Wikipediocracy

Michaeldsuarez wrote:Wkipedia's "Barbara Lerner Spectre" article has an unsourced "controversy" section. The only people who believe that there's a controversy are white nationalists (e.g. the people running Metapedia). Even if sources exist, it's the opinion of a fringe group and shouldn't included. The "Controversy" section of the article, as well as the "In 2010 ..." paragraph, should be removed.

P.S. Metapedia's article on Barbara Spectre was created by "Basileus", who writes hit pieces on Metapedia, including articles on eleven Wikipedians. What do we know about "Basileus"? Was he or she a former Wikipedian? What motivated him or her into creating articles on so many Wikipedians?

Michaeldsuarez wrote:.

P.S. Metapedia's article on Barbara Spectre was created by "Basileus", who writes hit pieces on Metapedia, including articles on eleven Wikipedians. What do we know about "Basileus"? Was he or she a former Wikipedian? What motivated him or her into creating articles on so many Wikipedians?

Lukeno94 wrote:Sorted.

enwikibadscience wrote:And briefly socking as JeffLB (T-C-L)?

Michaeldsuarez wrote:I think that Basileus might've been Yorkshirian (T-C-L). Compare the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_National_Party&diff=349678146&oldid=349677145 (March 13, 2010)

http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=British_National_Party&diff=68011&oldid=65170 (March 20, 2010)

Basileus didn't copy the March 20, 2010 version of the article to Metapedia, so he or she must've been aware of the edit warring that occurred several days earlier. Of the participants in the edit war, Yorkshirian seems to be the most promising suspect. The "Basileus" account on Metapedia was created a day after Yorkshirian was banned from Wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User%3AYorkshirian&type=block

http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=newusers&page=User%3ABasileus

Michaeldsuarez wrote:

enwikibadscience wrote:And briefly socking as JeffLB (T-C-L)?

Besides some shared interest in certain topics, I don't see any connection between JeffLB and Basileus.

Michaeldsuarez wrote:

Michaeldsuarez wrote:I think that Basileus might've been Yorkshirian (T-C-L). Compare the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_National_Party&diff=349678146&oldid=349677145 (March 13, 2010)

http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=British_National_Party&diff=68011&oldid=65170 (March 20, 2010)

The "Basileus" account on Metapedia was created a day after Yorkshirian was banned from Wikipedia:

culeaker wrote:Am I the only person who finds the idea of an ED admin worrying about BLP violations to be totally surreal?

Zoloft wrote:

culeaker wrote:Am I the only person who finds the idea of an ED admin worrying about BLP violations to be totally surreal?

Wikipediocracy is a big tent.

I put that strange word ''vertified'' into an advanced search on User and Talk. I came up with another user who has contributed to Yorkshire articles. Curiouser and curiouser.--[[User:Harkey Lodger|Harkey Lodger]] ([[User talk:Harkey Lodger|talk]]) 21:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Note the use of the word ''vertified''.

This user is a Hellenophile.

This user is interested in the Byzantine Empire

Lukeno94 wrote:And is constantly re-adding it. Yey.

JeffLB wrote:Here is a note I received from Lukeno94 on Dec. 13, 2013 about my adding the quote from BLS from the Israel Broadcasting Authority video, The Jews of Sweden: "This is your last warning. The next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Barbara Lerner Spectre, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Lukeno94" Firstly, I documented that BLS said those words on the Israel Broadcasting Authority video, The Jews of Sweden. Secondly, if you Google BLS you will find most of the first pages results allude to this quote. How is it defamatory to accurately quote someone about something they said that is generating a lot or most of the current interest in her? What am I missing? Or what is Lukeno94 missing? [[User:JeffLB|JeffLB]] ([[User talk:JeffLB|talk]]) 17:54, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

culeaker wrote:Am I the only person who finds the idea of an ED admin worrying about BLP violations to be totally surreal?

Michaeldsuarez wrote:Here's the new Encyclopedia Dramatica article on "Basileus" / "Yorkshirian".

He began his political life in Chicago as a cheerleader for the totalitarian Stalinist regime of Enver Hoxha in Albania, with the Chicago Area Friends of Albania. He has an obsession with fellow communist Lyndon LaRouche.

== Barbara Lerner Spectre quote from Israel Broadcasting Authority video ==

[Anti-Semitic bullshit]

Hasbara patrols? http://wikispooks.com/wiki/Wikipedia%27s_Hasbara <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/50.136.53.238|50.136.53.238]] ([[User talk:50.136.53.238|talk]]) 00:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Michaeldsuarez wrote:Oh, wow, WikiSpooks:

https://wikispooks.com/wiki/The_Holocaust

https://wikispooks.com/wiki/9/11:Israel_did_it

I'm going to have to create an ED article about that place. It's apparently owned by someone called "Peter Presland".

Michaeldsuarez wrote:Oh, wow, WikiSpooks:

EricBarbour wrote:Ahem:
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Morag_Kerr#Soixante-neuf

EricBarbour wrote:

Michaeldsuarez wrote:Oh, wow, WikiSpooks:

Ahem:
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Morag_Kerr#Soixante-neuf

I wrote:When I've spoken to a friend of mine who's a veterinary lecturer... (She also reports that she has been accused of being a sock of Slim Virgin.)

Hannibalcaesar wrote:allegiance=[[White people]], [[culture of Europe]]

This user favors absolute monarchy.

This user supports the restoration of the Tsar and the Russian Empire as a Constitutional Monarchy.

This user is a modern imperialist and believes in the re-establishment of the British Empire.

This was a time when Europe was 100% white. It was decent, noble, and pure.

I like to study this topic from the German point of view.

1882. A whiter, saner Europe

1909. A whiter, saner Europe and America

Michaeldsuarez wrote:... he or she ...

Michaeldsuarez wrote:I hope that the Wikipedians are wise enough to not allow neo-Nazis such as Hannibalcaesar influence the article.

thekohser wrote:

Michaeldsuarez wrote:... he or she ...

As the resident Wikipediocracy sexist, let me fix that for you... it's a "he". Women aren't so disgusting as that.

Lukeno94 wrote:And is constantly re-adding it. Yey.

Michaeldsuarez wrote:All of JeffLB's revisions and comments to enwiki since May 2013 had been connected to that video. He's been at this (and nothing else) for nearly a year. JeffLB is presently a single-purpose, POV-pushing account, and enwiki's moderators ought to treat him as such. JeffLB is obviously a crypto-neo-Nazi; otherwise, he wouldn't be so obsessed with trying to insert information about an obscure video that only neo-Nazis care and complain about into the article.

Michaeldsuarez wrote:Zumoarirodoka recreated the "controversy" section. On the bright side, Zumoarirodoka isn't a rightist and understands the nature of the source he or she is using, but on the downside, he or she is still using that source and has created a section that can easily become what Wikipedia term a "coatrack" for anti-Semitics to abuse.

Michaeldsuarez wrote:P.S. When is someone going to remove the obvious "married her father" vandalism? LeesaaSlipsun has been publishing a bunch of subtle, low-key vandalism across several pages since September 28th, yet the only "person" to do anything about it was a bot.

Nikolas Ojala wrote:Undid revision 712363089 by Brustopher (talk) Why remove such a fine quote?

Nikolas Ojala wrote:No it is not. Anti-semitism refers to the fact that there are [[Semitic people]]. I would accept a claim that [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]], [[Josef Goebbels|Goebbels]] and [[Heinrich Himmler|Himmler]] were anti-semitists. Anti-Zionism refers to the fact that there is a political ideology called as [[Zionism]], comparable to other political ideologies. So, it should be obvious that because being a Semite does not equal being a Zionist, then Anti-Zionism is not an euphemism for Anti-Semitism. If someone misuses these words, that is another issue. ——[[User:Nikolas Ojala|Nikolas Ojala]] ([[User talk:Nikolas Ojala|talk]]) 12:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Nikolas Ojala wrote:*Nationalists have criticized the company about flipping upside-down the original values of the company after the deaths of [[Walt Disney]] and [[Roy O. Disney|Roy Disney]].<ref>{{cite journal |last= Miller |first= Merlin |date= 3 March 2011 |title= Walt Disney and the American Dream |url= http://barnesreview.org/pdf/TBR2011-no2-4-10.pdf |journal= The Barnes Review |publisher= |volume= XVII |issue= 2 |pages= 4–9 |doi= |accessdate=23 April 2014 |quote= The Disney empire is all about money now, and the not-so-subtle subversion of Walt’s world. Its contemporary films, television shows, music productions and merchandise are increasingly abhorrent to a healthy culture.}}</ref>

Nikolas Ojala wrote:QR code: Multiculturalism is rape.*

Nikolas Ojala wrote:Palette New Basics for the year 1972. The dimensions of the case is a n*****.*

Nikolas Ojala wrote:An invader is a person who enters the country across the border illegally.*

Signature:

There is no racism in the fact that we want to preserve our country, our culture and our heritage. And if they use this word to mock and intimidate you, laugh for them. That word does not now mean anything anymore.

-Paul Weston in his speech in Denmark 04/07/2015

Nikolas Ojala wrote:I know that many feel is genuine conservatism that defends capitalism, as it is anyway not even pretend to be some sort of alternative to socialism. But in my opinion, capitalism and socialism lead to essentially the same space, which is the transition of ownership and power over the few. I do not support either of the economic model, and that is why I DISTRIBUTISM. In my opinion it is more genuinely right-wing.

<meta name="description" content="Nikolas Ojalan kotisivu – The WWW homepage of Nikolas Ojala">

Nikolas Ojala wrote:== About few recent edits ==

Although it seems to be [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFE0qAiofMQ a well documented] fact what Barbara Lerner Spectre said in one video interview, [[User:Brustopher|Brustopher]] has repeatedly removed the quote, claiming that "[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =712368863 The whole thing is sourced to a book by a fringe nutter that's why]" and also insulting an other fellow wiki editor saying that his "[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =712835918 contribution history is stereotypically hilarious]". I don't need to touch the ''possible fringe nuttery'' of a book author, because the quote is a widely documented fact. It is just such an (in)famous quote that it could be found on at least that one book, written by a "''fringe nutter''" as [[User:Brustopher|Brustopher]] calls him. Even if you got Youtube somehow wipe out all those video clips, there are many copies on other sites. If [[User:Brustopher|Brustopher]] or anyone keeps doing such deletions, I would call that vandalism. Until now, we could say that [[User:Brustopher|Brustopher]] did not know about the wide documentation, but the other possible explanation could be that [[User:Brustopher|Brustopher]] was motivated by a political agenda. I don't wish to see any kind of deletion vandalism and expect good will. I am sure that also the long time experienced wiki editor [[User:Brustopher|Brustopher]] understands this. ––[[User:Nikolas Ojala|Nikolas Ojala]] ([[User talk:Nikolas Ojala|talk]]) 23:49, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

AlbertAndTheLion wrote:Why are we not told that Israel has been accused of using gas weapons?

Michaeldsuarez wrote:

AlbertAndTheLion wrote:Why are we not told that Israel has been accused of using gas weapons?