Search found 37 matches
- Thu Mar 02, 2017 7:58 am
- Forum: News and Media
- Topic: US House of Reps joins the edit war about Garfield's gender
- Replies: 12
- Views: 426
- Tue Feb 28, 2017 9:55 am
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Doxing, Outing or Harassment
- Replies: 157
- Views: 7454
Re: Doxing, Outing or Harassment
Rules don't apply to banned users?
- Wed Nov 25, 2015 7:18 am
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Extraterrestrial Abduction Day
- Replies: 11
- Views: 834
Re: Extraterrestrial Abduction Day
This looks like it's veering offtopic.
- Sun Oct 18, 2015 10:10 pm
- Forum: Web 2.0: The Emperor's New Clothes
- Topic: Amazon sues over 'fake reviews'
- Replies: 8
- Views: 721
Re: Amazon sues over 'fake reviews'
Looks like Amazon is going after review and rating manipulation on their website. Wikipedia could sure use some of that, although I think it would be impossible to get users in court.
- Sat Aug 15, 2015 8:08 am
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: SOFIXIT horror stories
- Replies: 8
- Views: 711
Re: SOFIXIT horror stories
Not entirely related, but years ago I tried to improve an article on Wikipedia and I had no idea how it worked at the time. I added some things and then found, to my horror , that I actually changed the article without an expert coming along! I thought Wikipedia was ran by subject specialists who a...
- Thu Aug 06, 2015 4:47 am
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: ANI slugfest over "advocacy ducks" essay
- Replies: 106
- Views: 10907
Re: ANI slugfest over "advocacy ducks" essay
Actually, in Wikiproject Catholicism, there is a very large amount of female editors. Really? Make sure you don't fall into something like this trap . Well, any percentage I could give would have to be an estimate. But in general, it's a lot more friendly and welcoming than say US Roads, military h...
- Wed Aug 05, 2015 4:06 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: ANI slugfest over "advocacy ducks" essay
- Replies: 106
- Views: 10907
Re: ANI slugfest over "advocacy ducks" essay
so they may have a reflexive, politically-motivated desire, that they're not even aware of because it's ingrained in their male privilege, of maintaining their patriarchal dominance in that topic area. Or any topic area, really. Wikipedia is a male-privilege haven. Actually, in Wikiproject Catholic...
- Fri Jul 24, 2015 7:20 am
- Forum: The Money Trail
- Topic: Villiage Pump Debate About Donating to WMF For New Article
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2112
Re: Villiage Pump Debate About Donating to WMF For New Artic
The responses from Timtrent (AKA FiddleFaddle) responses are very telling. @Nancy Sudheer:Why is a CEO inherently notable? What is there about him apart form his job that sets him apart form other men? We do not inherit notability form our work. Why are there sources "I am not aware of"? WP:BURDEN m...
- Sat Jul 18, 2015 7:27 am
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Fanatic: Commas must not be corrected by banned users
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1090
Fanatic: Commas must not be corrected by banned users
Sifting through AN/I regular BS, I happened to stumble upon this piece of work: [link]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User_is_following_me_and_reverting_for_no_reason[/link] Apparently, Winkelvi flew off the handle because Zoey Homes (a user they suspe...
- Wed Jul 08, 2015 10:07 pm
- Forum: Sexism
- Topic: The Ally Skills Workshop at Wikimania 2015
- Replies: 182
- Views: 23460
Re: The Ally Skills Workshop at Wikimania 2015
Good to see that the workshop coordinator who will be paid for the talk (right?) is spamming Wikipedians to boost attendance. I saw in the Ally Skills presentation that one thing conference coordinators should do to make women feel safe is not to schedule conferences in neighborhoods known to be un...
- Mon Jul 06, 2015 3:57 pm
- Forum: Blog Posts
- Topic: Victoria Taylor, Wikipedian
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2926
Re: Victoria Taylor, Wikipedian
Nary a comment, here nor there. What does this mean? You want some comments? Post it in r/wikiinaction and r/kotakuinaction Not sure about kotakuinaction, but we're banned from wikiinaction Really? https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiInAction/comments/3cawq0/big_news_victoria_taylor_used_to_edit_wikipedia...
- Mon Jul 06, 2015 3:46 pm
- Forum: Blog Posts
- Topic: Victoria Taylor, Wikipedian
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2926
Re: Victoria Taylor, Wikipedian
Not sure about kotakuinaction, but we're banned from wikiinactionVigilant wrote:You want some comments?thekohser wrote:Nary a comment, here nor there. What does this mean?
Post it in r/wikiinaction and r/kotakuinaction
- Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:09 am
- Forum: Web 2.0: The Emperor's New Clothes
- Topic: Reddit removes harassing subreddits
- Replies: 7
- Views: 517
Reddit removes harassing subreddits
Today, Reddit acted against a number of subreddits that it deemed were used for harassment ([link]http://www.reddit.com/r/announcements/comments/39bpam/removing_harassing_subreddits/[/link]). Promising to crack down in harassment on the site, they stated: It is not easy to balance these values, espe...
- Sat Jun 06, 2015 12:49 am
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Bad for professional mathematicians and amateurs alike
- Replies: 20
- Views: 1025
Re: Bad for professional mathematicians and amateurs alike
The same could be said for history articles.Poetlister wrote:I've heard it said that maths articles are generally very good on Wikipedia because only experts would touch them. This is of course bunkum.
Edit: Caps lock woes
- Fri Jun 05, 2015 12:51 am
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: McDoobAU93 and theme park edits
- Replies: 31
- Views: 1769
Re: McDoobAU93 and theme park edits
First edit was this: (linkhttps://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... d=79286185[/link]). If I had to make an early guess, I would say that they are probably just obsessed.
- Fri Jun 05, 2015 12:08 am
- Forum: Biographies (BLPs) & Privacy
- Topic: Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner
- Replies: 118
- Views: 6882
Re: Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner
Yep. Just as in the Manning episode, they're coming out of the woodwork in droves. Take a look at this particular block of crazy: Oppose - this is transphobic as heck. I note the arguments in its favor are often, if I may quote above, "gender (an immutable biological component)", which is purely fal...
- Thu Jun 04, 2015 8:39 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Compromised admin account?
- Replies: 31
- Views: 2009
Re: Compromised admin account?
Looks like he went off on a tizzy after he got publicly called out on AN/I ([link]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Unblock_of_JackTheVicar[/link]) Edit: Add link Oh my, there's Ironholds strutting around and dispensing of his wisdom. I'd like those five...
- Thu Jun 04, 2015 7:12 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Compromised admin account?
- Replies: 31
- Views: 2009
Re: Compromised admin account?
Looks like he went off on a tizzy after he got publicly called out on AN/I (linkhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... ckTheVicar[/link])
Edit: Add link
Edit: Add link
- Thu May 14, 2015 3:32 am
- Forum: Web 2.0: The Emperor's New Clothes
- Topic: DeviantArt and sexual fetishes
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2049
Re: DeviantArt and sexual fetishes
Well look who it is! Our dear friend http://russavia-x.deviantart.com,Russavia ! Saw that. It's probably someone's hoax account. Look at the "Favorites" -- try as I might, I just can't picture him wanting to be magically transformed into a bosomy chick. Ewwww. Wow. 33 pages, ugh. :sick: It also see...
- Wed May 13, 2015 5:30 pm
- Forum: Web 2.0: The Emperor's New Clothes
- Topic: DeviantArt and sexual fetishes
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2049
Re: DeviantArt and sexual fetishes
Well look who it is! Our dear friend Russavia!
- Wed May 13, 2015 4:21 am
- Forum: Web 2.0: The Emperor's New Clothes
- Topic: DeviantArt and sexual fetishes
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2049
Re: DeviantArt and sexual fetishes
Not a major story but amusing nonetheless: "The Fetish for Video Game Characters Trapped in Quicksand" Of course, this isn’t the only fetish artists are throwing women from video games into. Gamer-artists also fetishize about returning to the womb—a fetish called “unbirth." Princess Peach’s womb ...
- Thu May 07, 2015 6:44 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Wikipediocracy says "Jump!"; Wikipedia asks "How high?"
- Replies: 97
- Views: 3806
Re: Wikipediocracy says "Jump!"; Wikipedia asks "How high?"
(e-c)"influential"..."net positive"... Wow... That's sad that someone believes that. I'm sure that's what school teachers and administrators say about the bullies at their schools, too. And then BANG! a kid shoots up the school or takes their own life. Sad, it's only a matter of time before someone...
- Thu May 07, 2015 3:54 pm
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Wikipediocracy says "Jump!"; Wikipedia asks "How high?"
- Replies: 97
- Views: 3806
Re: Wikipediocracy says "Jump!"; Wikipedia asks "How high?"
And Coretheapple resurfaces once again to make a grand fool of himself:
Since this discussion was obviously started for the purpose of publicizing that website, I am sure a good laugh was had by all. Coretheapple (talk) 13:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- Wed May 06, 2015 3:46 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Hillary Clinton/Hillary Rodham Clinton
- Replies: 27
- Views: 1180
Re: Hilary Clinton/Hilary Rodham Clinton
Oh, crap. I can't believe I didn't catch that. Thanks to Zoloft for fixing it.Bielle wrote:Pssst: Hillary
- Thu Apr 30, 2015 8:44 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Call them "weasels"
- Replies: 7
- Views: 417
Re: Call them "weasels"
In the comments, Commons user Nemo bis = Federico Leva. What the hell is it about Italian Wikipedia? It produces far more than its share of completely egotistical, pathetic madmen. It was WMF Italia who was responsible for next year's Wikimania being held in beautiful Ensino Lario, was it not? Edit...
- Thu Apr 30, 2015 3:10 am
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Hillary Clinton/Hillary Rodham Clinton
- Replies: 27
- Views: 1180
Re: Hilary Clinton/Hilary Rodham Clinton
Update: It seems that the 3RR reports have both been closed by EdJohnston (T-C-L), but now it's been taken to ANI.
- Thu Apr 30, 2015 1:21 am
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Hillary Clinton/Hillary Rodham Clinton
- Replies: 27
- Views: 1180
Hillary Clinton/Hillary Rodham Clinton
Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton/April 2015 move request Today I had the misfortune to be involved in an idiotic edit war, all stemming from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AHillary_Rodham_Clinton%2FApril_2015_move_request&type=revision&diff=659948769&oldid=659943907,this comment by DD2...
- Wed Apr 15, 2015 7:12 am
- Forum: Governance
- Topic: Erik Moeller resigns from the WMF
- Replies: 130
- Views: 7817
Re: Erik Moeller resigns the wmf
Keyes is going to be walking on eggshells from now on, if he doesn't want his head on the chopping block. Is the idiot Kaldari still on the payroll as well? He seems like the perfect candidate to get the boot.Randy from Boise wrote:My dead pool pick: Oliver Keyes.
RfB
- Thu Apr 09, 2015 11:35 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Unpaid agendas in plain sight...
- Replies: 20
- Views: 1977
Re: Unpaid agendas in plain sight...
even if they have been caught spreading, eh, shall we say, less than truthful stories lots of times, they are still WP:RS on Wikipedia. So is The Guardian . WP:RS is certainly a can of worms. Correct me if i'm wrong, but aren't such eyesores like The Sun and the Daily Mail still considered RS?
- Thu Apr 09, 2015 8:16 pm
- Forum: Jimboland
- Topic: What is it that Jimbo can actually do?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1221
Re: What is it that Jimbo can actually do?
I agree. He really doesn't have any real use at all...
Honestly, I think that the WMF should have taken his special statuses away a long time ago.
Honestly, I think that the WMF should have taken his special statuses away a long time ago.
- Wed Apr 01, 2015 10:36 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Creative Vandalism
- Replies: 464
- Views: 141803
Re: Creative Vandalism
And now at RFAR... Sigh https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests&oldid=647673226#Requests_for_arbitration Good lord! The idiocy! I think I have to go wash my eyes out now. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Banning_Policy_II It looks like most of the Arbs have made...
- Wed Apr 01, 2015 8:17 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Creative Vandalism
- Replies: 464
- Views: 141803
- Tue Mar 31, 2015 1:02 am
- Forum: Web 2.0: The Emperor's New Clothes
- Topic: Oopsie, Reddit got a subpoena!
- Replies: 2
- Views: 292
Re: Oopsie, Reddit got a subpoena!
Ha ha ha! Hilarious! Hopefully it serves as a sobering wake-up call to those dummies. They still haven't cleaned up from the infamous and disgusting "Fappening" incident (creepy subreddits like this still exist).
- Mon Mar 23, 2015 7:27 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: A little insight from Reddit: obsessive editing
- Replies: 6
- Views: 373
Re: A little insight from Reddit: obsessive editing
Thanks to Zoloft for correcting my error (posted from my phone, sorry).
- Mon Mar 23, 2015 3:14 am
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: A little insight from Reddit: obsessive editing
- Replies: 6
- Views: 373
A little insight from Reddit: obsessive editing
I was browsing Reddit when I came across this comment on Wikipedia: http://www.reddit.com/r/CrusaderKings/comments/2zwexl/do_you_knnow_why_is_wiki_obsessed_with_ckii_stuff/cpmyvor,Do you knnow why is wiki obsessed with CKII stuff? Front page DYK again. Specifically, the second comment struck me as s...
- Fri Mar 13, 2015 9:32 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Crap images
- Replies: 16
- Views: 696
Re: Crap images
Ah, this reminds me of a favorite pastime. Here are the steps:
1) Go to Commons
2) Press "random file" and pray you don't hit porn
3) Look up a possible corresponding article on Wikipedia
4) Insert file into article
5) Repeat until satisfied
1) Go to Commons
2) Press "random file" and pray you don't hit porn
3) Look up a possible corresponding article on Wikipedia
4) Insert file into article
5) Repeat until satisfied
- Fri Mar 06, 2015 8:58 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia and Wikimedia Projects - General Discussion
- Topic: Wikipedia censored my constructive edit
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1871
Re: Wikipedia censored my constructive edit
Well, I think Shalom has proven that they did make some constructive edits. However... that doesn't justify the pure trolling that has happened since, and they're certainly not on topics that make you irreplaceable . That's not to say articles I've written are generally less obscure, but then, I'm ...