Search found 87 matches
- Thu Apr 28, 2022 1:31 am
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Editors with sub-par English skills on English Wikipedia: Getting Worse?
- Replies: 41
- Views: 2121
Re: Editors with sub-par English skills on English Wikipedia: Getting Worse?
The text, quoted in the OP, is rather clearly resting on this - i.e. the gibberish added by User:Telex80 , and subsequently removed by a ( now blocked for 1 month) IP-user, whom likely is same as WPO-User "zz99" . (Note: I'm going to ignore the whiny derailing smoke about being xenophobic and other ...
- Fri Apr 10, 2020 7:52 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: DeltaQuad running for bureaucratship
- Replies: 86
- Views: 15192
Re: DeltaQuad running for bureaucratship
Oh, I failed mindreading, but did do well in firearms.Poetlister wrote: ↑Fri Apr 10, 2020 10:03 amDexterPointy wrote: ↑Thu Apr 09, 2020 10:39 pmEhh? - like saying there's not much water on planet Earth, except for the oceans.
I was replying to this:
...
- Thu Apr 09, 2020 10:39 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: DeltaQuad running for bureaucratship
- Replies: 86
- Views: 15192
Re: DeltaQuad running for bureaucratship
Ehh? - like saying there's not much water on planet Earth, except for the oceans.
- Thu Apr 09, 2020 8:51 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: "You are lazy!", said the Bot to the other Bot.
- Replies: 7
- Views: 448
Re: "You are lazy!", said the Bot to the other Bot.
Ron was notified. The notification was...wait for it... archived by a bot. No. Not yet archived: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ronhjones&oldid=949900431#Pending_suspension_of_administrative_permissions_due_to_inactivity But it will be soon, in reading that "All threads on thi...
- Thu Apr 09, 2020 5:25 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: "You are lazy!", said the Bot to the other Bot.
- Replies: 7
- Views: 448
Re: "You are lazy!", said the Bot to the other Bot.
Let's assume good faith, and not jump to conclusions: Maybe one of the Bots was hammered?Poetlister wrote: ↑Thu Apr 09, 2020 4:24 pmClearly, JJMC89 bot (T-C-L) is being misused, poor thing.
- Thu Apr 09, 2020 5:13 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Bbb23 chastised by Arbcom, quits Wikipedia (on April Fool's Day)
- Replies: 306
- Views: 26466
Re: Bbb23 chastised by Arbcom, quits Wikipedia (on April Fool's Day)
Well, the 21.Jan.2012 created "H Debussy-Jones" account, has never been used for anything at all, so one guess might be that BMK did that account-creation to prevent it from ever be re-animated & used by anyone else.
- Thu Apr 09, 2020 5:02 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: DeltaQuad running for bureaucratship
- Replies: 86
- Views: 15192
Re: DeltaQuad running for bureaucratship
Yeah, the Ombuds Commission election in Jan.2020, is weird concerning DeltaQuad. I found that: 20.Oct.2019 : Completely self-resigning all powers - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bureaucrats%27_noticeboard&oldid=922479544#Desysop_(DeltaQuad) - https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index...
- Thu Apr 09, 2020 3:21 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: DeltaQuad running for bureaucratship
- Replies: 86
- Views: 15192
Re: DeltaQuad running for bureaucratship
Looking at this posting from 21.Oct.2019, then: Nope.Giraffe Stapler wrote: ↑Thu Apr 09, 2020 2:58 pmDeltaQuad is a she. Has been for a while now.DexterPointy wrote: ↑Thu Apr 09, 2020 2:03 pmWhat seems to have gone unnoticed in this thread, is that DeltaQuad had his CheckUser and Oversight permissions restored on 8.Feb.2020.
He got his permissions back by a request to ArbCom.
- Thu Apr 09, 2020 2:03 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: DeltaQuad running for bureaucratship
- Replies: 86
- Views: 15192
Re: DeltaQuad running for bureaucratship
What seems to have gone unnoticed in this thread, is that DeltaQuad had his CheckUser and Oversight permissions restored on 8.Feb.2020.
He got his permissions back by a request to ArbCom.
He got his permissions back by a request to ArbCom.
- Thu Apr 09, 2020 1:05 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: "You are lazy!", said the Bot to the other Bot.
- Replies: 7
- Views: 448
"You are lazy!", said the Bot to the other Bot.
Bot warning Bot about inactivity: Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity I think RonBot's inactivity is excusable, because RonBot was blocked for being a security risk . :fan: :banana: :dalek: Note: Both RonBot and Ronhjones (owner of RonBot) are currently up for Admin-st...
- Thu Apr 09, 2020 12:51 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Bbb23 chastised by Arbcom, quits Wikipedia (on April Fool's Day)
- Replies: 306
- Views: 26466
Re: Bbb23 chastised by Arbcom, quits Wikipedia (on April Fool's Day)
2 quick lookups - 1'st for User:Ed Fitzgerald - 2'nd for User:H Debussy-Jones The 2'nd one is really weird, because "H Debussy-Jones" was renamed to "Between My Ken" on 21.Sep.2011, but then on 21.Jan.2012 (4 months later), the "H Debussy-Jones" account was created. Maybe it's simply because the WP-...
- Wed Apr 08, 2020 12:37 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Bbb23 chastised by Arbcom, quits Wikipedia (on April Fool's Day)
- Replies: 306
- Views: 26466
Re: Bbb23 chastised by Arbcom, quits Wikipedia (on April Fool's Day)
That's a fucking Drama-Queen pseudo-exit by Bbb23: He hasn't turned in his CU or Admin bits, despite a week having passed. And, as Ritchie notes "he's still around removing posts he doesn't like." on his Talk-page , despite there having announced that "I will not be responding to messages posted to ...
- Wed Feb 26, 2020 10:43 pm
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
- Replies: 507
- Views: 299138
Re: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
Finally, GONE! ( Kudpung desysop'ed by 6-2-1 arb ) But, for kind of the wrong reasons: Kudpung has been a patronising arsehole towards everyone for years. - yet gets killed when gender-whiney'ings kick in. You've jumped the gun a little bit, voting still hasn't finished. Nope, because: For this cas...
- Wed Feb 26, 2020 7:37 pm
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
- Replies: 507
- Views: 299138
Re: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
Finally, GONE! (Kudpung desysop'ed by 6-2-1 arb)
But, for kind of the wrong reasons: Kudpung has been a patronising arsehole towards everyone for years. - yet gets killed when gender-whiney'ings kick in.
But, for kind of the wrong reasons: Kudpung has been a patronising arsehole towards everyone for years. - yet gets killed when gender-whiney'ings kick in.
- Fri Feb 07, 2020 9:41 pm
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
- Replies: 507
- Views: 299138
Re: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
I should say, Mr. Buffs has every right to be proud of his military service, which I think all of us (at least those of us in the USA) greatly appreciate. I'm just getting tired of that. I'm not buying. It's a career path and one that offers a highly pensioned, medical-coverage-paid retirement afte...
- Sun Jan 26, 2020 10:31 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: The Portal Carbuncle bursts again (now at Arbcom)
- Replies: 39
- Views: 3652
Re: The Portal Carbuncle bursts again (now at Arbcom)
Expressions about behaviour, isn't same as behaviour.Beeblebrox wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2020 10:00 pmThe case was about behavior around portals, and the committee isn't an investigative body anyway.
- Sun Jan 26, 2020 10:20 pm
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
- Replies: 507
- Views: 299138
Re: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
She shouldn't be on Wikipedia at all. (Who the fuck would eat hazelnuts, knowing they were allergic to hazelnuts.)Moral Hazard wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2020 8:51 pm... Missvain declared that she suffers anxiety whenever somebody discusses her on Wikipedia. She should seek help for her Wikipedia addiction.
- Sun Jan 26, 2020 9:49 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: The Portal Carbuncle bursts again (now at Arbcom)
- Replies: 39
- Views: 3652
Re: The Portal Carbuncle bursts again (now at Arbcom)
If they had bothered spending the time needed to actually examine how NA1000 operates and argues, not just looking at what's been "narrowly" presented in the case, then it'd be clear that NA1000 should be thrown the hell out of WP. What BHG has accused NA1000 of, is pretty darn accurate.
- Tue Jan 21, 2020 1:12 am
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Should the Foundation call itself Wikipedia?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 987
Re: Should the Foundation call itself Wikipedia?
On a side-note: Google went the other way in 2015, forming Alphabet (https://abc.xyz/), letting Google become a subsidiary of Alphabet (as noted e.g. here or there , from Aug 2015) . Renaming WMF (Wiki Media Foundation) to Wikipedia (or Wikipedia Foundation), seem to accomplish little or nothing: Wi...
- Fri Jan 17, 2020 10:41 pm
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
- Replies: 507
- Views: 299138
Re: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
I'd say I did, by using the term "anyone" (found in 6.Sep.2018 posting). Anyone encompasses everyone, as in "anyone, without any exception or exceptions" or as in "everyone, including Jake, not excluding Jake". Hmm... Okay, maybe, but in case I wasn't clear before, I wouldn't include copies of othe...
- Fri Jan 17, 2020 9:46 pm
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
- Replies: 507
- Views: 299138
Re: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
I'd say I did, by using the term "anyone" (found in 6.Sep.2018 posting). Anyone encompasses everyone, as in "anyone, without any exception or exceptions" or as in "everyone, including Jake, not excluding Jake".Midsize Jake wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 9:28 pmWhy not ask me (or one of the other admins/mods here) for copies?
- Fri Jan 17, 2020 9:20 pm
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
- Replies: 507
- Views: 299138
Re: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
Jake , you're now, today , reconsidering your censorship from 16 months ago, thus only now, 16 months late, attempting to tackle some kind of addressing of what I asked 6.Sep.2018 . Well, the interesting thing in that thread, was the conversation with Molly, and that can't simply be revived & conti...
- Fri Jan 17, 2020 9:12 am
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
- Replies: 507
- Views: 299138
Re: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
Note! Don't revive that discussion here, because Jake (wikipediocracy admin) may censor you away, as a reminiscence shows here 4 . I can assure you that the posts I removed in that instance had nothing to do with GW's "order of personal addressing preference," other than the last one, in which you ...
- Thu Jan 16, 2020 11:13 pm
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
- Replies: 507
- Views: 299138
Re: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
... Surely the reason this escalated as it did was due to his improbably absurd reaction to being politely asked in future to refer to her by her username. At some point he offered that he was an old fashioned English guy who believed it was more respectful to refer to woman by their first name. Po...
- Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:05 pm
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
- Replies: 507
- Views: 299138
Re: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
Whatever 1500 word stew Molly is cooking on Chris, it's probably not without bite, or overly sweet. She's already at 1,510 , so I guess she'll need a bigger extension. It's too rambling (said the guy who posts his own rambling posts) - she would do good to tighten it, and she probably can. Chopping...
- Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:57 am
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
- Replies: 507
- Views: 299138
Re: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
Speaking of high profile contributors to the case, then something is coming down the mountain @ "Evidence extension".
Whatever 1500 word stew Molly is cooking on Chris, it's probably not without bite, or overly sweet.
Whatever 1500 word stew Molly is cooking on Chris, it's probably not without bite, or overly sweet.
- Thu Jan 16, 2020 4:07 am
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
- Replies: 507
- Views: 299138
Re: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
Now he's took the whole lot down. Have to say I'm disappointed.... I suspect Mr. Ruban ran into the same problem others have run into when trying to defend Mr. Kudpung: If you quote him in order to convince others of his non-malicious intent, you necessarily have to include the quotes themselves, w...
- Wed Jan 15, 2020 12:38 am
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Crap articles
- Replies: 4422
- Views: 822888
Re: Crap articles
I'm always amused when I see the claims made by cult members that vandalism is usually quickly detected and removed. Take a look at Hadleigh Castle for instance, and see if you can spot what no Wikipedia editor or bot has been able to since that article was vandalised in March last year. My initial...
- Tue Jan 14, 2020 8:52 pm
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
- Replies: 507
- Views: 299138
Re: Note: The rejected BARC proposal did gain a qualified majority.
Look at the stats-table at top in " BARC only has support among non-admins " : The BARC proposal got support from 77% (rounded from 0.7653...) of Editors . Hence it's Administrators, Bureaucrats, and Arbitrators - causing the majority to be "only" 62-38. Therefore, the actual support, when ignoring...
- Tue Jan 14, 2020 12:00 am
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
- Replies: 507
- Views: 299138
Note: The rejected BARC proposal did gain a qualified majority.
Back in the summer of 2015, Kudpung teamed up with his friend Worm That Turned to propose formation of a Bureaucrats' Administrative Review Committee (BARC), which would have established a mechanism outside of Arbcom for the discipline of rogue administrators. The RFC failed of passage by a vote of...
- Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:09 pm
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: Corinna Löckenhoff
- Replies: 20
- Views: 5303
Re: Corinna Löckenhoff
No. Simply claiming infallibility, is insufficient for becoming the Pope: Here's How to Become Pope, explained in just 5 minutes.Moral Hazard wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 7:11 pm... When I claim infallibility, I become the Pope and I speak ex cathedra on matters of faith and morals.
- Mon Jan 13, 2020 6:04 pm
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: Corinna Löckenhoff
- Replies: 20
- Views: 5303
Re: Corinna Löckenhoff
off-topic:
Are you sure you about that? : It doesn't make sense, looking at User:Worm That Turned (there is no "Wormthatturned"; the Ts are capitals in all variations).Moral Hazard wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 2:20 pm... Wormthatturned (T-C-L) once complained that I wrote his name with camel case WormThatTurned. ...
- Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:34 am
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: Corinna Löckenhoff
- Replies: 20
- Views: 5303
Re: Corinna Löckenhoff
Biografer is a sock of Mishae , who is an anti-Semitic and racist person who defended Franzboas , who also was an anti-Semite and racist, and was blocked for asking if Ironholds being upset that Mishae was saying that being blocked was like what the Nazis did was because he was "part Jewish". He al...
- Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:05 am
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
- Replies: 507
- Views: 299138
- Sat Jan 11, 2020 12:30 am
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
- Replies: 507
- Views: 299138
Re: Not so hard to make book really...
That obnoxiously sheepish comment must have been meant to be posted on Wikipedia, not Wikipediocracy.Moral Hazard wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2020 11:37 pm... We do not need to mention specifics, again, a few weeks after Nyb asked us to avoid old business without purpose.
- Fri Jan 10, 2020 10:11 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: The Portal Carbuncle bursts again (now at Arbcom)
- Replies: 39
- Views: 3652
- Fri Jan 10, 2020 9:52 pm
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
- Replies: 507
- Views: 299138
Re: Not so hard to make book really...
... And Kudping ain't walking away with his toolbox if this case actually happens... ... And then he will run another RFA because Kudpung. And that one might stay open for three days. Maybe. You bet on the over/under of three days for that one, with the end result 100% certain. RfB :dramaqueen: Oh,...
- Thu Jan 09, 2020 11:53 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: The Portal Carbuncle bursts again (now at Arbcom)
- Replies: 39
- Views: 3652
Re: The Portal Carbuncle bursts again (now at Arbcom)
That entire workshop is just ass. I felt my brain cells losing the will to live as I tried to read through it. You have brain cells? Yay! Vewy good, Ewic! Supar try! Middle school grade insult, at least, for sure this time! Go back to your pints, you steaming tosspot. :facepalm: Hitting back on "Yo...
- Thu Jan 09, 2020 11:18 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Crap articles
- Replies: 4422
- Views: 822888
Re: Crap articles
It is undoubtedly the case that nearly all of the best articles are written by one person or occasionally two or three. If there is a large number of editors, it's usually because the article is controversial for some reason, often a reason that to most of us here seems absurd. And controversy is a...
- Thu Jan 09, 2020 5:51 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Crap articles
- Replies: 4422
- Views: 822888
Re: Crap articles
Besides, "good articles" would be a separate topic. Obviously, yes! Hmm, Why don't we try locate some actual good articles instead? - and I mean actually good articles, not just some which has been classified as such, by WP. This "Crap articles"-thread listing articles on WP, is a quest similar to ...
- Thu Jan 09, 2020 3:48 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Crap articles
- Replies: 4422
- Views: 822888
Re: Crap articles
Hmm, Why don't we try locate some actual good articles instead?
- and I mean actually good articles, not just some which has been classified as such, by WP.
This "Crap articles"-thread listing articles on WP, is a quest similar to locating dogs in a kennel (doesn't require mastering sleuthing).
- and I mean actually good articles, not just some which has been classified as such, by WP.
This "Crap articles"-thread listing articles on WP, is a quest similar to locating dogs in a kennel (doesn't require mastering sleuthing).
- Wed Jan 08, 2020 5:41 pm
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
- Replies: 507
- Views: 299138
Re: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
... But the fact that it's Guerillero filing the complaint at Arbcom hints that he's really close to getting squished by a truck. Kundpung is perceptive enough to feel the wind of the truck, and having the sense to flee the scene in a timely manner, - thereby avoiding getting hit by said truck. Any...
- Wed Jan 08, 2020 5:05 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: The Portal Carbuncle bursts again (now at Arbcom)
- Replies: 39
- Views: 3652
Re: The Portal Carbuncle bursts again (now at Arbcom)
The Arb.Case is now currently in the "Workshop"-phase, and Northamerica1000 hasn't there made a single posting (in stark contrast to BHG, having supplied a fairly steady stream of comments).
- Wed Jan 08, 2020 4:48 pm
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
- Replies: 507
- Views: 299138
Re: Glorious Kudpung takes on another prominent Wikiwoman
If Kudpung follows his standard MO, then he'll resign as admin for some non-WP-related reason, and subsequently return in a very months, at which point he'll simply request himself getting re-sysop'ed, which will be done as a simple administrative action, since his resignation wasn't under a cloud. ...
- Fri Jan 03, 2020 12:35 am
- Forum: Web 2.0: The Emperor's New Clothes
- Topic: Just Refs - The Naked Wikipedia - beta test
- Replies: 23
- Views: 2980
Re: Just Refs - The Naked Wikipedia - beta test
Just Refs ?
- Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:54 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Crap articles
- Replies: 4422
- Views: 822888
Re: Crap articles
Yet another example. An example showing how WP:CIR is again disregarded, and that even within a topic field which is neither controversial nor popular. From WP:CIR : | What is meant by "Competence is required"? | There is a presumption that people who contribute to the English-language Wikipedia hav...
- Thu Jan 02, 2020 3:26 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Crap articles
- Replies: 4422
- Views: 822888
Re: Crap articles
Let's for the sake of the argument say that we'd write a manifesto - detailing what's wrong, and what's to be done. Now, who's going to execute? Why do we have this site at all? Obviously, it's a relief valve for people who want to moan about how they were treated unfairly on Wikipedia. However, su...
- Wed Jan 01, 2020 12:22 am
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Crap articles
- Replies: 4422
- Views: 822888
Re: Crap articles
I think you misunderstand the point of criticism. It's got nothing to do with manifestos or other political symbolism, it's about telling the truth. And just like with lies, the more you tell the truth the more it is believed. I suspect you misunderstood my use of the word manifest to imply somethi...
- Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:52 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Crap articles
- Replies: 4422
- Views: 822888
Re: Crap articles
... Would it not be more interesting and productive to discuss what it is about Wikipedia and its policies that makes the production of crap articles inevitable? The stupidity of "anyone can edit" is self-evident, but that's just the tip of the iceberg. Let's for the sake of the argument say that w...
- Tue Dec 31, 2019 4:21 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Crap articles
- Replies: 4422
- Views: 822888