Re: Jeffrey Epstein
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:25 pm
Prince Andrew so compromised that Trump no longer knows him.
https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/trump ... 4409541911
https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/trump ... 4409541911
So says the child rape apologist.Poetlister wrote: ↑Tue Dec 03, 2019 3:57 pmIt seems that nobody is saying that Prince Andrew himself received massages, still less that he had sex with anyone.
Ms Giuffre is reported as saying "He is the most hideous dancer I've ever seen. It was horrible and this guy was sweating all over me, his sweat was like it was raining basically everywhere." I have seen film of Prince Andrew dancing, and he looked OK. Obviously, that would never have been on TV if he were a horrible dancer. And has anyone ever seen anyone sweating like that?
She also said "In the car Ghislaine tells me that I have to do for Andrew what I do for Jeffrey". i tis not clear that this is having sex. but even if it were, this was in London and she was 17 while the age of consent is 16. Obviously, forcing someone to have sex against their will is rape, but in this case it could not have been child rape.
I suggest that accusing a living person of a crime for which he has not been charged, much less tried, is defamatory, and anyway this thread has long ceased to be relevant to Wikipedia, so it might be better in the Off-topic forum.
People who like to accuse others of child rape seem to be oblivious of the person who is, according to Elon Musk, a "pedo guy" and child rapist. But maybe that's less fun?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertai ... 050190001/The woman Prince Andrew has said he doesn't remember meeting told her story during an interview with the BBC,, reiterating her allegations that he had sex with her three times two decades ago when she was 17.
You're a disgusting excuse for a human being, PL, and I sincerely hope you're hit by a fucking bus."One such powerful individual Epstein forced (Roberts) to have sexual relations with was a member of the British Royal Family, Prince Andrew (a/k/a Duke of York)," the filing said. She alleged she was underage at the time and the illicit sex took place in London, in New York, and "on Epstein's private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands (in an orgy with numerous other under-aged girls)."
Did you not read this quote the first time?Poetlister wrote: ↑Tue Dec 03, 2019 3:57 pmIt seems that nobody is saying that Prince Andrew himself received massages, still less that he had sex with anyone.
According to a sworn deposition by Juan Alessi, a former employee at Epstein’s Palm Beach estate, Andrew attended naked pool parties and was treated to massages by a harem of adolescent girls. At least three of the girls were questioned under oath about whether Andrew had had sexual contact with any of the masseuses. One of them, Sarah Kellen, refused to answer, citing her Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. Another, Adriana Ross, was asked, “Has Prince Andrew ever been involved with underage minor females to your knowledge?” She reportedly replied, “I refuse to answer.”
I was discussing the article that had just been linked, which said "Five women who accuse Jeffrey Epstein of abusing them say Prince Andrew witnessed how people were given massages at the sex offender's homes."Giraffe Stapler wrote: ↑Tue Dec 03, 2019 11:00 pmDid you not read this quote the first time?Poetlister wrote: ↑Tue Dec 03, 2019 3:57 pmIt seems that nobody is saying that Prince Andrew himself received massages, still less that he had sex with anyone.According to a sworn deposition by Juan Alessi, a former employee at Epstein’s Palm Beach estate, Andrew attended naked pool parties and was treated to massages by a harem of adolescent girls. At least three of the girls were questioned under oath about whether Andrew had had sexual contact with any of the masseuses. One of them, Sarah Kellen, refused to answer, citing her Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. Another, Adriana Ross, was asked, “Has Prince Andrew ever been involved with underage minor females to your knowledge?” She reportedly replied, “I refuse to answer.”
That was over a week ago. Why is it only just making the news now, if it is at all?10920 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 4:07 pmThe story continues...
Jeffrey Epstein’s private wealth banker, who brokered and signed off on untold multiple millions of dollars in controversial Deutsche Bank and Citibank loans spanning two decades for the convicted pedophile, has died from a reported suicide.
The news of yet another mysterious Epstein-linked death comes shortly after the FBI was seeking to interview the bank executive about loans he approved for Epstein and the indicted child trafficker’s labyrinth of US-based and offshore companies.
https://truepundit.com/jeffrey-epsteins ... ioned-him/
So who are they and how credible are they? (Not very, it looks like, but maybe I am missing something.)Wikispooks was established in 2010 as a collaborative space for the joint re-examination of recent history. We research people and groups not subject to proper scrutiny by corporate media and as such, poorly treated by Wikipedia. Wikispooks is particularly focused on those official narratives which do not seem to fit the facts, such as the 9/11 event and concepts such as the "war on terror" or the "war on drugs".
Our 674 registered editors have made 20,940 pages (9,821 people, 2,861 groups, 878 events...) supplemented by 1,663 third party documents.
No, as far as I can tell it's not remotely credible.Carcharoth wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 4:13 pmWhile looking for more information, I found 'Wikispooks':
Thomas Bowers (WikiSpooks)
Wikispooks:About
So who are they and how credible are they? (Not very, it looks like, but maybe I am missing something.)Wikispooks was established in 2010 as a collaborative space for the joint re-examination of recent history. We research people and groups not subject to proper scrutiny by corporate media and as such, poorly treated by Wikipedia. Wikispooks is particularly focused on those official narratives which do not seem to fit the facts, such as the 9/11 event and concepts such as the "war on terror" or the "war on drugs".
Our 674 registered editors have made 20,940 pages (9,821 people, 2,861 groups, 878 events...) supplemented by 1,663 third party documents.
Child rapists are like that.Prince Andrew has provided "zero cooperation" in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein's network of enablers, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York said Monday.
Andrew, who has been accused of having sex with a teenage girl trafficked by Epstein, has publicly indicated that he would be willing to assist in any investigation related to the case.
But U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman, speaking outside the late financier's mansion in New York City, said the FBI and New York prosecutors have reached out to the prince and his attorneys but have yet to receive any assistance from him.
"To date, Prince Andrew has provided zero cooperation," Berman said.
Buckingham Palace did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
There is no suggestion that Prince Andrew is a "child rapist", as the alleged offence happened in London, and the age of consent in the UK is 16. It may be unseemly, but it's not rape.Vigilant wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 9:22 pmPrince Andrew has provided 'zero cooperation' in Epstein probeChild rapists are like that.Prince Andrew has provided "zero cooperation" in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein's network of enablers, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York said Monday.
Andrew, who has been accused of having sex with a teenage girl trafficked by Epstein, has publicly indicated that he would be willing to assist in any investigation related to the case.
But U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman, speaking outside the late financier's mansion in New York City, said the FBI and New York prosecutors have reached out to the prince and his attorneys but have yet to receive any assistance from him.
"To date, Prince Andrew has provided zero cooperation," Berman said.
Buckingham Palace did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
There was no consent and she's a minor child, shitbag.Eric Corbett wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 9:37 pmThere is no suggestion that Prince Andrew is a "child rapist", as the alleged offence happened in London, and the age of consent in the UK is 16. It may be unseemly, but it's not rape.Vigilant wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 9:22 pmPrince Andrew has provided 'zero cooperation' in Epstein probeChild rapists are like that.Prince Andrew has provided "zero cooperation" in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein's network of enablers, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York said Monday.
Andrew, who has been accused of having sex with a teenage girl trafficked by Epstein, has publicly indicated that he would be willing to assist in any investigation related to the case.
But U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman, speaking outside the late financier's mansion in New York City, said the FBI and New York prosecutors have reached out to the prince and his attorneys but have yet to receive any assistance from him.
"To date, Prince Andrew has provided zero cooperation," Berman said.
Buckingham Palace did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
She may be a "minor child" under US law, but not under UK law, where the alleged offence took place.Vigilant wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 9:43 pmThere was no consent and she's a minor child, shitbag.Eric Corbett wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 9:37 pmThere is no suggestion that Prince Andrew is a "child rapist", as the alleged offence happened in London, and the age of consent in the UK is 16. It may be unseemly, but it's not rape.Vigilant wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 9:22 pmPrince Andrew has provided 'zero cooperation' in Epstein probeChild rapists are like that.Prince Andrew has provided "zero cooperation" in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein's network of enablers, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York said Monday.
Andrew, who has been accused of having sex with a teenage girl trafficked by Epstein, has publicly indicated that he would be willing to assist in any investigation related to the case.
But U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman, speaking outside the late financier's mansion in New York City, said the FBI and New York prosecutors have reached out to the prince and his attorneys but have yet to receive any assistance from him.
"To date, Prince Andrew has provided zero cooperation," Berman said.
Buckingham Palace did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
You are so fucking gross.Eric Corbett wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 9:46 pmShe may be a "minor child" under US law, but not under UK law, where the alleged offence took place.Vigilant wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 9:43 pmThere was no consent and she's a minor child, shitbag.Eric Corbett wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 9:37 pmThere is no suggestion that Prince Andrew is a "child rapist", as the alleged offence happened in London, and the age of consent in the UK is 16. It may be unseemly, but it's not rape.Vigilant wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 9:22 pmPrince Andrew has provided 'zero cooperation' in Epstein probeChild rapists are like that.Prince Andrew has provided "zero cooperation" in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein's network of enablers, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York said Monday.
Andrew, who has been accused of having sex with a teenage girl trafficked by Epstein, has publicly indicated that he would be willing to assist in any investigation related to the case.
But U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman, speaking outside the late financier's mansion in New York City, said the FBI and New York prosecutors have reached out to the prince and his attorneys but have yet to receive any assistance from him.
"To date, Prince Andrew has provided zero cooperation," Berman said.
Buckingham Palace did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Whereas you, of course are a paragon of all the virtues?
You allow Vigilant to rant and rave, so I guess it's up to you whether you want him to continue ranting and raving.