MintPress blacklisted on Wikipedia

Wikipedia in the news - rip and read.
User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
kołdry
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way
Contact:

MintPress blacklisted on Wikipedia

Unread post by Poetlister » Sat Aug 03, 2019 4:11 pm

In early June, a small number of partisan Wikipedia editors privately voted to blacklist MintPress News from use as a source on the online encyclopedia website at the behest of a Wikipedia editor who took issue with MintPress’ coverage of current events in Venezuela and Syria. At no point was MintPress ever asked to comment or allowed to respond to any of the allegations made and MintPress is unable to appeal the decision.
mintpressnews.com

Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_268#RfC:_MintPress_News (T-H-L)
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

User avatar
DanMurphy
Habitué
Posts: 3136
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:58 pm
Wikipedia User: Dan Murphy
Wikipedia Review Member: DanMurphy

Re: MintPress blacklisted on Wikipedia

Unread post by DanMurphy » Sat Aug 03, 2019 5:10 pm

Fairly explicit propaganda outfit with some creepy ties to the Assad government in Syria (and this has been public knowledge since at least 2013). So on the one hand, good call.

But on the other, pathetic that it was being used on their website to back up statements of fact for so long.

Katie
Gregarious
Posts: 674
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2018 6:47 pm

Re: MintPress blacklisted on Wikipedia

Unread post by Katie » Sat Aug 03, 2019 5:43 pm

DanMurphy wrote:Fairly explicit propaganda outfit with some creepy ties to the Assad government in Syria (and this has been public knowledge since at least 2013). So on the one hand, good call.

But on the other, pathetic that it was being used on their website to back up statements of fact for so long.
Speaking of propaganda websites with ties to governments, iuvmpress.com is used on Wikipedia as a source in the Human rights in Saudi Arabia (T-H-L) article - while I despise the regime, perhaps a website very likely tied to the Iranian government shouldn't be used as a source there? Here's a story linking iuvmpress to the Iranian government: linkhttps://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKCN1LD2R9[/link].

User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way
Contact:

Re: MintPress blacklisted on Wikipedia

Unread post by Poetlister » Sat Aug 03, 2019 8:22 pm

It takes far too long for someone to notice and care strongly enough to do something about it. Yet another example of the lack of editorial control.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

User avatar
Bezdomni
Habitué
Posts: 2935
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 9:07 pm
Wikipedia User: RosasHills
Location: Monster Vainglory ON (.. party HQ ..)
Contact:

Re: MintPress blacklisted on Wikipedia

Unread post by Bezdomni » Sat Aug 03, 2019 9:40 pm

Katie wrote:Speaking of propaganda websites with ties to governments, iuvmpress.com is used on Wikipedia as a source in the Human rights in Saudi Arabia (T-H-L) article - while I despise the regime, perhaps a website very likely tied to the Iranian government shouldn't be used as a source there? Here's a story linking iuvmpress to the Iranian government: linkhttps://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKCN1LD2R9[/link].
Looks like it was also covered without naming names a few days earlier in the NYT, so I deleted/replaced the 3 refs I found on en.wp. There's only one on fr.wp.
los auberginos

Katie
Gregarious
Posts: 674
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2018 6:47 pm

Re: MintPress blacklisted on Wikipedia

Unread post by Katie » Sat Aug 03, 2019 10:53 pm

Bezdomni wrote:
Katie wrote:Speaking of propaganda websites with ties to governments, iuvmpress.com is used on Wikipedia as a source in the Human rights in Saudi Arabia (T-H-L) article - while I despise the regime, perhaps a website very likely tied to the Iranian government shouldn't be used as a source there? Here's a story linking iuvmpress to the Iranian government: linkhttps://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKCN1LD2R9[/link].
Looks like it was also covered without naming names a few days earlier in the NYT, so I deleted/replaced the 3 refs I found on en.wp. There's only one on fr.wp.
Thank you very much! I suspect it was added by the Ane wiki (T-C-L) paid editor sock ring. They're very likely continuing to edit using accounts like RobZes (T-C-L), Betje57 (T-C-L) and BJohn1087 (T-C-L).

User avatar
Earthy Astringent
Banned
Posts: 1548
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2015 7:16 am

Re: MintPress blacklisted on Wikipedia

Unread post by Earthy Astringent » Sun Aug 04, 2019 4:46 am

DanMurphy wrote:Fairly explicit propaganda outfit with some creepy ties to the Assad government in Syria (and this has been public knowledge since at least 2013). So on the one hand, good call.

But on the other, pathetic that it was being used on their website to back up statements of fact for so long.
Still, having such a small subset of people making such a decision that effects everyone is not ideal. Then when people challenge a decision the peepul scream “but consensus!!!!”

A consensus from a small sample is not a consensus at all.

User avatar
DanMurphy
Habitué
Posts: 3136
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:58 pm
Wikipedia User: Dan Murphy
Wikipedia Review Member: DanMurphy

Re: MintPress blacklisted on Wikipedia

Unread post by DanMurphy » Sun Aug 04, 2019 5:41 am

Earthy Astringent wrote:
DanMurphy wrote:Fairly explicit propaganda outfit with some creepy ties to the Assad government in Syria (and this has been public knowledge since at least 2013). So on the one hand, good call.

But on the other, pathetic that it was being used on their website to back up statements of fact for so long.
Still, having such a small subset of people making such a decision that effects everyone is not ideal. Then when people challenge a decision the peepul scream “but consensus!!!!”

A consensus from a small sample is not a consensus at all.
Shit. In professional organizations with much higher accountability stakes, these kinds of decisions are often made by a committee of one. And it works much better.

User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way
Contact:

Re: MintPress blacklisted on Wikipedia

Unread post by Poetlister » Sun Aug 04, 2019 10:26 am

DanMurphy wrote:
Earthy Astringent wrote:A consensus from a small sample is not a consensus at all.
Shit. In professional organizations with much higher accountability stakes, these kinds of decisions are often made by a committee of one. And it works much better.
Yes, but the one person is rather more likely to be someone who is well-informed and competent. If there's an obscure discussion with most of the participants being people canvassed by the person who started the discussion, the result will be pretty biased.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

User avatar
Bezdomni
Habitué
Posts: 2935
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 9:07 pm
Wikipedia User: RosasHills
Location: Monster Vainglory ON (.. party HQ ..)
Contact:

Re: MintPress blacklisted on Wikipedia

Unread post by Bezdomni » Wed Aug 07, 2019 9:53 pm

MintPress responds, naming names and reminding people of a little wiki-history.
los auberginos

User avatar
mendaliv
Habitué
Posts: 1343
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:35 pm
Wikipedia User: mendaliv

Re: MintPress blacklisted on Wikipedia

Unread post by mendaliv » Wed Aug 07, 2019 9:58 pm

Bezdomni wrote:MintPress responds, naming names and reminding people of a little wiki-history.
Of the Wikipedia editors who voted to discredit MintPress, several were self-listed as experts in video games, computer science and anime, not geopolitical events
That is a SICK burn. :XD
“It is a fair summary of history to say that the safeguards of liberty have frequently been forged in controversies involving not very nice people.” United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56, 68, 69 (1950) (Frankfurter, J. dissenting).

User avatar
Zoloft
Trustee
Posts: 13984
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:54 pm
Wikipedia User: Stanistani
Wikipedia Review Member: Zoloft
Actual Name: William Burns
Nom de plume: William Burns
Location: San Diego
Contact:

Re: MintPress blacklisted on Wikipedia

Unread post by Zoloft » Thu Aug 08, 2019 1:21 am

I feel a bit dirty reading that. MintPress has a loose grip on the facts.

My avatar is sometimes indicative of my mood:
  • Actual mug ◄
  • Uncle Cornpone
  • Zoloft bouncy pill-thing


User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way
Contact:

Re: MintPress blacklisted on Wikipedia

Unread post by Poetlister » Thu Aug 08, 2019 12:18 pm

Bezdomni wrote:MintPress responds, naming names and reminding people of a little wiki-history.
I think I'd already linked that in my opening post.
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

User avatar
Poetlister
Genius
Posts: 25599
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:15 pm
Nom de plume: Poetlister
Location: London, living in a similar way
Contact:

Re: MintPress blacklisted on Wikipedia

Unread post by Poetlister » Thu Aug 08, 2019 12:19 pm

Zoloft wrote:MintPress has a loose grip on the facts.
Yes, that's precisely why it can't be recognised as a reliable source!
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly" - Nietzsche

Post Reply