Chris Rogers, BBC journalist

For discussions on privacy implications, including BLP issues
User avatar
HRIP7
Denizen
Posts: 6953
kołdry
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:05 am
Wikipedia User: Jayen466
Wikipedia Review Member: HRIP7
Actual Name: Andreas Kolbe
Location: UK

Chris Rogers, BBC journalist

Unread post by HRIP7 » Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:37 pm

There is an argument over the article Chris Rogers (journalist) (T-H-L).

Legal threats have been made, defamation has been alleged, puffery has been alleged, and BBC IP addresses are apparently involved.

Suspicions are rife on Jimbo's talk page.

User avatar
thekohser
Majordomo
Posts: 13406
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 5:07 pm
Wikipedia User: Thekohser
Wikipedia Review Member: thekohser
Actual Name: Gregory Kohs
Location: United States
Contact:

Re: Chris Rogers, BBC journalist

Unread post by thekohser » Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:37 pm

It's a good thing Wikipedia is the encyclopedia "anyone can edit" -- it makes for such a stable and professional publication.
"...making nonsensical connections and culminating in feigned surprise, since 2006..."

User avatar
rhindle
Habitué
Posts: 1448
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 7:44 pm
Wikipedia User: Kafkaesque
Wikipedia Review Member: rhindle
Location: 'Murica

Re: Chris Rogers, BBC journalist

Unread post by rhindle » Thu Jun 21, 2012 4:58 pm

Deleted by Uncle G concluding the article was an advertisement and copyvio.

EricBarbour
 
Posts: 10891
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:32 pm
Location: hell

Re: Chris Rogers, BBC journalist

Unread post by EricBarbour » Thu Jun 21, 2012 8:36 pm

And as usual, the badly-spelled "legal threat" was oversighted, and Uncle G recreated the article as a useless stub.
All of the original edit history is now gone. All of the contribs of the editors involved, positive or hostile, are now gone.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Co ... rogersbwtv
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Co ... johnrogers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Co ... ions/Bandw
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Co ... 54.232.226

The BLP noticeboard and Jimbo talkpage discussion is all that remains of the argument.

Yet again, Wikipedia rewrites its own history, and pretends it didn't happen.

Post Reply