Israel

Wikipedia in the news - rip and read.
User avatar
Kingsindian
Habitué
Posts: 2593
kołdry
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 10:07 am
Wikipedia User: Kingsindian

Re: Jerusalem Battle Now Plays Out on Wikipedia

Unread post by Kingsindian » Mon Dec 11, 2017 7:52 am

This is mostly overblown. As the lead for the English version for Jerusalem (T-H-L) notes:
Israelis and Palestinians both claim Jerusalem as their capital, as the State of Israel maintains its primary governmental institutions there while the State of Palestine ultimately foresees the city as its seat of power; however, neither claim is widely recognized internationally.
On the Israel (T-H-L) article, the lead says:
...while its seat of government and proclaimed capital is Jerusalem, although the state's sovereignty over Jerusalem is not recognised internationally.
Infoboxes are, of course, space-limited and lack nuance. There has been some recent edit-warring on the infobox at the Israel article. The final version hasn't been settled yet.

User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way
Contact:

Re: Jerusalem Battle Now Plays Out on Wikipedia

Unread post by Poetlister » Mon Dec 11, 2017 9:21 pm

Obviously, this is a classic example of the diferent POVs that editors in different languages are likely to have. I expect that for example the Turkish WP's view is similar to the Arabic one while the Armenian and Kurdish ones may be closer to the Hebrew.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

Renée Bagslint
Gregarious
Posts: 745
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:23 pm

Re: Jerusalem Battle Now Plays Out on Wikipedia

Unread post by Renée Bagslint » Mon Dec 11, 2017 10:15 pm

Meanwhile, according to Wikidata the capital is Jerusalem. So that's sorted out, then.

User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way
Contact:

Re: Jerusalem Battle Now Plays Out on Wikipedia

Unread post by Poetlister » Tue Dec 12, 2017 2:21 pm

Renée Bagslint wrote:Meanwhile, according to Wikidata the capital is Jerusalem. So that's sorted out, then.
That's what Wikidata is for, isn't it? Harmonising information across all sites.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

User avatar
Kumioko
Muted
Posts: 6609
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 2:36 am
Wikipedia User: Kumioko; Reguyla
Nom de plume: Persona non grata

Re: Jerusalem Battle Now Plays Out on Wikipedia

Unread post by Kumioko » Wed Dec 13, 2017 4:07 pm

At the end of the day, Israel proclaims it's capital as Jerusalem, that is where the majority of the government is run from, where the prime minister lives, etc. It shouldn't be our place or any other countries to say we don't recognize your capital. It would be like Russia saying we don't recognize DC as the capital of the US so we are putting our embassy in New York.

Having said that, it will take several years to do the planning and the move for the Embassy and a lot can change in that time. In fact the move will most likely not happen until the next presidency, whether that is Trump or someone else. So it's still possible some future president could undo his decision and say they are staying in Tel Aviv.

Wikipedia should just protect the article and monitor the changes. It is going to be fluid and contentious for a while and those topics are historically hostile anyway.

User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way
Contact:

Re: Jerusalem Battle Now Plays Out on Wikipedia

Unread post by Poetlister » Wed Dec 13, 2017 9:52 pm

Wikipedia policy is clear. Report what reliable siorces say. For example, Encyclopaedia Britannica says:
Although Israel’s actions were repeatedly condemned by the UN and other bodies, Israel reaffirmed Jerusalem’s standing as its capital by promulgating a special law in 1980. The status of the city remained a central issue in the dispute between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs, who claim east Jerusalem as the capital of a future Palestinian state.
Anything else is original research.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

Renée Bagslint
Gregarious
Posts: 745
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:23 pm

Re: Jerusalem Battle Now Plays Out on Wikipedia

Unread post by Renée Bagslint » Fri Dec 22, 2017 8:27 pm

Kumioko wrote:It shouldn't be our place or any other countries to say we don't recognize your capital.
If only it were that simple. Which city is the capital of Taiwan -- Taipei or Beijing?

User avatar
Midsize Jake
Site Admin
Posts: 9952
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:10 pm
Wikipedia Review Member: Somey

Re: Jerusalem Battle Now Plays Out on Wikipedia

Unread post by Midsize Jake » Fri Dec 22, 2017 8:44 pm

Renée Bagslint wrote:
Kumioko wrote:It shouldn't be our place or any other countries to say we don't recognize your capital.
If only it were that simple. Which city is the capital of Taiwan -- Taipei or Beijing?
Yeah, I'm afraid Mr. Kumioko's argument is kind of absurd in light of real-world events and human behavior. By the same logic, we should put our embassy to South Korea in Pyongyang, and everyone else should put their embassies to the USA in Moscow, at least until 2021.

User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way
Contact:

Re: Jerusalem Battle Now Plays Out on Wikipedia

Unread post by Poetlister » Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:47 pm

Renée Bagslint wrote:
Kumioko wrote:It shouldn't be our place or any other countries to say we don't recognize your capital.
If only it were that simple. Which city is the capital of Taiwan -- Taipei or Beijing?
That is a different issue - is Taiwan an independent country? In fact, the US does not recognise Taiwan and has no embassy there. I'm not sure if anyone recognises Taiwan. Of course, many of the countries making a fuss, such as that pillar of democracy and human rights Iran, don't recognise Israel and have no embassy there anyway.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

User avatar
Midsize Jake
Site Admin
Posts: 9952
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:10 pm
Wikipedia Review Member: Somey

Re: Jerusalem Battle Now Plays Out on Wikipedia

Unread post by Midsize Jake » Sat Dec 23, 2017 10:18 pm

Poetlister wrote:That is a different issue - is Taiwan an independent country? In fact, the US does not recognise Taiwan and has no embassy there. I'm not sure if anyone recognises Taiwan. Of course, many of the countries making a fuss, such as that pillar of democracy and human rights Iran, don't recognise Israel and have no embassy there anyway.
Firstly, Taiwan, aka the Republic of China (ROC) is a de facto independent country. There are 20 countries (including the Vatican) that maintain formal relations with the ROC, listed in the Political status of Taiwan (T-H-L) article. Most of them are small, and many of them probably recognize it because it's important to their shipping industries. (The list is about halfway down the article; the paragraph just above the list is full of typographical and grammatical errors btw, which is probably just how the Communist Chinese like it.)

Secondly, just because it's a different scenario doesn't mean the situation there isn't germane to the one in Jerusalem. What's happening is that a country with nuclear weapons that's also in a long-running war with some of its own people is using its newly-minted "close relations" with a Republican administration in Washington to throw its weight around, all in an effort to further demoralize the people it's been at war with. This is almost exactly what happened in 1971, when the Communist Chinese got the Nixon Administration to withdraw their support for ROC membership in the UN and, concurrently, its recognition of the ROC as an independent nation.

Long story short, the issue isn't one of semantics or "recognition" or the formal definition of the word "capital." The issue here is whether or not people want to participate in further attempts to demoralize the Palestinians. Mind you, I'm not going to ignore the harsh realities involved and say that Jerusalem (be it the Eastern section or any other) would be more Western-tourist-friendly under Palestinian control; obviously it would not, but let's not pretend that this is all some sort of "formality"; this is deliberate, ruthless, and nasty international politics, and it's utterly stupid for the USA to be involved in it at all, which is why Trump did what he did. He's just an utterly stupid person. Simple as that.

User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way
Contact:

Re: Jerusalem Battle Now Plays Out on Wikipedia

Unread post by Poetlister » Sat Dec 23, 2017 10:41 pm

If we're going by de facto, nobody doubts that Jerusalem has been the de facto capital of Israel almost since Israel's creation. Many heads of state have been to Jerusalem as part of state visits, and met the President of Israel there. That includes the Pope.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

User avatar
Midsize Jake
Site Admin
Posts: 9952
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:10 pm
Wikipedia Review Member: Somey

Re: Jerusalem Battle Now Plays Out on Wikipedia

Unread post by Midsize Jake » Sat Dec 23, 2017 10:52 pm

Poetlister wrote:If we're going by de facto, nobody doubts that Jerusalem has been the de facto capital of Israel almost since Israel's creation. Many heads of state have been to Jerusalem as part of state visits, and met the President of Israel there. That includes the Pope.
The mere fact that state visits occur there doesn't make it the de facto capital. They could call it the "traditional" or "ceremonial" capital, and maybe the Palestinians wouldn't even mind so much, but the de facto capital has always been Tel Aviv and remains so, at least from the international perspective.

User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way
Contact:

Re: Jerusalem Battle Now Plays Out on Wikipedia

Unread post by Poetlister » Sat Dec 23, 2017 10:59 pm

Midsize Jake wrote:
Poetlister wrote:If we're going by de facto, nobody doubts that Jerusalem has been the de facto capital of Israel almost since Israel's creation. Many heads of state have been to Jerusalem as part of state visits, and met the President of Israel there. That includes the Pope.
The mere fact that state visits occur there doesn't make it the de facto capital. They could call it the "traditional" or "ceremonial" capital, and maybe the Palestinians wouldn't even mind so much, but the de facto capital has always been Tel Aviv and remains so, at least from the international perspective.
That's the exact opposite of the truth. For ceremonial purposes, embassies are in Tel Aviv. But the Parliament, President's residence and main Government offices are all in Jerusalem, and everyone knows and accepts that. And the Arabs would not accept the term "traditional" capital. Many even deny that there was ever a Jewish Temple on Temple Mount.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

User avatar
Kingsindian
Habitué
Posts: 2593
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 10:07 am
Wikipedia User: Kingsindian

Re: Jerusalem Battle Now Plays Out on Wikipedia

Unread post by Kingsindian » Sun Dec 24, 2017 4:19 am

The history is rather complicated. When Israel became a state in 1948, the capital was in Tel Aviv and the Knesset was located there. It was moved to Jerusalem in 1949 (specifically to frustrate attempts made in the Lausanne Conference of 1949 (T-H-L), which tried to declare Jerusalem an "international city"). The Foreign Ministry didn't move to Jerusalem till 1953.

Anyway, this matter is too complicated for an infobox, so it is not surprising that an infobox lacks nuance.

User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way
Contact:

Pro-Israel Group Launches Initiative Fighting Back Against Anti-Israel Wikipedia Editors

Unread post by Poetlister » Sat Nov 16, 2019 9:27 pm

Last week, a pro-Israel group called The Israel Group launched an important campaign in the broader fight back against the anti-Israel hostility that pervades high-profile media and educational institutions.
Daily Wire

It seems that the new software allows longer thread titles - good.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

User avatar
Ada Sinn
Critic
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2019 5:48 pm

Re: Pro-Israel Group Launches Initiative Fighting Back Against Anti-Israel Wikipedia Editors

Unread post by Ada Sinn » Sat Nov 16, 2019 11:10 pm

we’ll also guide people who care about Israel on how they can become experienced editors capable of fighting back
More drama coming up in 2020.
<|>

User avatar
Midsize Jake
Site Admin
Posts: 9952
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:10 pm
Wikipedia Review Member: Somey

Re: Pro-Israel Group Launches Initiative Fighting Back Against Anti-Israel Wikipedia Editors

Unread post by Midsize Jake » Sun Nov 17, 2019 8:29 am

Poetlister wrote:
Sat Nov 16, 2019 9:27 pm
It seems that the new software allows longer thread titles - good.
It went from 64 to 100, but everyone please bear in mind that Google cuts the titles off at 64 when it displays them in search results.

User avatar
Midsize Jake
Site Admin
Posts: 9952
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:10 pm
Wikipedia Review Member: Somey

Re: Pro-Israel Group Launches Initiative Fighting Back Against Anti-Israel Wikipedia Editors

Unread post by Midsize Jake » Sun Nov 17, 2019 9:03 am

Also, is it normal for the Daily Wire to promote doxxing sites? Because that's exactly what they're doing.

User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way
Contact:

Re: Pro-Israel Group Launches Initiative Fighting Back Against Anti-Israel Wikipedia Editors

Unread post by Poetlister » Sun Nov 17, 2019 9:44 am

Midsize Jake wrote:
Sun Nov 17, 2019 8:29 am
Poetlister wrote:
Sat Nov 16, 2019 9:27 pm
It seems that the new software allows longer thread titles - good.
It went from 64 to 100, but everyone please bear in mind that Google cuts the titles off at 64 when it displays them in search results.
This is for me only an issue on the news items. I have often had problems cutting down the headline to fit into 64 characters; it makes life easier on here, at any rate.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

User avatar
Icewhiz
Banned
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2019 11:24 am
Wikipedia User: Icewhiz

Re: Pro-Israel Group Launches Initiative Fighting Back Against Anti-Israel Wikipedia Editors

Unread post by Icewhiz » Sun Nov 17, 2019 11:14 am

Midsize Jake wrote:
Sun Nov 17, 2019 9:03 am
Also, is it normal for the Daily Wire to promote doxxing sites? Because that's exactly what they're doing.
Most news organizations do not have an issue with exposing anti-Semitic individuals that spread hate online - they would almost always be willing to publish the names of such individuals themselves - assuming that they can prove the identity (per standards of the news organization) and connect the identity with specific hate content.

In the real world most people are more concerned with preventing the dissemination of hate online that protecting the identity of individuals that disseminate such hate.

User avatar
Midsize Jake
Site Admin
Posts: 9952
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:10 pm
Wikipedia Review Member: Somey

Re: Pro-Israel Group Launches Initiative Fighting Back Against Anti-Israel Wikipedia Editors

Unread post by Midsize Jake » Mon Nov 18, 2019 5:41 am

Icewhiz wrote:
Sun Nov 17, 2019 11:14 am
Most news organizations do not have an issue with exposing anti-Semitic individuals that spread hate online...
Most right-wing news organizations don't have an issue with doxxing people (based on some nebulous private definition of "anti-semitic" or whatever else) if it's politically expedient for them to do so, you mean. The Daily Wire is a right-wing news organization. (Some might even call it a right-wing "fake news" organization.) Still, I didn't think they were into promoting doxxing sites... I must have been horribly naive.

So does this mean that arguing over the reliability of sources or the emphasis placed on a particular aspect of an historical event is "disseminating hate" now? Apparently so... Meanwhile, actual hate-disseminators are given military-grade weapons, elected to powerful positions in government, paid millions to host shows on Fox News, etc., etc.

Look, I get it - Wikipedia is a key information source, and it's easy to sit in your chair and blame Wikipedians for the fact that your preferred article sources or word choices or photo selections aren't getting sufficient "consensus." That's why we all do it, in fact — because it's easy. You just sit there in that chair, all nice and relaxing, blaming those Wikipedians... But this approach has never worked before, and I doubt it will work now. I'll admit that being nice to them doesn't work either, but there has to be a better way, no?

User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way
Contact:

Re: Pro-Israel Group Launches Initiative Fighting Back Against Anti-Israel Wikipedia Editors

Unread post by Poetlister » Sat Nov 23, 2019 8:34 pm

Wikipedia’s Anti-Israel Editors Unmasked
Group launches effort to combat anti-Israel bias on internet's largest encyclopedia
Washington Free Beacon
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

Cla68
Habitué
Posts: 2389
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:43 pm
Wikipedia User: Cla68

Re: Pro-Israel Group Launches Initiative Fighting Back Against Anti-Israel Wikipedia Editors

Unread post by Cla68 » Sun Nov 24, 2019 3:36 pm

Aren't many of the "anti-Israel" or "anti-Semitic" people on the Internet actually anti-Zionist followers of Reform Judaism? I've read that the current political battle is not really Jews against anti-Semites, but more of Zionist Jews against progressive Reformist Jews, although both sides have plenty of secular (non-Jewish) allies.

User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way
Contact:

Re: Pro-Israel Group Launches Initiative Fighting Back Against Anti-Israel Wikipedia Editors

Unread post by Poetlister » Sun Nov 24, 2019 6:46 pm

Cla68 wrote:
Sun Nov 24, 2019 3:36 pm
Aren't many of the "anti-Israel" or "anti-Semitic" people on the Internet actually anti-Zionist followers of Reform Judaism? I've read that the current political battle is not really Jews against anti-Semites, but more of Zionist Jews against progressive Reformist Jews, although both sides have plenty of secular (non-Jewish) allies.
I think it will come as a shock to Reform Jews to discover that they are anti-Zionists. Yes, of course there are some Jews who are anti-Zionist, even some very orthodox ones (how they recocile that with praying three times a day for the restoration of the country of Israel is beyond me), but I doubt that any mainstream Jewish movement would endorse that. In Britain, the anti-Zionist "Jewish Voice for Labour" has been condemned even by Jeremy Corbyn's staunch supporter Jon Lansman for being totally unconnected with the Jewish community.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

User avatar
di m
Contributor
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:25 am
Actual Name: Dima Monsky

Pro-Israel Activists Declare War on Wikipedia’s ‘Anti-Israel Bias’

Unread post by di m » Thu Dec 19, 2019 12:26 pm

unitedwithisrael.org/pro-israel-activists-declare-war-on-wikipedias-anti-israel-bias/

User avatar
Randy from Boise
Been Around Forever
Posts: 12243
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:32 am
Wikipedia User: Carrite
Wikipedia Review Member: Timbo
Actual Name: Tim Davenport
Nom de plume: T. Chandler
Location: Boise, Idaho

Re: Pro-Israel Activists Declare War on Wikipedia’s ‘Anti-Israel Bias’

Unread post by Randy from Boise » Thu Dec 19, 2019 2:47 pm

Organized efforts to insert pro-nationalist skew into Wikipedia content revealed...
The Israel Group has launched a campaign to battle Wikipedia’s “anti-Israel bias,” while exposing the identities of top Wikipedia editors who use the popular online platform to promote hostility towards the Jewish state.

The Israel Group’s initiative will include a dedicated website that shows how “anti-Israel editors smear Israel—both subtly and overtly—across hundreds of articles, and how the pro-Israel community can stop it.”

The Israel Group is a nonprofit that aims to protect Israel in the Diaspora by developing and launching initiatives to cripple the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement.

The organization has been working for many years on the confidential “Wiki-Israel” initiative against anti-Israel bias on Wikipedia.
This is old news, as Zionist flagwavers have long made the Israel-Palestine topic an ideological battleground. I would not be surprised in the least if the first evidence of state-funded Wikipedia editing to skew content isn't exposed as a Russian effort or a Chinese effort, but an Israeli one.

Distasteful regimes are afraid of the truth and go to great lengths to skew coverage.

RfB

User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way
Contact:

Re: Pro-Israel Activists Declare War on Wikipedia’s ‘Anti-Israel Bias’

Unread post by Poetlister » Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:25 pm

I started this thread on the topic last month. It's scarcely news that there are often organised attempts on Wikipedia to set the record straight in particular areas.


Moderator's note: Threads merged.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

User avatar
di m
Contributor
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:25 am
Actual Name: Dima Monsky

Re: Pro-Israel Activists Declare War on Wikipedia’s ‘Anti-Israel Bias’

Unread post by di m » Thu Dec 19, 2019 8:05 pm

Poetlister wrote:
Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:25 pm
I started this thread on the topic last month. It's scarcely news that there are often organised attempts on Wikipedia to set the record straight in particular areas.
Oops...Thanks! Sorry, i am just registered and forum field how to inexperienced)

User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way
Contact:

Re: Pro-Israel Activists Declare War on Wikipedia’s ‘Anti-Israel Bias’

Unread post by Poetlister » Thu Dec 19, 2019 9:36 pm

di m wrote:
Thu Dec 19, 2019 8:05 pm
Poetlister wrote:
Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:25 pm
I started this thread on the topic last month. It's scarcely news that there are often organised attempts on Wikipedia to set the record straight in particular areas.
Oops...Thanks! Sorry, i am just registered and forum field how to inexperienced)
That's quite OK. I'm sorry; I should have realised you're brand new and offered the traditional :welcome: smiley.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

User avatar
Midsize Jake
Site Admin
Posts: 9952
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:10 pm
Wikipedia Review Member: Somey

Re: Pro-Israel Activists Declare War on Wikipedia’s ‘Anti-Israel Bias’

Unread post by Midsize Jake » Thu Dec 19, 2019 9:44 pm

Randy from Boise wrote:
Thu Dec 19, 2019 2:47 pm
I would not be surprised in the least if the first evidence of state-funded Wikipedia editing to skew content isn't exposed as a Russian effort or a Chinese effort, but an Israeli one.
Hmm... :hmmm: I don't mean to burst any bubbles here, but if "evidence" includes eyewitness accounts, then the first country to do this was almost certainly the United States, under the Bush II Administration, as early as 2005-06. Israel probably got into the game around the same time, but that wasn't exposed until 2008 or so, and by 2009-10 they were publicly training people in how to manipulate WP and stories about it were circulating in the Israeli media. I suspect the Russians and Chinese were already doing it by then as well, only with less success — probably because they have better uses for their fluent English speakers (leaving only the poor-to-mediocre talent available for WP manipulation), and the agendas they've pushed have always been much harder to disguise.

Long story short, if you really meant "first," you're about 10 years behind the curve on this.


I too would like to welcome Ms. (or is it Mr.?) di m, but just FYI, after checking out the "Israel Group" website in question last month — as covered by UnitedWithIsrael.com — we decided it would be better not to give them any direct link-juice (miniscule though it might be, amount-wise) because they seem to exist for doxxing purposes only.

User avatar
Tarc
Habitué
Posts: 1569
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 1:31 am
Wikipedia User: Tarc

Re: Pro-Israel Group Launches Initiative Fighting Back Against Anti-Israel Wikipedia Editors

Unread post by Tarc » Fri Dec 20, 2019 1:13 am

Same tune, different decade; Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/CAMERA lobbying (T-H-L)

As before, good sentiment, bad tactics.
"The world needs bad men. We keep the other bad men from the door."

User avatar
di m
Contributor
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:25 am
Actual Name: Dima Monsky

Re: Pro-Israel Activists Declare War on Wikipedia’s ‘Anti-Israel Bias’

Unread post by di m » Fri Dec 20, 2019 1:14 am

doxxing purposes
Harassment Muhammad Ali from doxxing!
Just recklessly he played boxing

User avatar
di m
Contributor
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:25 am
Actual Name: Dima Monsky

Re: Pro-Israel Group Launches Initiative Fighting Back Against Anti-Israel Wikipedia Editors

Unread post by di m » Fri Dec 20, 2019 1:39 am

help to hide hatesemitique?
no one above critique!

User avatar
Midsize Jake
Site Admin
Posts: 9952
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:10 pm
Wikipedia Review Member: Somey

Re: Pro-Israel Group Launches Initiative Fighting Back Against Anti-Israel Wikipedia Editors

Unread post by Midsize Jake » Fri Dec 20, 2019 2:10 am

So you're a poet as well as a translator/adaptor, then?

Look, I know there are a lot of people who still believe that doxxing Wikipedians is the only way to get them to behave responsibly (or to get them to do something you want). And I really have no idea if the people who put up the Israel Group site did their due diligence in researching this — I suspect not, but even if they did, we're probably the only Wikipedia criticism site that's made any kind of attempt to reject that idea, and even that has only been within the last few years. And there have been (and still are) several exceptions we've made.

But this is clearly not one of those exceptions — this is a political disagreement, and the people being doxxed by the Israel Group are not flouting basic morality and are really no danger to anybody. I'm forced to conclude that this is happening because right-wing elements in Israel are upset about their recent electoral setbacks, along with the fact that politicians in other countries now seem less concerned about courting pro-Israeli lobbyists and voters than they have been in the past. So if they won't change their policies, and they can't cajole the Wikipedians, what's left besides intimidation?

Except that intimidation doesn't work as well as it used to. We've seen that in multiple cases. Maybe nothing will work, maybe nothing will ever work, but frankly this is only going to further piss them off.

User avatar
di m
Contributor
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:25 am
Actual Name: Dima Monsky

Re: Pro-Israel Group Launches Initiative Fighting Back Against Anti-Israel Wikipedia Editors

Unread post by di m » Sat Dec 21, 2019 8:05 am

Midsize Jake wrote:
Fri Dec 20, 2019 2:10 am
So you're a poet as well as a translator/adaptor, then?

Look, I know there are a lot of people who still believe that doxxing Wikipedians is the only way to get them to behave responsibly (or to get them to do something you want). And I really have no idea if the people who put up the Israel Group site did their due diligence in researching this — I suspect not, but even if they did, we're probably the only Wikipedia criticism site that's made any kind of attempt to reject that idea, and even that has only been within the last few years. And there have been (and still are) several exceptions we've made.

But this is clearly not one of those exceptions — this is a political disagreement, and the people being doxxed by the Israel Group are not flouting basic morality and are really no danger to anybody. I'm forced to conclude that this is happening because right-wing elements in Israel are upset about their recent electoral setbacks, along with the fact that politicians in other countries now seem less concerned about courting pro-Israeli lobbyists and voters than they have been in the past. So if they won't change their policies, and they can't cajole the Wikipedians, what's left besides intimidation?

Except that intimidation doesn't work as well as it used to. We've seen that in multiple cases. Maybe nothing will work, maybe nothing will ever work, but frankly this is only going to further piss them off.
O, and if You are "doxxing"-intimidating women, f.e. https://twitter.com/HindAbyad - You are criminal twice, feminists won't let me lie

User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way
Contact:

Israeli Librarians Win Global Wikipedia Competion

Unread post by Poetlister » Sat Feb 22, 2020 6:28 pm

Israeli librarians finished first in a recent global competition, making 4,700 edits to Wikipedia pages in a three-week span. The campaign known on social media as #1Lib1Ref (“One Librarian, One Reference”), asks librarians from around the world to both update existing Wikipedia pages with valid references and create new posts altogether, in an effort to spread awareness and combat inaccurate online information.

The awards for the contest, which ran from Jan. 15-Feb. 5, are based on language, not location of the editors. Hebrew-language editors were the most active, Serbian librarians came in second in the competition with 4,100 edits and third place went to French with 2,750. The English language came in fourth with 2,050 online edits.
algemeiner.com
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way
Contact:

MEF: Palestinians "occupying" Google and Wikipedia

Unread post by Poetlister » Sat Apr 25, 2020 9:26 am

Occupation is a word that dominates most debate about Israel, but the truth is that pro-Palestinian propagandists are occupying Google and Wikipedia to keep debunked narratives alive.
Middle East Forum

I don't know how you can "occupy" Google.

And I hope that people won't turn this thread into an argument about the Middle East in general.
Last edited by Midsize Jake on Sat Apr 25, 2020 8:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Changed thread title to something less imflammatory
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

User avatar
The Adversary
Habitué
Posts: 2466
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:01 am
Location: Troll country

Re: MEF: Palestinians "occupying" Google and Wikipedia

Unread post by The Adversary » Sat Apr 25, 2020 4:00 pm

...from the increasingly rabid writer and psychologist Phyllis Chesler (T-H-L), writing for Daniel Pipes (T-H-L)' "stink tank", the Middle East Forum (T-H-L).


Yeah, so credible. :sick:

User avatar
Midsize Jake
Site Admin
Posts: 9952
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:10 pm
Wikipedia Review Member: Somey

Re: MEF: Palestinians "occupying" Google and Wikipedia

Unread post by Midsize Jake » Sat Apr 25, 2020 8:34 pm

This is ridiculous. A lengthy screed about how horrible Palestinians are, and just one short paragraph at the end in which Wikipedia is mentioned once, and that's the headline? Forget the Palestinians, if I were a Wikipedia guy, I'd be livid about this. (Thankfully I'm not, but still, WTF.)

I mean, sure, sensationalist headline writers for dubious news/opinion sites are the bane of everyone's existence and all that, but this is unusually egregious.

Post Reply