Wikipediocracy

Perhaps "Gaslighting" works well too. There was a notable case of this during the LB fiasco, where one of her "fans" made innocuous edits to articles which were of personal importance to LB, but that she was not linked to on-wiki, as a way of saying "I know who you are". On the Town forums where I ...

Poetlister wrote:

Bezdomni wrote:I really wish you could just like posts here instead of having to figure out something clever to say about why you like a post.

You can just quote a small portion of it and then use the emoticon. Don't qiuote the whole of it if it's lengthy, the way that some people do.

As someone who does this kind of stuff for a living: The minutes of a meeting are confirmed and signed at the next meeting, usually as the first item of business. When they are confirmed and signed (literally, the Chair of the Committee initials each page and then signs the back of the minutes) they...

I got an email too.

I hate having to think of new passwords I will never remember

Peter Damian wrote:There is a further error in the Wikipedia article on Vorilong, such as it is. Vorilong died in 1464, the Wikipedia article says 1643. The error has been copied all over the net now.

Fixed

I watched the coverage on the BBC last night. Current politicians were coming out with phrases like "great stateswoman" blah blah blah Politicians from her day who are no longer relevant would say things like "divisive, destroyed industry, took no prisoners" etc etc Then they went to small coal mini...

See:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Chanology

https://whyweprotest.net/community/