Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

User avatar
Mason
Habitué
Posts: 2277
kołdry
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 3:27 am

Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by Mason » Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:05 pm

Not Justin/Koavf, but the other one.

ArbCom had banned Rich Farmbrough from using automation, but he's doing it anyway per "ignore all rules." Sandstein is not amused and is proposing a 1-year time out.

Perennial timewaster Kumioko says if the ban passes, he "will be forced to reopen a case appealing it wasting even more of everyones time."

Anroth
Nice Scum
Posts: 3065
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 3:51 pm

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by Anroth » Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:38 pm

I wouldnt say 'not amused'. That implies Sandstein has any feelings about it, this is about the most un-emotional block he has considered putting out. He is completely right though, it was quite clear that arbcom were considering a year long break the last time.

I hope he does slap a 1-year on him, if only to provoke Kumioko to open an arbcom case, I have at least an A4 of evidence of Kumis trolling that can just be cut and pasted. His incessant whining about how he cant do this, cant do that etc. He just cant get over that he isnt an admin, and never will be.

User avatar
The Devil's Advocate
Habitué
Posts: 1920
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 12:19 am
Wikipedia User: The Devil's Advocate

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by The Devil's Advocate » Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:05 pm

Jesus, Rich took that article from 8 kilobytes to 360 in a single edit! He then went in and bumped it all the way up to 400 kilobytes! This is how it looked before and this is how it looks now. All of that, in a single hour. Clearly Rich is a sign of the darkest aspects to the rise of the Wikidroids.

"For those who stubbornly seek freedom around the world, there can be no more urgent task than to come to understand the mechanisms and practices of indoctrination."

- Noam Chomsky


User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by Poetlister » Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:27 pm

The Devil's Advocate wrote:Jesus, Rich took that article from 8 kilobytes to 360 in a single edit! He then went in and bumped it all the way up to 400 kilobytes! This is how it looked before and this is how it looks now. All of that, in a single hour. Clearly Rich is a sign of the darkest aspects to the rise of the Wikidroids.
Yes, it's now the second longest article on the whole site. It's also completely pointless; all that is necessary is a link to the data source. (The longest article, List of jōyō kanji (T-H-L), isn't much use either.)
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

EricBarbour
 
Posts: 10891
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:32 pm
Location: hell

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by EricBarbour » Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:05 am

Outsider wrote: (The longest article, List of jōyō kanji (T-H-L), isn't much use either.)
Not necessarily, it's just difficult if you're trying to learn Japanese. Still one of the world's toughest languages, especially the written form.

Gosh, Batman, I haven't said anything insulting about Sandstein lately. Perhaps he's behaving himself, unlikely as that sounds.

User avatar
HRIP7
Denizen
Posts: 6953
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:05 am
Wikipedia User: Jayen466
Wikipedia Review Member: HRIP7
Actual Name: Andreas Kolbe
Location: UK

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by HRIP7 » Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:37 am

The result was a two-month block imposed by Sandstein.

User avatar
Mason
Habitué
Posts: 2277
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 3:27 am

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by Mason » Sun Jan 20, 2013 8:12 am

Just two months? We may be seeing a kinder, gentler Sandstein.

Volunteer Marek
Habitué
Posts: 1383
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 3:16 am
Wikipedia User: Volunteer Marek

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by Volunteer Marek » Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:58 am

Mason wrote:Just two months? We may be seeing a kinder, gentler Sandstein.
I've said this before but Sandstein's rep is to a significant degree undeserved. It's the cold unemotional robot style ("you violated rule x. The table at the back of my manual says that requires a block of length y. Enacted.") that makes people think he's a hard ass. In terms of actual ban hammering, rather than talk, he's softer than many others, especially at AE.

User avatar
Mason
Habitué
Posts: 2277
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 3:27 am

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by Mason » Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:35 pm

Speaking of newly banned editors, YouReallyCan (aka Off2RioRob) just got the axe.

He had filed an AN/I complaint about an admin which boomeranged into a site ban when it was noticed he had asked the admin "Are you a Muslim Pakistani?" during the argument.

User avatar
The Devil's Advocate
Habitué
Posts: 1920
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 12:19 am
Wikipedia User: The Devil's Advocate

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by The Devil's Advocate » Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:53 pm

Mason wrote:Speaking of newly banned editors, YouReallyCan (aka Off2RioRob) just got the axe.

He had filed an AN/I complaint about an admin which boomeranged into a site ban when it was noticed he had asked the admin "Are you a Muslim Pakistani?" during the argument.
YRC was actually involved in a noticeboard discussion about whether the Derby sex gang was being used as a "cause for hate-mongering" against Pakistani Muslims by alleging a pattern of child sex-grooming by certain members of that community, and YRC said that this was definitely a pattern and was mentioned in reliable sources so it wasn't just a cause for hate-mongering. Maunus, the admin, attacked him out of the blue about his "ethics" and "double standrds" and YRC basically asked him if he was a Pakistani Muslim and was thus offended because he was close to the subject. Maunus starts exploding at him and then the matter dies, until two days later when YRC closes an ANI discussion about the Derby sex gang and Maunus uncloses it before repeatedly attacking YRC again. YRC reports him for numerous acts of incivility and just generally being a douchenozzle so Maunus pulls the old tu quoque defense with the civility parole kicker by citing the two-day-old comment and then sacrifices his admin bit in exchange for the satisfaction of eliminating a long-standing opponent.

It was met with lots of "he agreed to this restriction" supports, which kind of ignored that during the RfC Prioryman basically pointed a gun called ArbCom at YRC and told him to accept his demands. All in all, a normal day on Wikipedia.

"For those who stubbornly seek freedom around the world, there can be no more urgent task than to come to understand the mechanisms and practices of indoctrination."

- Noam Chomsky


User avatar
lilburne
Habitué
Posts: 4446
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 6:18 pm
Wikipedia User: Nastytroll
Wikipedia Review Member: Lilburne

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by lilburne » Thu Jan 24, 2013 7:06 pm

The Devil's Advocate wrote: It was met with lots of "he agreed to this restriction" supports, which kind of ignored that during the RfC Prioryman basically pointed a gun called ArbCom at YRC and told him to accept his demands. All in all, a normal day on Wikipedia.
YRC was dead following the RFC. YRC was never a real player, never had the killer instinct. At any point in time the nasty little shits on that site were bound to get him.
They have been inserting little memes in everybody's mind
So Google's shills can shriek there whenever they're inclined

Hex
Retired
Posts: 4130
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:40 pm
Wikipedia User: Scott
Location: London

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by Hex » Thu Jan 24, 2013 7:34 pm

The Devil's Advocate wrote:the Derby sex gang
Cross link to related discussion here.
My question, to this esteemed Wiki community, is this: Do you think that a Wiki could successfully generate a useful encyclopedia? -- JimboWales
Yes, but in the end it wouldn't be an encyclopedia. It would be a wiki. -- WardCunningham (Jan 2001)

User avatar
isaan
Contributor
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 4:44 am
Location: Shenanigan City

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by isaan » Fri Jan 25, 2013 12:05 am

Volunteer Marek wrote:
Mason wrote:Just two months? We may be seeing a kinder, gentler Sandstein.
I've said this before but Sandstein's rep is to a significant degree undeserved. It's the cold unemotional robot style ("you violated rule x. The table at the back of my manual says that requires a block of length y. Enacted.") that makes people think he's a hard ass. In terms of actual ban hammering, rather than talk, he's softer than many others, especially at AE.
At least Sandstein isn't the cabal type. I'm rather fond of him myself for a personal reason. I made a throwaway nasty remark about someone (though backed by diffs) on an Aricles for Deletion page which was predictably answered by some do-gooder rebuking me for personal attacks or something, and I figured that was that. Sandstein saw it, must have looked at my diffs, and simply indeffed the miscreant without request, fanfare, or discussion.

User avatar
Tarc
Habitué
Posts: 1569
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 1:31 am
Wikipedia User: Tarc

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by Tarc » Fri Jan 25, 2013 12:24 am

Mason wrote:Speaking of newly banned editors, YouReallyCan (aka Off2RioRob) just got the axe.

He had filed an AN/I complaint about an admin which boomeranged into a site ban when it was noticed he had asked the admin "Are you a Muslim Pakistani?" during the argument.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk: ... an_enacted

I pointed out that YRC was blocked because he didn't play the MMORPG in the right way, and got jumped on by several of the True Believers(tm).
"The world needs bad men. We keep the other bad men from the door."

User avatar
TungstenCarbide
Habitué
Posts: 2592
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:51 am
Wikipedia User: TungstenCarbide
Wikipedia Review Member: TungstenCarbide

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by TungstenCarbide » Fri Jan 25, 2013 1:31 am

Tarc wrote:
Mason wrote:Speaking of newly banned editors, YouReallyCan (aka Off2RioRob) just got the axe.

He had filed an AN/I complaint about an admin which boomeranged into a site ban when it was noticed he had asked the admin "Are you a Muslim Pakistani?" during the argument.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk: ... an_enacted

I pointed out that YRC was blocked because he didn't play the MMORPG in the right way, and got jumped on by several of the True Believers(tm).
Jesus what a bunch of sniveling whiners.
Gone hiking. also, beware of women with crazy head gear and a dagger.

EricBarbour
 
Posts: 10891
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:32 pm
Location: hell

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by EricBarbour » Fri Jan 25, 2013 7:21 am

TungstenCarbide wrote:
Tarc wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk: ... an_enacted

I pointed out that YRC was blocked because he didn't play the MMORPG in the right way, and got jumped on by several of the True Believers(tm).
Jesus what a bunch of sniveling whiners.
Eh, just another day on the Looneytoon Ranch. Point and laugh, that's all you can do.

Bear this in mind: five years ago, AN/I got so much traffic, it was being archived every day or two. Now it takes several days. The arguments are getting longer and more aggressive, thus keeping threads open longer--but there's less traffic overall.

User avatar
plix tixiplik
Contributor
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 3:40 pm

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by plix tixiplik » Fri Jan 25, 2013 9:34 am

Tarc wrote:I pointed out that YRC was blocked because he didn't play the MMORPG in the right way, and got jumped on by several of the True Believers(tm).
Tarc, the IP editor is none other than Mbz1, evading her community ban and picking the axe up right where she left off [1] [2]. I would have thought you'd have got that from her often repeated mantra that you aren't a human.

User avatar
Tarc
Habitué
Posts: 1569
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 1:31 am
Wikipedia User: Tarc

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by Tarc » Fri Jan 25, 2013 4:07 pm

plix tixiplik wrote:
Tarc wrote:I pointed out that YRC was blocked because he didn't play the MMORPG in the right way, and got jumped on by several of the True Believers(tm).
Tarc, the IP editor is none other than Mbz1, evading her community ban and picking the axe up right where she left off [1] [2]. I would have thought you'd have got that from her often repeated mantra that you aren't a human.
I was aware of that, yea, especially given the edits to Jimbo's page about the Ukrainian stuff. And now she has outed herself for certain by referencing this post and by drawing attention to her beef with the dreaded "bully" Gwen Gale.
"The world needs bad men. We keep the other bad men from the door."

Volunteer Marek
Habitué
Posts: 1383
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 3:16 am
Wikipedia User: Volunteer Marek

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by Volunteer Marek » Fri Jan 25, 2013 4:41 pm

The Devil's Advocate wrote:
Mason wrote:Speaking of newly banned editors, YouReallyCan (aka Off2RioRob) just got the axe.

He had filed an AN/I complaint about an admin which boomeranged into a site ban when it was noticed he had asked the admin "Are you a Muslim Pakistani?" during the argument.
YRC was actually involved in a noticeboard discussion about whether the Derby sex gang was being used as a "cause for hate-mongering" against Pakistani Muslims by alleging a pattern of child sex-grooming by certain members of that community, and YRC said that this was definitely a pattern and was mentioned in reliable sources so it wasn't just a cause for hate-mongering. Maunus, the admin, attacked him out of the blue about his "ethics" and "double standrds" and YRC basically asked him if he was a Pakistani Muslim and was thus offended because he was close to the subject. Maunus starts exploding at him and then the matter dies, until two days later when YRC closes an ANI discussion about the Derby sex gang and Maunus uncloses it before repeatedly attacking YRC again. YRC reports him for numerous acts of incivility and just generally being a douchenozzle so Maunus pulls the old tu quoque defense with the civility parole kicker by citing the two-day-old comment and then sacrifices his admin bit in exchange for the satisfaction of eliminating a long-standing opponent.

It was met with lots of "he agreed to this restriction" supports, which kind of ignored that during the RfC Prioryman basically pointed a gun called ArbCom at YRC and told him to accept his demands. All in all, a normal day on Wikipedia.
Eh, YRC made an idiotic comment and Maunus responded in a way which idiotic comments deserve. He then self reverted within minutes and subsequently voluntarily resigned his adminship (if I'm reading this right). Not sure how you can fault Maunus here.

User avatar
The Devil's Advocate
Habitué
Posts: 1920
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 12:19 am
Wikipedia User: The Devil's Advocate

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by The Devil's Advocate » Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:21 am

Volunteer Marek wrote:Eh, YRC made an idiotic comment and Maunus responded in a way which idiotic comments deserve. He then self reverted within minutes and subsequently voluntarily resigned his adminship (if I'm reading this right). Not sure how you can fault Maunus here.
Characters such as Maunus are all about creating these types of situations in order to "win" at Wikipedia. I fault Maunus, because Maunus is responsible for creating the situation and is also responsible for aggravating it further.

"For those who stubbornly seek freedom around the world, there can be no more urgent task than to come to understand the mechanisms and practices of indoctrination."

- Noam Chomsky


jd turk
Contributor
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 2:05 am
Wikipedia Review Member: jd turk

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by jd turk » Sat Jan 26, 2013 2:04 am

Tarc wrote:I pointed out that YRC was blocked because he didn't play the MMORPG in the right way, and got jumped on by several of the True Believers(tm).
Eh, YRC got the axe because he has delusions of grandeur. He's a big fan of the "content over civility" way of thought, but he has no content. The only thing he ever did was work at BLP, but his contributions there haven't amounted to that much lately and it's easy to go to ANI and make a case he's far more trouble than he's worth. He can't write a sentence, and he can't let anything go without being a part of a fight. He's better off doing something else with his time.
plix tixiplik wrote:Tarc, the IP editor is none other than Mbz1, evading her community ban and picking the axe up right where she left off [1] [2]. I would have thought you'd have got that from her often repeated mantra that you aren't a human.
I didn't realize that either. Makes sense though. Man, what a cavalcade of crazy she was. And apparently still is.

Mathsci
Critic
Posts: 117
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 5:40 am
Wikipedia User: Mathsci
Wikipedia Review Member: Mathsci

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by Mathsci » Sat Jan 26, 2013 2:20 am

The Devil's Advocate wrote:
Volunteer Marek wrote:Eh, YRC made an idiotic comment and Maunus responded in a way which idiotic comments deserve. He then self reverted within minutes and subsequently voluntarily resigned his adminship (if I'm reading this right). Not sure how you can fault Maunus here.
Characters such as Maunus are all about creating these types of situations in order to "win" at Wikipedia. I fault Maunus, because Maunus is responsible for creating the situation and is also responsible for aggravating it further.
Maunus is a talented anthropologist specialising in meso-America. He is an asset to wikipedia. There's no shortage of people to edit or monitor BLPs, so YRC's absence is not a great loss.

User avatar
HRIP7
Denizen
Posts: 6953
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:05 am
Wikipedia User: Jayen466
Wikipedia Review Member: HRIP7
Actual Name: Andreas Kolbe
Location: UK

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by HRIP7 » Sat Jan 26, 2013 2:52 am

Mathsci wrote:
The Devil's Advocate wrote:
Volunteer Marek wrote:Eh, YRC made an idiotic comment and Maunus responded in a way which idiotic comments deserve. He then self reverted within minutes and subsequently voluntarily resigned his adminship (if I'm reading this right). Not sure how you can fault Maunus here.
Characters such as Maunus are all about creating these types of situations in order to "win" at Wikipedia. I fault Maunus, because Maunus is responsible for creating the situation and is also responsible for aggravating it further.
Maunus is a talented anthropologist specialising in meso-America. He is an asset to wikipedia. There's no shortage of people to edit or monitor BLPs, so YRC's absence is not a great loss.
The first two statements I believe are quite correct. I disagree with the other two.

User avatar
The Devil's Advocate
Habitué
Posts: 1920
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 12:19 am
Wikipedia User: The Devil's Advocate

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by The Devil's Advocate » Sat Jan 26, 2013 3:24 am

Mathsci wrote:Maunus is a talented anthropologist specialising in meso-America. He is an asset to wikipedia. There's no shortage of people to edit or monitor BLPs, so YRC's absence is not a great loss.
There is actually a shortage of people, even when it comes to removing obvious vandalism. Never mind the more subtle POV-pushing on BLPs, which can be much more taxing and time-consuming to address. As for being an asset due to expertise in a specific field, that should not lead to magical immunity in all areas of the site or even in the area relevant to their credentials. Many credentialed editors try to use their real-life status as a get-out-of-jail-free card or a license to kill regardless of where they are acting badly. You have played your credentials many times in your disputes to try and get out of trouble, just like you play Echigo mole or the Deviant Art editors, and it doesn't even have relevance since your problems are nearly always outside your actual area of expertise.

Being "a talented anthropologist specialising in meso-America" does not mean Maunus has a lock on every subject that concerns human beings. No amount of credentials eliminates the potential for bias. If anything, it aggravates existing biases as a credentialed expert will be more self-assured and is likely much better at rationalizing. His attacks on YRC were ignorant and showed a failure to grasp the context of the situation due to his own personal biases, both regarding the subject under discussion and regarding YRC himself. It was not about adding anything of value or doing anything constructive, but was instead all about getting at someone he doesn't like.

"For those who stubbornly seek freedom around the world, there can be no more urgent task than to come to understand the mechanisms and practices of indoctrination."

- Noam Chomsky


Mathsci
Critic
Posts: 117
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 5:40 am
Wikipedia User: Mathsci
Wikipedia Review Member: Mathsci

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by Mathsci » Sat Jan 26, 2013 3:45 am

The Devil's Advocate wrote:
Mathsci wrote:Maunus is a talented anthropologist specialising in meso-America. He is an asset to wikipedia. There's no shortage of people to edit or monitor BLPs, so YRC's absence is not a great loss.
There is actually a shortage of people, even when it comes to removing obvious vandalism. Never mind the more subtle POV-pushing on BLPs, which can be much more taxing and time-consuming to address. As for being an asset due to expertise in a specific field, that should not lead to magical immunity in all areas of the site or even in the area relevant to their credentials. Many credentialed editors try to use their real-life status as a get-out-of-jail-free card or a license to kill regardless of where they are acting badly. You have played your credentials many times in your disputes to try and get out of trouble, just like you play Echigo mole or the Deviant Art editors, and it doesn't even have relevance since your problems are nearly always outside your actual area of expertise.

Being "a talented anthropologist specialising in meso-America" does not mean Maunus has a lock on every subject that concerns human beings. No amount of credentials eliminates the potential for bias. If anything, it aggravates existing biases as a credentialed expert will be more self-assured and is likely much better at rationalizing. His attacks on YRC were ignorant and showed a failure to grasp the context of the situation due to his own personal biases, both regarding the subject under discussion and regarding YRC himself. It was not about adding anything of value or doing anything constructive, but was instead all about getting at someone he doesn't like.
Maunus adds content in encyclopedic areas, is perceptive and has good powers of judgement. Unlike you.

Hex
Retired
Posts: 4130
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:40 pm
Wikipedia User: Scott
Location: London

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by Hex » Sat Jan 26, 2013 10:27 am

Mathsci wrote:Maunus adds content in encyclopedic areas, is perceptive and has good powers of judgement. Unlike you.
:popcorn:
My question, to this esteemed Wiki community, is this: Do you think that a Wiki could successfully generate a useful encyclopedia? -- JimboWales
Yes, but in the end it wouldn't be an encyclopedia. It would be a wiki. -- WardCunningham (Jan 2001)

User avatar
SB_Johnny
Habitué
Posts: 4640
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:26 am
Wikipedia User: SB_Johnny
Wikipedia Review Member: SB_Johnny

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by SB_Johnny » Sat Jan 26, 2013 1:20 pm

Hex wrote:
Mathsci wrote:Maunus adds content in encyclopedic areas, is perceptive and has good powers of judgement. Unlike you.
:popcorn:
Wrong smiley. This is the one you want: :slapfight:
This is not a signature.

Hex
Retired
Posts: 4130
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:40 pm
Wikipedia User: Scott
Location: London

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by Hex » Sat Jan 26, 2013 1:23 pm

SB_Johnny wrote:
Hex wrote: :popcorn:
Wrong smiley. This is the one you want: :slapfight:
True dat.
My question, to this esteemed Wiki community, is this: Do you think that a Wiki could successfully generate a useful encyclopedia? -- JimboWales
Yes, but in the end it wouldn't be an encyclopedia. It would be a wiki. -- WardCunningham (Jan 2001)

User avatar
The Devil's Advocate
Habitué
Posts: 1920
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 12:19 am
Wikipedia User: The Devil's Advocate

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by The Devil's Advocate » Sat Jan 26, 2013 6:49 pm

Mathsci wrote:Maunus adds content in encyclopedic areas, is perceptive and has good powers of judgement. Unlike you.

"For those who stubbornly seek freedom around the world, there can be no more urgent task than to come to understand the mechanisms and practices of indoctrination."

- Noam Chomsky


User avatar
Captain Occam
Gregarious
Posts: 886
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 12:08 am

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by Captain Occam » Sat Jan 26, 2013 8:11 pm

TDA, whenever you're planning to get more involved in race articles I hope you can learn to get along with Maunus, because I think he's more reasonable than most of the debunker types. The difference between him and someone like ArtifexMayhem is that I think Maunus usually cares more about improving the quality of the articles than about making them conform to his own viewpoint, and as a result I was usually able to reach compromises with him, even though he also gets overly emotional sometimes. Something you might not have known is that he was one of the people who opposed Ferahgo being topic-banned from race articles, because at that point she was one of the only people left who cared about the hereditarian viewpoint being adequately represented in the articles, and Maunus was concerned about their viewpoint being shifted to the opposite extreme if ArbCom got rid of her also.

Mathsci
Critic
Posts: 117
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 5:40 am
Wikipedia User: Mathsci
Wikipedia Review Member: Mathsci

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by Mathsci » Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:51 pm

Captain Occam wrote:TDA, whenever you're planning to get more involved in race articles ....
Internet troll to the rescue

jd turk
Contributor
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 2:05 am
Wikipedia Review Member: jd turk

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by jd turk » Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:04 pm

Mathsci wrote:
Captain Occam wrote:TDA, whenever you're planning to get more involved in race articles ....
Internet troll to the rescue
Ah, lovely. Can't wait to see how that twisted line of logic plays out.

Mathsci
Critic
Posts: 117
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 5:40 am
Wikipedia User: Mathsci
Wikipedia Review Member: Mathsci

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by Mathsci » Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:52 am

jd turk wrote:Ah, lovely. Can't wait to see how that twisted line of logic plays out.
Well the Texas furry has made their first edit ever to the talk page. Birds of a feather ...

User avatar
Tarc
Habitué
Posts: 1569
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 1:31 am
Wikipedia User: Tarc

Re: Wikipedia's 1,000,000-edit editor to be banned

Unread post by Tarc » Sat Feb 16, 2013 4:13 am

Mathsci wrote:
jd turk wrote:Ah, lovely. Can't wait to see how that twisted line of logic plays out.
Well the Texas furry has made their first edit ever to the talk page. Birds of a feather ...
Hm, good luck there. Seren didn't fare so well the last time he dipped a toe into a true Wikipedia hot-button topic area.

(fixed url, you're welcome)
"The world needs bad men. We keep the other bad men from the door."