Wikipedia’s culture of sexism – it's not just for novelists.
- Hersch
- Retired
- Posts: 3719
- kołdry
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:09 am
- Wikipedia User: Herschelkrustofsky
- Wikipedia Review Member: Herschelkrustofsky
Wikipedia’s culture of sexism – it's not just for novelists.
“If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.”
Malcolm X
Malcolm X
- DanMurphy
- Habitué
- Posts: 3153
- Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:58 pm
- Wikipedia User: Dan Murphy
- Wikipedia Review Member: DanMurphy
Re: Wikipedia’s culture of sexism – it's not just for noveli
Nice work. I also really like the first two subheads.
It looks as if the first sentence after the second pull-quote should be within the pull-quote.
It looks as if the first sentence after the second pull-quote should be within the pull-quote.
- HRIP7
- Denizen
- Posts: 6953
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:05 am
- Wikipedia User: Jayen466
- Wikipedia Review Member: HRIP7
- Actual Name: Andreas Kolbe
- Location: UK
Re: Wikipedia’s culture of sexism – it's not just for noveli
Fixed. Have also added Qworty's rant from Salon, and a Gleick reference in the last paragraph.DanMurphy wrote:Nice work. I also really like the first two subheads.
It looks as if the first sentence after the second pull-quote should be within the pull-quote.
Re: Wikipedia’s culture of sexism – it's not just for noveli
We've hastened the departure of "GWickwire" from the 'pedia, can we now get Qworty to go? That guy is a real piece of work.
-
- Retired
- Posts: 4130
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:40 pm
- Wikipedia User: Scott
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Wikipedia’s culture of sexism – it's not just for noveli
Great post.
My question, to this esteemed Wiki community, is this: Do you think that a Wiki could successfully generate a useful encyclopedia? -- JimboWales
Yes, but in the end it wouldn't be an encyclopedia. It would be a wiki. -- WardCunningham (Jan 2001)
Yes, but in the end it wouldn't be an encyclopedia. It would be a wiki. -- WardCunningham (Jan 2001)
Re: Wikipedia’s culture of sexism – it's not just for noveli
I presume that this was posted now for the old "strike while the iron is hot" reasons, but it's unfortunate that the mattbuck exposé will probably get fewer eyes on it now. Any thoughts to yanking that and rerunning next week?
"The world needs bad men. We keep the other bad men from the door."
- Tippi Hadron
- Queen
- Posts: 933
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 5:15 am
- Wikipedia User: DracoEssentialis
- Actual Name: Monika Nathalie Collida Kolbe
Re: Wikipedia’s culture of sexism – it's not just for noveli
That is what we're planning on doing. Things just got a bit mixed up in the writers' room. :)Tarc wrote:I presume that this was posted now for the old "strike while the iron is hot" reasons, but it's unfortunate that the mattbuck exposé will probably get fewer eyes on it now. Any thoughts to yanking that and rerunning next week?
In the meantime, the piece on Wikipedia Commons administrator Matt Buck's attitude towards child pornography will be tweeted and mailed to all the right people.
Re: Wikipedia’s culture of sexism – it's not just for noveli
If by that you mean his university, his peers etc.... Go ahead.
- SB_Johnny
- Habitué
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:26 am
- Wikipedia User: SB_Johnny
- Wikipedia Review Member: SB_Johnny
Re: Wikipedia’s culture of sexism – it's not just for noveli
For the convenience of our visitors, this topic is also being discussed on another thread here.
This is not a signature.✌
- HRIP7
- Denizen
- Posts: 6953
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:05 am
- Wikipedia User: Jayen466
- Wikipedia Review Member: HRIP7
- Actual Name: Andreas Kolbe
- Location: UK
Re: Wikipedia’s culture of sexism – it's not just for noveli
Mod. note: Off-topic posts on Rush Limbaugh etc. now that-a-way.