Search found 139 matches
- Wed Apr 10, 2024 9:09 pm
- Forum: Blog Posts
- Topic: Nihonjoe Has Been Naughty
- Replies: 818
- Views: 30993
Re: Nihonjoe Has Been Naughty
jc37 doesn't seem to be much aware of crat culture. Aren't the bureaucrats supposed to be boring and risk-averse by nature? The second any of them does anything the least bit controversial it seems they resign the bit (or have it taken away from them). Hell, I'm surprised Primefac still has the bure...
- Tue Apr 09, 2024 10:50 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Barkeep49 RFA
- Replies: 45
- Views: 2660
Re: Barkeep49 RFA
Barkeep has such a distinctive and consistent communication style (and I like that about him) that I don't think he matches any obvious former admins. He strikes me as one of the good ones, even if his ArbCom is "one step forward, two steps back" pretty frequently.
- Sun Apr 07, 2024 9:04 pm
- Forum: Blog Posts
- Topic: Nihonjoe Has Been Naughty
- Replies: 818
- Views: 30993
Re: Nihonjoe Has Been Naughty
I'm appreciating the irony of a dude who exclusively posts multi-paragraph missives accusing someone else of oversharing, so there's that. Back to the topic at hand, Nihonjoe is still one vote away from being desysopped. In the interim, he is still editing although just to action rename requests. Wo...
- Thu Dec 28, 2023 9:21 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: ScottishFinnishRadish goes on a Tban rampage
- Replies: 339
- Views: 16975
Re: ScottishFinnishRadish goes on a Tban rampage
People are over thinking this. SFR just likes banning people. That's it. And if you like banning people you go to where the bans are cheapest - "contentious topics" - where it's easy to manufacture a pretext to indulge your hall-monitor fantasies. It's not like the guy does anything actually useful...
- Thu Dec 28, 2023 9:14 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: ScottishFinnishRadish goes on a Tban rampage
- Replies: 339
- Views: 16975
Re: ScottishFinnishRadish goes on a Tban rampage
People are over thinking this. SFR just likes banning people. That's it. And if you like banning people you go to where the bans are cheapest - "contentious topics" - where it's easy to manufacture a pretext to indulge your hall-monitor fantasies. It's not like the guy does anything actually useful...
- Thu Dec 21, 2023 12:37 am
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Wikipedia's worst sentences
- Replies: 1090
- Views: 617392
Re: Wikipedia's worst sentences
Today's featured article, Sun in fiction (T-H-L), begins with this gem:
The Sun has appeared as a setting in fiction since at least classical antiquity, but for a long time it received relatively sporadic attention.
- Wed Dec 13, 2023 1:49 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Unblockable? Beyond My Ken
- Replies: 20
- Views: 4518
Re: Unblockable? Beyond My Ken
Who cares how insightful he is? Communities die when we tolerate arrogant assholes because they happen to be technically correct.Ritchie333 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 13, 2023 10:10 amI think User:Beyond My Ken/thoughts (T-H-L) is quite insightful, personally.
- Fri Sep 15, 2023 4:51 pm
- Forum: The Money Trail
- Topic: Admins paid to advise clients
- Replies: 35
- Views: 4923
Re: Admins paid to advise clients
But that's something that's really needed — just somebody who has a black belt in notability doctrine and no dog in the fight that can take a quick look at a subject and the potential sourcing and tell the WRITER either "yes, this will fly" or "no, this will not fly, and here is why." It's about a ...
- Thu Sep 14, 2023 10:04 am
- Forum: The Money Trail
- Topic: Admins paid to advise clients
- Replies: 35
- Views: 4923
Re: Admins paid to advise clients
Imagine all the unethical things one could do with the admin toolkit that don't result in "an edit" or "an administrative action" (or whatever the inactivity standard is). Mike Christie raises a hypothetical that amounts to "but what if my boss asks me whether a subject is notable oh no don't desyso...
- Fri May 12, 2023 9:27 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Wikipedia intentionally distorting Holocaust history?
- Replies: 801
- Views: 46456
Re: Wikipedia intentionally distorting Holocaust history?
Wugapodes comes out of this looking like a 1L gunner who just got shut down by the prof. You should make like BU Rob13 and resign.
- Wed Apr 19, 2023 9:44 am
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Jimbo asks Bradv if he encouraged paid editing
- Replies: 137
- Views: 8392
Re: Jimbo asks Bradv if he encouraged paid editing
Smallboner being a shitbag again. The Signpost should just be shutdown at this point. This Smallbones fellow seems to think that "Nobody can reasonably challenge the facts I've presented" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikipedia_Signpost%2FNewsroom&diff=1150605258&old...
- Thu Apr 13, 2023 10:36 am
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Jimbo asks Bradv if he encouraged paid editing
- Replies: 137
- Views: 8392
Re: Jimbo asks Bradv if he encouraged paid editing
Both Jimbo's https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FCase&diff=1149530907&oldid=1149528594,preliminary and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FCase&diff=1149611986&oldid=1149609055&diffmode=source,full statements ref...
- Sun Apr 09, 2023 12:08 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Jimbo asks Bradv if he encouraged paid editing
- Replies: 137
- Views: 8392
Re: Jimbo asks Bradv if he encouraged paid editing
Who will be the first to suggest this is an ADMINACCT-style loss of "trust or confidence of the community"?
- Fri Apr 07, 2023 11:16 am
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Wikipedia intentionally distorting Holocaust history?
- Replies: 801
- Views: 46456
Re: Wikipedia intentionally distorting Holocaust history?
Isn't outing just a side-show to the harassment angle? For about 80 to 90 percent of Wikipedians, no — it's at least one or two levels above that on the "Must Be Punished" scale, always assuming the victim is part of the in-group of course. Hmmm, my logic is this: WHY do we care so much about outin...
- Sat Apr 01, 2023 11:22 am
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Block and unblock of AndewNguyen
- Replies: 102
- Views: 6579
Re: Block and unblock of AndewNguyen
What a https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FCase&diff=prev&oldid=1147654331&diffmode=source,dumb statement from this Dab dude. He encounters "blatant admin overreach" and doesn't think to, y'know, talk to the admin first? Why should this behaviour be okay f...
- Thu Mar 30, 2023 12:05 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Block and unblock of AndewNguyen
- Replies: 102
- Views: 6579
Re: Block and unblock of AndewNguyen
WTT sez that suspending the case for only two weeks would be https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FCase&diff=1147332842&oldid=1147318506&diffmode=source, insufficient period for Dbachmann to reflect and respond. This sort of reasoning just seems like a diffe...
- Tue Mar 28, 2023 8:44 pm
- Forum: Technology
- Topic: A "sound logo"?
- Replies: 27
- Views: 5118
Re: A "sound logo"?
It looks (sounds?) like the winner of the $2500 prize is indeed VQ97, also known as Turn a Couple of Pages, Slam the Book Shut and Play Five Notes on the Marimba, by a Mr. Thaddeus Osborne . Sorry, GX13! Hopefully there's a nice consolation prize for you. We'll probably never hear this again anywhe...
- Thu Mar 23, 2023 4:13 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Discospinster
- Replies: 6
- Views: 713
Re: Discospinster
The problem is that the lesson being learned seems to be, somewhat paradoxically, "all the users who opined that it wasn't vandalism are actually wrong and can be ignored", which I don't think is how "obviousness" is supposed to work whatsoever. It's obvious if and only if everyone reasonable would...
- Wed Mar 22, 2023 10:42 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Wikipedia intentionally distorting Holocaust history?
- Replies: 801
- Views: 46456
Re: Wikipedia intentionally distorting Holocaust history?
Levivich has the motivation and capability to add some incriminating evidence, but he seems to have decided to take a break in the wake of the I-ban SFR imposed on him and VM, shortly after VM garnered yet another sanction in the topic area. This seems to be Lev’s first. He'll just go back to his m...
- Tue Jan 24, 2023 11:11 am
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Crap articles
- Replies: 4422
- Views: 822902
Re: Crap articles
Galton Bridge A “Featured Article”, right up on todays Disgrace o’ the Day, which suggests that mass cast iron is “forged”. The whole article needs a copyedit. The canal proprietors consulted Thomas Telford, the most eminent canal engineer of the day, and he designed a new, straighter route (known ...
- Wed Jan 18, 2023 9:29 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: News from RFA
- Replies: 1034
- Views: 519216
Re: News from RFA
Kudpung needs to be banned from all RfAs. He is never a net positive at these things. That's ironic given who nominated Ritchie's RfF. Ritchie isn't known to be the coolest of characters and he'll throw anyone under a bus if it suits him. I wonder if he's pledged himself to a recall deal. Ritchie i...
- Wed Jan 11, 2023 1:08 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: News from RFA
- Replies: 1034
- Views: 519216
Re: News from RFA
How much behind-the-curtain support are RFA nominators giving their nominees? I agree that MB dug their own grave here, but if I were in their shoes I would have asked the noms to review my answer to Barkeep's Q12 before posting.
- Sat Dec 24, 2022 9:51 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Wikipedia's worst sentences
- Replies: 1090
- Views: 617392
- Thu Dec 22, 2022 2:36 am
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Arbcom Elections 2022: It's that time again
- Replies: 247
- Views: 30334
Re: Arbcom Elections 2022: It's that time again
Slightly surprising to me that Sdrqaz didn't make it; seems like their shorter admin tenure compared to Moneytrees/Guerillero made just enough difference for them to miss. I also wonder if McClennon has just set the all-time record for highest final support % for a candidate who has never been an a...
- Sun Nov 27, 2022 11:30 am
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Arbcom Elections 2022: It's that time again
- Replies: 247
- Views: 30334
Re: Arbcom Elections 2022: It's that time again
I mean, if we've voting based on funniest username, then you gotta give points to WikiBUTTia, the FART encyclopedia (T-C-L)...
- Thu Nov 24, 2022 8:35 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Arbcom Elections 2022: It's that time again
- Replies: 247
- Views: 30334
Re: Arbcom Elections 2022: It's that time again
@RoySmith: You're welcome to post those IRC logs so that the community can assess for itself what I said. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 09:00, 24 November 2022 (UTC) :hmmm: Even though it's a near criminal offense on en.wp to log IRC chats? Making it clearer and clearer with each post th...
- Sat Nov 19, 2022 8:13 pm
- Forum: Non-Wikimedia Wiki Sites
- Topic: Galactica
- Replies: 17
- Views: 5007
Re: Galactica
Yann is getting ratioed and I'm here for it.Giraffe Stapler wrote: ↑Sat Nov 19, 2022 5:47 pmThe "Chief AI Scientist" at Meta tweeted:Yes. Yes, I am.Yann LeCun wrote:Galactica demo is off line for now.
It's no longer possible to have some fun by casually misusing it.
Happy?
- Wed Nov 16, 2022 11:31 am
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Stephen's Last Night in Town
- Replies: 97
- Views: 7358
Re: Athaenara - Schadenfreude and Outrage
For what it's worth, Stephen seems to be https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AArbitration_Committee%2FNoticeboard&type=revision&diff=1122116710&oldid=1122083474,going with the brother defence : ... the harassment wasn't by me, but from someone very close to me. I've been deali...
- Sat Nov 12, 2022 4:30 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Binksternet, FMSky, and "anti-US" music deletionism
- Replies: 65
- Views: 4866
Re: Problems with Binksternet + cultural bias on Wikipedia
If the edits are truly so small and irrelevant, one wonders why you continue to insist on making them.
- Wed Nov 09, 2022 5:25 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Wikipedia's worst sentences
- Replies: 1090
- Views: 617392
Re: Wikipedia's worst sentences
Some ambiguity over at Opioid epidemic : The continued prevalence of the opioid epidemic in the United States can be traced to many reasons. For one, there is a lack of appropriate treatments and treatment centers across the nation. Big cities like New York City are lacking in treatment services and...
- Mon Nov 07, 2022 8:36 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Tamzin blocks Volunteer Marek
- Replies: 129
- Views: 9923
Re: Tamzin blocks Volunteer Marek
I admire OID's candor and their post certainly got Tamzin going in the right direction (we can ignore the latter's bizarre post-hoc no, I totally didn't act emotionally schtick). But it's also clear that ArbCom was always going to decline this. One question is whether OID's strategy is fundamentally...
- Mon Nov 07, 2022 12:14 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Tamzin blocks Volunteer Marek
- Replies: 129
- Views: 9923
Re: Tamzin blocks Volunteer Marek
Even Tamzin agrees that the optics are bad here. This is not doing Tamzin any favors—will be hard to escape the "activist admin" label now.
- Sun Oct 30, 2022 11:04 am
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Athaenara - Schadenfreude and Outrage
- Replies: 762
- Views: 129246
Re: Athaenara - Schadenfreude and Outrage
As usual, nobody comes out of this looking good, whether it's TNT overreacting to just about everything (does nobody go to user talk pages to sort things out before jumping to AN anymore?), Spartaz doubling down when a pretty simple rephrasing would have nipped the whole thing in the bud, or Kudpung...
- Sun Oct 23, 2022 1:05 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Athaenara - Schadenfreude and Outrage
- Replies: 762
- Views: 129246
Re: Athaenara - Schadenfreude and Outrage
Bingo. Wikipedia is no longer a marketplace of ideas, there is an approved way to think, and if you color outside those lines, you will be banned, even if another sanction is more appropriate. The CBAN proposal literally closed as no consensus. So unless you're talking about something else, I don't...
- Thu Oct 20, 2022 12:50 am
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Athaenara - Schadenfreude and Outrage
- Replies: 762
- Views: 129246
Re: Athaenara - Schadenfreude and Outrage
All administrators have ipblock-exempt . I bet there is a large percentage of them that use VPNs or proxies, because who really wants sketchy checkusers sussing out where they live or work. Rules for thee but not for me. Someone named RAN1 has popped up after 8 years of essential inactivity to http...
- Wed Oct 19, 2022 12:55 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Athaenara - Schadenfreude and Outrage
- Replies: 762
- Views: 129246
Re: Athaenara - Schadenfreude and Outrage
Former arb David Fuchs finally putting a stake through the "anyone would have done it" claim: As Jclemens points out, the only out for INVOLVED actions listed is "straightforward cases (e.g., blatant vandalism)". Athaenara's comments do not meet the threshold of vandalism, and if in fact the case w...
- Wed Oct 19, 2022 12:46 am
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Athaenara - Schadenfreude and Outrage
- Replies: 762
- Views: 129246
Re: Athaenara - Schadenfreude and Outrage
Well, the word "homophobia" existed in the 1800s, so even if it meant something different at the time, perhaps Smultronstället can claim some internet points on a technicality :B' Okay, back to the Athaenara fallout. In their evidence, TNT https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitra...
- Tue Oct 18, 2022 1:09 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: My (TheCurrencyGuy) indefinite topic ban
- Replies: 32
- Views: 2410
Re: My (TheCurrencyGuy) indefinite topic ban
I've seen your name come up at ANI before. My cursory take at the time was that this dispute was boring and essentially pointless. If you want to be successful on Wikipedia without getting dragged onto the drama boards, then you will need a finely tuned sense of what hills are worth dying on, and wh...
- Sun Oct 16, 2022 11:34 am
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Athaenara - Schadenfreude and Outrage
- Replies: 762
- Views: 129246
Re: Athaenara - Schadenfreude and Outrage
The ARBCOM case, which TNT insisted on, is replete with irony challenged motherfuckers saying things along the lines of I do not believe that a single bad incident, especially when recognized and understood to be so (and where there is strong possibility it was done in good faith), should disrupt y...
- Tue Aug 09, 2022 4:12 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Arbcom case: Conduct in Deletion Discussions
- Replies: 403
- Views: 39915
Re: Arbcom case: Conduct in Deletion Discussions
I don't really see the problem here. The fact that DS are discretionary militates against a "correctness" standard of review. Who cares if another admin would have handled it differently?
- Mon Aug 01, 2022 8:54 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Arbcom case: Conduct in Deletion Discussions
- Replies: 403
- Views: 39915
Re: Arbcom case: Conduct in Deletion Discussions
Nobody is irreplaceable. Certainly not this "Lugnuts" fellow.
- Sat Aug 31, 2019 11:46 pm
- Forum: The Money Trail
- Topic: 2019 Fundraising banner
- Replies: 16
- Views: 1690
Re: 2019 Fundraising banner
Let's not pillory the chap for his appearance. For all we know, he may be quite nice really. This. Going after someone's appearance 1.) is petty and pointless, and 2.) makes the person doing it look bad. Subjectively 'beautiful' people can be assholes. Subjectively 'ugly' people can be wonderful. A...
- Sat Aug 31, 2019 9:38 pm
- Forum: The Money Trail
- Topic: 2019 Fundraising banner
- Replies: 16
- Views: 1690
Re: 2019 Fundraising banner
Let's not pillory the chap for his appearance. For all we know, he may be quite nice really. This. Going after someone's appearance 1.) is petty and pointless, and 2.) makes the person doing it look bad. Subjectively 'beautiful' people can be assholes. Subjectively 'ugly' people can be wonderful. A...
- Sun Aug 11, 2019 12:01 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Universal code of conduct
- Replies: 217
- Views: 13761
Re: Universal code of conduct
Let's spin up a grant proposal to read all the books in the Library of Babel. Those books contain a wealth of knowledge on underrepresented groups (+1 knowledge equity clout gang) and pay significant attention to not-yet-existent global communities. This all helps position Wikipedia as the knowledge...
- Wed Jul 03, 2019 9:05 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Fram blocked by User:WMFOffice for 1 year
- Replies: 3839
- Views: 209967
Re: Fram blocked by User:WMFOffice for 1 year
None of the other T&S actions were made using the new tactical powers T&S gave themselves, they were global, permanent bans for nutters, paedos, and other such wrong'uns; there is a distinction. I don't believe Brillyle, Kumioko or several others were any of those things. They definitely were not, ...
- Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:01 am
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Fram blocked by User:WMFOffice for 1 year
- Replies: 3839
- Views: 209967
Re: Fram blocked by User:WMFOffice for 1 year
Parts of this are worded weirdly. What is meant by this: This could include funding for training of community members involved in dealing with harassment or helping long term contributors correct behaviors that are inappropriate. We support the provision of the necessary resources to allow the commu...
- Mon Jul 01, 2019 7:54 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Fram blocked by User:WMFOffice for 1 year
- Replies: 3839
- Views: 209967
Re: Fram blocked by User:WMFOffice for 1 year
As the kids say, cringe and bluepilled. One wonders how many valuable contributors any of these Wikipedia chapters has actually recruited.
- Mon Jul 01, 2019 1:38 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Fram blocked by User:WMFOffice for 1 year
- Replies: 3839
- Views: 209967
Re: Fram blocked by User:WMFOffice for 1 year
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Disputed_Signpost_article For some reason they now think that WP:BLP applies to a wiki-only pseudonym. It does. Per WP:BLPTALK: Although this policy applies to posts about Wikipedians in project space , some leeway is permitted to allow the handling of administra...
- Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:56 am
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Fram blocked by User:WMFOffice for 1 year
- Replies: 3839
- Views: 209967
Re: Fram blocked by User:WMFOffice for 1 year
* We want a broad representation of users to engage in deletion debates, but do not want canvassing to skew the list of voters. Was it an accident that Hawkeye7 weighed in to vote to keep the portal? It certainly looks like Hawkeye7 came for a specific reason. He edited only one other MfD discussio...
- Sat Jun 29, 2019 11:32 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Fram blocked by User:WMFOffice for 1 year
- Replies: 3839
- Views: 209967
Re: Fram blocked by User:WMFOffice for 1 year
So NinjaRobotPirate 's AN proposal for GS related to the Fram affair got next to no support and was closed . No surprises there. But I was curious about he and TonyBallioni's use of the word "toxicity" to describe the events of the past weeks ("The above is just a sample of how much this drama is sp...