Outing deceased Wikipedia editors
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 3179
- kołdry
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 5:13 pm
Outing deceased Wikipedia editors
When a well-known Wikipedia editor dies there is often a recognition of their death with no connection to their real life. I find that odd, because while being a Wikipedia editor may have been a part of their life, it was (hopefully) only a small part. Occasionally users here will "out" a Wikipedia editor by posting their real life identity to add context to things under discussion. I don't think we do it gratuitously, but I'm sure other people might feel differently about that, especially if they are the ones being outed.
I guess I started thinking about this when I saw the Signpost note about the passing of Eagleash (T-C-L) without giving their real name. The very recent death of Nosebagbear (T-C-L) reminded me.
So, is it acceptable or desirable to post the identities of deceased Wikipedia editors in the even of their death? Is it better to just know them as characters on a screen? What are the pros and cons? I think it reminds people that they were a living, feeling, human being, but I would like to hear some other opinions.
I guess I started thinking about this when I saw the Signpost note about the passing of Eagleash (T-C-L) without giving their real name. The very recent death of Nosebagbear (T-C-L) reminded me.
So, is it acceptable or desirable to post the identities of deceased Wikipedia editors in the even of their death? Is it better to just know them as characters on a screen? What are the pros and cons? I think it reminds people that they were a living, feeling, human being, but I would like to hear some other opinions.
-
- Muted
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2022 10:01 pm
- Wikipedia User: casualdejekyll
Re: Outing deceased Wikipedia editors
I think it really depends on the specific editor and the wishes of their family.
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1451
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 7:44 pm
- Wikipedia User: Kafkaesque
- Wikipedia Review Member: rhindle
- Location: 'Murica
Re: Outing deceased Wikipedia editors
I do not think outing is necessary if their IRL identity was private from everyone. If their IRL was well-known but not totally in the public it may be more reasonable. I personally think outing, or even doxxing, is fair game for those who weaponize their anonymity to abuse the power they have or cause harm (or potential harm) to someone.
-
- Sonny, I've got a whole theme park full of red delights for you.
- Posts: 31894
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:16 pm
- Wikipedia User: Vigilant
- Wikipedia Review Member: Vigilant
Re: Outing deceased Wikipedia editors
rhindle wrote: ↑Sun Sep 03, 2023 4:14 pmI do not think outing is necessary if their IRL identity was private from everyone. If their IRL was well-known but not totally in the public it may be more reasonable. I personally think outing, or even doxxing, is fair game for those who weaponize their anonymity to abuse the power they have or cause harm (or potential harm) to someone.
Hello, John. John, hello. You're the one soul I would come up here to collect myself.
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1049
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2021 2:00 am
- Wikipedia User: Hemiauchenia
Re: Outing deceased Wikipedia editors
I think there's a public obituary out there that mentions their Wikipedia editing and alias (e.g. SlimVirgin), then it's a bit absurd to enforce restricting the mention of that identity on Wikipedia, I even got oversighted for adding mention of the exact date and cause of her death (COPD), despite not mentioning her real name at all, or even linking to the obit.
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1997
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: Outing deceased Wikipedia editors
That's absurd. But then we know that a sizeable proportion of senior Wikipedia editors have only a tenuous grip on reality.Hemiauchenia wrote: ↑Sun Sep 03, 2023 5:00 pmI think there's a public obituary out there that mentions their Wikipedia editing and alias (e.g. SlimVirgin), then it's a bit absurd to enforce restricting the mention of that identity on Wikipedia, I even got oversighted for adding mention of the exact date and cause of her death (COPD), despite not mentioning her real name at all, or even linking to the obit.
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 3179
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 5:13 pm
Re: Outing deceased Wikipedia editors
I think it is nice to see the fuller picture of a deceased editor by knowing who they were in life, but it appears that I am alone in that view. I will let deceased Wikipedia editors rest in peace and pseudononity.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2022 1:13 pm
- Wikipedia User: ScottishFinnishRadish
- Actual Name: Stephen Root Vegetable
Re: Outing deceased Wikipedia editors
I think time after death is also a consideration. There are some seriously unhinged individuals and the chance of disruption at funeral services is quite a bit higher than it should be. Even if someone was an ass on Wikipedia, their family doesn't deserve online shit leaking over.
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2022 1:05 am
Re: Outing deceased Wikipedia editors
Yes. On the other hand, it may give the relations comfort to realize they were not the dear departed’s only target.ScotFinnRadish wrote: ↑Sun Sep 03, 2023 9:22 pmI think time after death is also a consideration. There are some seriously unhinged individuals and the chance of disruption at funeral services is quite a bit higher than it should be. Even if someone was an ass on Wikipedia, their family doesn't deserve online shit leaking over.
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2022 1:05 am
Re: Outing deceased Wikipedia editors
No, you are not alone, and I’m not even sure we are outnumbered, but the anonophiliacs are winning.Giraffe Stapler wrote: ↑Sun Sep 03, 2023 7:20 pmI think it is nice to see the fuller picture of a deceased editor by knowing who they were in life, but it appears that I am alone in that view. I will let deceased Wikipedia editors rest in peace and pseudononity.
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 2974
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 9:07 pm
- Wikipedia User: RosasHills
- Location: Monster Vainglory ON (.. party HQ ..)
De la pudeur...
It's strange not knowing whether certain anonymice have fallen into the bucket or have just rambled on/off to a WiFi-free zone... e.g. Iridescent... Pudeo (whose days seem outnumbered §)...
los auberginos
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 3179
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 5:13 pm
Re: Outing deceased Wikipedia editors
You know, that's something I hadn't considered and it's a fair point. I don't think either of the 2 people I mentioned are at all controversial, but one never knows which Wikipedia crank may be carrying a grudge.ScotFinnRadish wrote: ↑Sun Sep 03, 2023 9:22 pmI think time after death is also a consideration. There are some seriously unhinged individuals and the chance of disruption at funeral services is quite a bit higher than it should be. Even if someone was an ass on Wikipedia, their family doesn't deserve online shit leaking over.
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 2974
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 9:07 pm
- Wikipedia User: RosasHills
- Location: Monster Vainglory ON (.. party HQ ..)
good news :)
I hadn't logged into en.wp this morning for the good news. §
Now if Pudeo could just show up here later today and say he made a great tidal wave and splashed himself out of the bucket, it'd be a perfect day...
Now if Pudeo could just show up here later today and say he made a great tidal wave and splashed himself out of the bucket, it'd be a perfect day...
los auberginos
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 3876
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:30 pm
- Wikipedia User: Just Step Sideways
- Location: The end of the road, Alaska
Re: Outing deceased Wikipedia editors
I've told my wife that if I die suddenly, I'd appreciate it if she would use my laptop to email ArbCom from my WP email and tell them I died, but I also said I would never know if she did it or not and to do whatever makes her feel better. I used to drive all day for work, in any and all conditions up to and including total whiteouts, tsunamis, regular flooding, moose that sometime just run out in front of you, etc, so I had thought about it a bit. ArbCom and the Foundation know my real nameand could verify.
On the broader issue of severe illness and death: I realized a few years ago how important it is to have these discussions with your loved ones. Both of my parents, for entirely seperate reasons, were in a really bad way at the same time. My dad let me know that they both had living wills, which is a very nice thing you can do for your loved ones so they don't have to wonder or argue about what you might have wanted.
On the broader issue of severe illness and death: I realized a few years ago how important it is to have these discussions with your loved ones. Both of my parents, for entirely seperate reasons, were in a really bad way at the same time. My dad let me know that they both had living wills, which is a very nice thing you can do for your loved ones so they don't have to wonder or argue about what you might have wanted.
information is not knowledge, knowledge is not wisdom
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 4816
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 7:19 pm
Re: good news :)
I've been wondering about Pudeo for months. He last checked in here December 2021. I also wonder about TungstenCarbide and Everyking (T-C-L).
-
- Muted
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2022 10:01 pm
- Wikipedia User: casualdejekyll
Re: Outing deceased Wikipedia editors
So your real name ISN'T "Beeblebrox"?Beeblebrox wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 5:21 pmArbCom and the Foundation know my real name and could verify.
-
- the Merciless
- Posts: 3002
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 1:35 pm
Re: Outing deceased Wikipedia editors
He's just zist guy....casualdejekyll wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 8:32 pmSo your real name ISN'T "Beeblebrox"?Beeblebrox wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 5:21 pmArbCom and the Foundation know my real name and could verify.
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 7:04 pm
Re: Outing deceased Wikipedia editors
While editing Wikipedia is something I enjoy and spend time doing, I can't imagine I would ever stipulate to a loved one "hey you should let these internet randos know I kicked the bucket". There's definitely a range of how involved editors are on Wikipedia and how many legitimate friends they have through it, though.
Six months since they last edited? Man, I guess that's one reason I'm amazed as many deceased Wikipedians get picked up on. Someone can disappear for half the year and I'd never notice.
-
- Trustee
- Posts: 14122
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:54 pm
- Wikipedia User: Stanistani
- Wikipedia Review Member: Zoloft
- Actual Name: William Burns
- Nom de plume: William Burns
- Location: San Diego
Re: good news :)
*just got an email from Iri saying they’re fine, just “insanely busy”, and that they’ll post here in a while when they get a chance and can find their login info. —[[User:Floquenbeam|Floquenbeam]] ([[User talk:Floquenbeam|talk]]) 02:24, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
My avatar is sometimes indicative of my mood:
- Actual mug ◄
- Uncle Cornpone
- Zoloft bouncy pill-thing
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1049
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2021 2:00 am
- Wikipedia User: Hemiauchenia
Re: Outing deceased Wikipedia editors
I've often wondered if longtime editor WolfmanSF (T-C-L) is dead. He's probably not a familiar name to anyone else on this forum, due to him not frequenting main community spaces, but he was a long time prolific contributor on zoology/paleontology and physics related topics with over 156,000 edits since his account creation in 2006. He suddenly stopped editing in September 2020, despite having pretty consistently edited Wikipedia every month since his account creation in July 2006. https://xtools.wmcloud.org/ec/en.wikipe ... /WolfmanSF
-
- Trustee
- Posts: 14122
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:54 pm
- Wikipedia User: Stanistani
- Wikipedia Review Member: Zoloft
- Actual Name: William Burns
- Nom de plume: William Burns
- Location: San Diego
Re: Outing deceased Wikipedia editors
Well, we did have a plague. Maybe it's time for the WMF to have a 'bring out your dead' drive.
My avatar is sometimes indicative of my mood:
- Actual mug ◄
- Uncle Cornpone
- Zoloft bouncy pill-thing
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1754
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 4:00 am
- Wikipedia User: The Master
Re: Outing deceased Wikipedia editors
Also a prolific photographer. His Commons uploads stop around the same time.Hemiauchenia wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 7:24 pmI've often wondered if longtime editor WolfmanSF (T-C-L) is dead. He's probably not a familiar name to anyone else on this forum, due to him not frequenting main community spaces, but he was a long time prolific contributor on zoology/paleontology and physics related topics with over 156,000 edits since his account creation in 2006. He suddenly stopped editing in September 2020, despite having pretty consistently edited Wikipedia every month since his account creation in July 2006. https://xtools.wmcloud.org/ec/en.wikipe ... /WolfmanSF
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1992
- Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2017 4:13 pm
- Wikipedia User: wbm1058
Re: good news :)
No coffee? OK, then maybe just a little appreciation for my work out here?
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2022 1:05 am
Re: Outing deceased Wikipedia editors
The last wikibituary I saw showed that the undearly departed had, among other things, edited his own son’s article. That kinda stuff is worth noting, even if it’s years late.
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 4816
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 7:19 pm
-
- Habitué
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2022 1:05 am
Re: Outing deceased Wikipedia editors
Looking at it again, I discovered that the dead guy’s ex-wife was a spook (the son is now podcasting about that) so maybe the bahstid had reasons for anonymity.The Blue Newt wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2023 11:44 pmThe last wikibituary I saw showed that the undearly departed had, among other things, edited his own son’s article. That kinda stuff is worth noting, even if it’s years late.