Why this Site?

  • Our Mission:
  • We exist to shine the light of scrutiny into the dark crevices of Wikipedia and its related projects; to examine the corruption there, along with its structural flaws; and to inoculate the unsuspecting public against the torrent of misinformation, defamation, and general nonsense that issues forth from one of the world’s most frequently visited websites, the “encyclopedia that anyone can edit.”
  • How you can participate:
  •  Visit the Wikipediocracy Forum, a candid exchange of views between Wikipedia editors, administrators, critics, proponents, and the general public.
  • 'Like' our Wikipediocracy page on Facebook.
  •  Follow Wikipediocracy on Twitter!

Press Releases

  • Please click here for recent Wikipediocracy press releases.

Google Search

Wikipedia Loves (Stolen) Art

By Hemia U. Chenia (and the Wikipediocracy Blog Staff)

Christian Rosa (courtesy of Wikimedia Commons; image uploaded by User:Panghea)

In 2016 a Wikipedia entry for contemporary artist Christian Rosa was created by a new user called Panghea. It was quickly nominated for deletion, but the discussion resulted in “no consensus,” so the article remained. Panghea sporadically updated Rosa’s page over the next few years, making no edits to any other article, and Rosa’s art was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons by Panghea, who claimed it was their “own work.”Born in Brazil in 1982, Rosa’s fame reached its zenith in 2014 when one of his paintings sold at Christie’s in New York for $209,000. His star soon dimmed, however, and a similar artwork made only $30,000 a year later.In January 2021, Artnet News claimed Rosa stole a partially completed painting from fellow artist Raymond Pettibon. Rosa allegedly forged the unfinished part and consigned it to the secondary art market as the owner. A subsequent Artnet exposé suggested that Rosa had stolen and forged multiple paintings from Pettibon’s workshop.An unregistered user added these allegations to Rosa’s Wikipedia article, cited to Artnet. Less than two hours later though, Panghea swooped in and removed them entirely, leaving a misleading comment of “minor edit.”The allegations eventually found their way back into Rosa’s article several months later, courtesy of occasional editor Forsooth1234. Panghea again removed all mention of the scandal, with another misleading edit summary: “Minor edit + incl. sculptures.” The claims were then added back in again by an anonymous IP editor and Forsooth1234, but were repeatedly removed by Panghea, who claimed the additions were “libelous.” That started an edit war that resulted in the article being temporarily

…continue reading Wikipedia Loves (Stolen) Art

The Nicholas Alahverdian Story, Part Three

A case study in Wikipedia failure

by Dahlia Raven (see also: Part One, Part Two, Epilogue)

If you look at the current version (at the time this blog entry was written) of Wikipedia’s Nicholas Alahverdian article, you will see it includes a picture of a white guy with a beard. That is where the story goes from a case of sockpuppetry and promotional editing to something weirder, because that is not a picture of Nicholas Alahverdian.

That picture is of Jonathan Finer, former Chief of Staff and Director of Policy Planning at the U.S. Department of State. It appears to have been taken from the “Leadership” page at the Foreign Policy for America website, flipped horizontally, edited slightly, and then uploaded to Wikimedia Commons in October 2017. The uploader gave it a description which reads, “Nicholas Alahverdian sits for a portrait in March 2017.”

[Editor’s note, 1/31/2021: This image has since been deleted from Commons.]

Well… that’s strange

It was Wikipedia editor and administrator Nihonjoe who noticed that the picture was not Alahverdian. They removed the picture (“rm photo with dubious claim of being the subject”) and nominated it for deletion on Commons. And then it went from weird to weirder. Norsk81, the uploader in 2017, returned to claim that it was indeed Alahverdian, even though it didn’t look like him.

As the photographer working on assignment I took this photo of Nic (the subject) at the statehouse in Providence RI. Nihonjoe gave ten year old photos for proof, and the photo I shot was seven years more recent. I am unsure how to respond other than I know who I photographed in 3/2017 and it was definitely him. Norsk81 (talk) 01:22, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Pointing out a few things would not be wrong

…continue reading The Nicholas Alahverdian Story, Part Three

The Nicholas Alahverdian Story, Part Two

A case study in Wikipedia failure

by Dahlia Raven (see also: Part One; Part Three; Epilogue)

Why does Nicholas Alahverdian have a Wikipedia entry at all?

The simple answer is that an editor named Tkfy7cf created it. Not as “Nicholas Alahverdian,” but as “Nicholas Alahverdian I” (note the “I”). It was started on 14 November 2019, fully formed and including a photograph. On Wikipedia, that in itself is usually considered suspicious, so it was only a matter of minutes before it was moved to the correct title, and then immediately nominated for deletion.

The deletion discussion was closed with a very lukewarm keep:

The result was keep. I see that there are concerns about sockpuppetry in this discussion, but on the substance it seems like the various GNG-based claims of notability have been only weakly contested even if the “Harvard University alumnus” notability claim has not gained much acceptance. The BLP1E point is somewhat less clear but it hasn’t received enough support to make a deletion consensus.

There will very likely be another deletion discussion and another chance to debate the merits of Alahverdian’s article, but let’s examine one of the non-sockpuppet comments, if only because it’s so terribly misguided:

Keep. He was also an author who attended Harvard University He wrote: Dreading and Hoping All He was also published in the Providence Journal. Seems to have non-trivial coverage. Quebec Tribune, and again Quebec News Tribune. My opinion is non-trivial SIGCOV exists. It is concentrated on the East coast, New England, but that is not a concern for our guidelines. Lightburst (talk) 21:42, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Alahverdian is an author; a self-published author.He did attend Harvard, and was “administratively withdrawn,” as covered in Part One of this series.He was published in the Providence Journal. It was

…continue reading The Nicholas Alahverdian Story, Part Two