't realize that either. Makes sense though. Man, what a cavalcade of crazy she was. And apparently still is.
-
- Critic
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 5:40 am
- Wikipedia User: Mathsci
- Wikipedia Review Member: Mathsci
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
Maunus is a talented anthropologist specialising in meso-America. He is an asset to wikipedia. There's no shortage of people to edit or monitor BLPs, so YRC's absence is not a great loss.The Devil's Advocate wrote:Characters such as Maunus are all about creating these types of situations in order to "win" at Wikipedia. I fault Maunus, because Maunus is responsible for creating the situation and is also responsible for aggravating it further.Volunteer Marek wrote:Eh, YRC made an idiotic comment and Maunus responded in a way which idiotic comments deserve. He then self reverted within minutes and subsequently voluntarily resigned his adminship (if I'm reading this right). Not sure how you can fault Maunus here.
-
- Denizen
- Posts: 6953
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:05 am
- Wikipedia User: Jayen466
- Wikipedia Review Member: HRIP7
- Actual Name: Andreas Kolbe
- Location: UK
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
The first two statements I believe are quite correct. I disagree with the other two.Mathsci wrote:Maunus is a talented anthropologist specialising in meso-America. He is an asset to wikipedia. There's no shortage of people to edit or monitor BLPs, so YRC's absence is not a great loss.The Devil's Advocate wrote:Characters such as Maunus are all about creating these types of situations in order to "win" at Wikipedia. I fault Maunus, because Maunus is responsible for creating the situation and is also responsible for aggravating it further.Volunteer Marek wrote:Eh, YRC made an idiotic comment and Maunus responded in a way which idiotic comments deserve. He then self reverted within minutes and subsequently voluntarily resigned his adminship (if I'm reading this right). Not sure how you can fault Maunus here.
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1920
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 12:19 am
- Wikipedia User: The Devil's Advocate
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
There is actually a shortage of people, even when it comes to removing obvious vandalism. Never mind the more subtle POV-pushing on BLPs, which can be much more taxing and time-consuming to address. As for being an asset due to expertise in a specific field, that should not lead to magical immunity in all areas of the site or even in the area relevant to their credentials. Many credentialed editors try to use their real-life status as a get-out-of-jail-free card or a license to kill regardless of where they are acting badly. You have played your credentials many times in your disputes to try and get out of trouble, just like you play Echigo mole or the Deviant Art editors, and it doesn't even have relevance since your problems are nearly always outside your actual area of expertise.Mathsci wrote:Maunus is a talented anthropologist specialising in meso-America. He is an asset to wikipedia. There's no shortage of people to edit or monitor BLPs, so YRC's absence is not a great loss.
Being "a talented anthropologist specialising in meso-America" does not mean Maunus has a lock on every subject that concerns human beings. No amount of credentials eliminates the potential for bias. If anything, it aggravates existing biases as a credentialed expert will be more self-assured and is likely much better at rationalizing. His attacks on YRC were ignorant and showed a failure to grasp the context of the situation due to his own personal biases, both regarding the subject under discussion and regarding YRC himself. It was not about adding anything of value or doing anything constructive, but was instead all about getting at someone he doesn't like.
"For those who stubbornly seek freedom around the world, there can be no more urgent task than to come to understand the mechanisms and practices of indoctrination."
- Noam Chomsky
-
- Critic
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 5:40 am
- Wikipedia User: Mathsci
- Wikipedia Review Member: Mathsci
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
Maunus adds content in encyclopedic areas, is perceptive and has good powers of judgement. Unlike you.The Devil's Advocate wrote:There is actually a shortage of people, even when it comes to removing obvious vandalism. Never mind the more subtle POV-pushing on BLPs, which can be much more taxing and time-consuming to address. As for being an asset due to expertise in a specific field, that should not lead to magical immunity in all areas of the site or even in the area relevant to their credentials. Many credentialed editors try to use their real-life status as a get-out-of-jail-free card or a license to kill regardless of where they are acting badly. You have played your credentials many times in your disputes to try and get out of trouble, just like you play Echigo mole or the Deviant Art editors, and it doesn't even have relevance since your problems are nearly always outside your actual area of expertise.Mathsci wrote:Maunus is a talented anthropologist specialising in meso-America. He is an asset to wikipedia. There's no shortage of people to edit or monitor BLPs, so YRC's absence is not a great loss.
Being "a talented anthropologist specialising in meso-America" does not mean Maunus has a lock on every subject that concerns human beings. No amount of credentials eliminates the potential for bias. If anything, it aggravates existing biases as a credentialed expert will be more self-assured and is likely much better at rationalizing. His attacks on YRC were ignorant and showed a failure to grasp the context of the situation due to his own personal biases, both regarding the subject under discussion and regarding YRC himself. It was not about adding anything of value or doing anything constructive, but was instead all about getting at someone he doesn't like.
-
- Retired
- Posts: 4130
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:40 pm
- Wikipedia User: Scott
- Location: London
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
Mathsci wrote:Maunus adds content in encyclopedic areas, is perceptive and has good powers of judgement. Unlike you.
Yes, but in the end it wouldn't be an encyclopedia. It would be a wiki. -- WardCunningham (Jan 2001)
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:26 am
- Wikipedia User: SB_Johnny
- Wikipedia Review Member: SB_Johnny
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
Wrong smiley. This is the one you want:Hex wrote:Mathsci wrote:Maunus adds content in encyclopedic areas, is perceptive and has good powers of judgement. Unlike you.
-
- Retired
- Posts: 4130
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:40 pm
- Wikipedia User: Scott
- Location: London
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
True dat.SB_Johnny wrote:Wrong smiley. This is the one you want:Hex wrote:
Yes, but in the end it wouldn't be an encyclopedia. It would be a wiki. -- WardCunningham (Jan 2001)
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1920
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 12:19 am
- Wikipedia User: The Devil's Advocate
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
Mathsci wrote:Maunus adds content in encyclopedic areas, is perceptive and has good powers of judgement. Unlike you.
"For those who stubbornly seek freedom around the world, there can be no more urgent task than to come to understand the mechanisms and practices of indoctrination."
- Noam Chomsky
-
- Gregarious
- Posts: 886
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 12:08 am
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
-
- Critic
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 5:40 am
- Wikipedia User: Mathsci
- Wikipedia Review Member: Mathsci
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
Internet troll to the rescueCaptain Occam wrote:TDA, whenever you're planning to get more involved in race articles ....
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 2:05 am
- Wikipedia Review Member: jd turk
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
Ah, lovely. Can't wait to see how that twisted line of logic plays out.Mathsci wrote:Internet troll to the rescueCaptain Occam wrote:TDA, whenever you're planning to get more involved in race articles ....
-
- Critic
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 5:40 am
- Wikipedia User: Mathsci
- Wikipedia Review Member: Mathsci
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
Well the Texas furry has made their first edit ever to the talk page. Birds of a feather ...jd turk wrote:Ah, lovely. Can't wait to see how that twisted line of logic plays out.
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1569
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 1:31 am
- Wikipedia User: Tarc
Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned
Hm, good luck there. Seren didn't fare so well the last time he dipped a toe into a true Wikipedia hot-button topic area.Mathsci wrote:Well the Texas furry has made their first edit ever to the talk page. Birds of a feather ...jd turk wrote:Ah, lovely. Can't wait to see how that twisted line of logic plays out.
(fixed url, you're welcome)