Wikipediocracy

This seems to have quite a lot of layers to it and I haven't looked at the whole story yet. But if the controversy here is just that a user was banned out of nowhere, without any public explanation, I don't know why this is controversial in and of itself. Many users have been banned "out of the blue...

Also Mitch McConnell: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =780593512

He's up for adminship now: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Happy Attack Dog (T-H-L). Surprise, surprise, it's going downhill fast.

It looks like we're on track for another No admin September, given that the last RFA was closed on August 30 of this year. No activity since.

http://web.archive.org/web/201209270504 ... llaume2303
Worth a look. Certainly looks a lot like Randykitty's userpage.

Am I the only one who here who actually still edits Wikipedia? I'm looking you guys up and it looks like most of you are blocked or banned.

You aren't the first person to propose that, BullRangifer is. However, if you go on his YouTube channel you can see what his real name is, and it would seem not to be Mike Adams. Also, looking at his comments it is clear he is the same person as Michael0156 on Wikipedia, particularly because he seem...

He's still active. I know this because after Michael0156 (T-C-L) got blocked indefinitely for disrupting the NaturalNews (T-H-L) article, QuackGuru, whoever he is, then posted on his talk page about how poor Michael had actually edited "according to Wikipedia policies".

Hi, this is Jinkinson, the guy who created this article. I would like to be the first to say that the article, when I created it, was pretty lousy and very much not in line with the way Wikipedia articles are supposed to be structured. But it is much better now, thanks to Jytdog, Arc de Ciel, and al...