Giano reported for 3RR violation

[chad100]

link Giano (T-C-L) reported by Geo Swan (T-C-L)
Page: Harriet Arbuthnot (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Giano (talk · contribs · logs · edit filter log · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [43]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

16:06, 2020 May 22
16:36, 2020 May 22
03:21, 2020 May 23
14:52, 2020 May 23‎
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: 23:04, 2020 May 22

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: 13:26, 2020 May 23

Comments:
I think the original unsigned and undated request the article go without an infobox was exceptional, that it required an explanation, required a signature, and should have been dated.

In his or her last comment, on the talk page, Giano seems to be asserting that I should have recognized that he or she was "the principal editor of this page", and that I should have deferred to them on that account. I think that is the opposite of what WP:OWN recommends. Geo Swan (talk) 20:48, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[/quote]

[el84]

Ugh, infoboxes.

[Poetlister]

Giano is indestructible. This will blow over very rapidly,

[Beeblebrox]

It's a mystery to me why he is still allowed to edit. He's such an abrasive jerk. I expect if someone could formulate a compelling arbcom case it would not go his way. He's been so consistently nasty and condescending for so long, there's got to be enough evidence.

Obviously I would absolutely have to recuse from any such case as we really, really don't get along. Maybe you can tell that from the above remark.

[Poetlister]

It's a mystery to me why he is still allowed to edit. He's such an abrasive jerk. I expect if someone could formulate a compelling arbcom case it would not go his way. He's been so consistently nasty and condescending for so long, there's got to be enough evidence.

Obviously I would absolutely have to recuse from any such case as we really, really don't get along. Maybe you can tell that from the above remark.

I assumed that that was what every Arb thought about most editors. Seriously, there is no shortage of abrasive jerks. Getting rid of a few dozen would improve things a bit. Every Arb should start an alternate account (telling the other Arbs of course) and play at being a newbie, and you'll soon see what I mean.

[The Garbage Scow]

It's a mystery to me why he is still allowed to edit. He's such an abrasive jerk. I expect if someone could formulate a compelling arbcom case it would not go his way. He's been so consistently nasty and condescending for so long, there's got to be enough evidence.

Obviously I would absolutely have to recuse from any such case as we really, really don't get along. Maybe you can tell that from the above remark.

I was really amused when he ran for arbcom years ago. I have to admit, I was rooting for him.

[Poetlister]

I was really amused when he ran for arbcom years ago. I have to admit, I was rooting for him.

It would have been a Heaven-sent gift to the "hasten the day" crowd.