Why this Site?

  • Our Mission:
  • We exist to shine the light of scrutiny into the dark crevices of Wikipedia and its related projects; to examine the corruption there, along with its structural flaws; and to inoculate the unsuspecting public against the torrent of misinformation, defamation, and general nonsense that issues forth from one of the world’s most frequently visited websites, the “encyclopedia that anyone can edit.”
  • How you can participate:
  •  Visit the Wikipediocracy Forum, a candid exchange of views between Wikipedia editors, administrators, critics, proponents, and the general public.
  • 'Like' our Wikipediocracy page on Facebook.
  •  Follow Wikipediocracy on Twitter!

Press Releases

  • Please click here for recent Wikipediocracy press releases.

Last Night I Dreamt Somebody Blocked Me

By Jake S.

Whenever there’s a mass shooting, especially in the gun-crazy United States, there inevitably follows a lengthy blame-assignment period in which everyone wants to lay the tragedy at the feet of whatever group they ultimately deem responsible, which often doesn’t include the actual shooter. The Isla Vista shootings of May 25, which left 7 people dead – including the murderer, Elliot Rodger – are no exception. In addition to the usual suspects (parents, school administrators, therapists, the media, the gun culture, Hollywood, and internet pornography), this case reveals a vast hive of scum and villainy, both online and off, that features “pickup artists,” bodybuilders, people who hate pickup artists (and bodybuilders), racists, misogynists, the Mega Millions Lottery, and perhaps even Justin Bieber. (We’ll get to him momentarily.)

.

Naturally I looked for a way to blame Wikipedia, too, but in the end, I just couldn’t do it. Perhaps my best-known aphorism is “Wikipedia is a revenge platform,” and it was in this case, but it also wasn’t enough. Elliot Rodger half-heartedly tried, and utterly failed, to satisfy his desire for payback against the so-called “manosphere” by Wikipedia editing alone, and the rest, you already know. So I’m writing this more as a “cautionary tale”; do with it what you will.

The Boy With The Thorn In His Side

Rodger had a Wikipedia account, “ElliotR1,” created on Feb. 12, 2013, which he initially used to remove this image of the winner of a wrestling match in Nuba from the article about his grandfather, George Rodger, a famous photographer. At the time, he explained that the photograph was “too silly and inappropriate for wikipedia” and that “people might mistake it for a picture of the photographer.” We now know that Elliot Rodger was not especially fond of black men, or Asian men, or any other men for that matter, and his reasons for wanting the photograph removed probably had as much to do with his racist sense of personal aesthetics as with the fact that the photograph actually is somewhat silly.

A few hours later, Rodger – who, it should be noted, didn’t like to be reminded that other people were busy having sex that didn’t involve him – tried to remove sexually explicit photographs from the articles on Wikipedia’s Footjob and Fellatio articles, stating in an edit summary that the photographs were “inappropriate for Wikipedia.” Clearly, Rodger was still under the common misapprehension that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, as opposed to a giant game-driven anti-cultural free-for-all dramafest masquerading as one. Apparently he also believed that the photographs depicted the uploader himself, leading him to ask, “Did you take these pictures? Wikipedia is not a place for you to flaunt your life.” (Another misapprehension; that’s precisely what Wikipedia is.)

In any event, the removals were quickly reverted. Rodger was given the benefit of the doubt by the admins, but in a final moment of frustration over his failure to make Wikipedia look the way he preferred, Rodger did something that’s often done by frustrated newbies just before they give up altogether: he “vandalized.” Specifically, he blanked the article on then-teenage Canadian pop superstar Justin Bieber.

Heaven Knows I’m Miserable Now

At this point, Rodger’s “user trajectory” on Wikipedia was really quite common, and certainly no worse or more unusual than those of other recent spree shooters and murderers who edited Wikipedia, such as Breivik, Lanza, Bedell and Magnotta. He made a few edits out of self-interest, which were reverted, but the ease by which he could change the world’s largest encyclopedia juiced his innate narcissism, leading him to make more edits, only this time to articles that were fundamental to Wikipedia’s mission. When those were reverted as well, he got upset, blanked a popular page, and left the site. Though the Bieber article was almost instantaneously restored by Wikipedia’s “Cluebot,” an automated vandal-reversion program, Rodger was blocked for a week for the act of page-blanking. Rodger might not have noticed the block, but since he didn’t note it in his manifesto, we’ll probably never know. (Regardless, could anyone really be blamed for blanking the Bieber page? All of us, including Bieber himself, have probably wanted to do it at some time or other.)

.

The next part of the story involves male model Simon Nessman and an Australian bodybuilder named Aziz “Zyzz” Shavershian. The Russian-born Shavershian had developed an unusually ardent online following, both for the way he had “sculpted” his body and for the way he then publicly reveled in his own over-the-top personal narcissism. His fame only increased in 2011 when he died of a heart attack, almost certainly (but not officially) due to his having ingested huge amounts of steroids.

Unfortunately, our investigation of this part of the story is hampered by the fact that many of the forums frequented by Rodger have since been scrubbed of related content by terrified site owners and administrators. The one most often cited, PUAHate.com, has been taken down completely, though Google caches of some threads still exist at the time of this writing. Because of these caches we know that forum discussions of Nessman and Shavershian did take place, and we also know that Rodger had an extremely low opinion of both of them as undeserving “Alphas” and “beast-men” – in line with his belief that women only find such men attractive because they (i.e., women) are “less evolved” and unable to see past surface appearances.

Back to the Old House

In the mid-afternoon of July 20, 2013, Elliot Rodger returned to Wikipedia and made two edits. The first was to remove the “infobox” on Nessman’s article, thus effectively removing the photograph of Nessman. He then went to the Shavershian article and removed just the image from his infobox. (It might be noted here that in the intervening three months, Wikipedia had implemented its new “VisualEditor” software, which may have caused Rodger to remove Nessman’s entire infobox inadvertently when he only meant to remove the photo.) Four hours later, at 7:49 PM local time, Rodger made three more edits in quick succession – each of which removed a list-item mention of Shavershian from other articles (Eastwood, New South Wales; Marist College Eastwood; and List of University of Western Sydney people).

The Nessman edit had been reverted within 14 minutes, so it seems likely that Rodger would have noticed it. However, the subsequent edits involving Shavershian were not reverted until 9 hours later, and at 7:16 AM local time, Rodger was finally blocked indefinitely for “unexplained removals of content” – and this time he was not given the benefit of the doubt, because the blocking admin would have readily seen Rodger’s blanking of the Bieber article and concluded that Rodger was little more than a common “vandal.”

But assuming we’re to take Rodger’s account of that evening’s events (http://www.scribd.com/doc/225936731/Untitled) as accurate, by the time these things happened he had already left his apartment to give the women of Isla Vista and UC Santa Barbara “one last chance” to have sex with him before finally committing himself to a course that would ultimately lead to mass murder:

In July, I spent a lot of time exercising in my room in a final effort to appear as attractive as possible to girls. I proposed that after two weeks of rigorous exercising, I will try my hardest to go out in Isla Vista and do everything I can to meet a girl and lose my virginity. It had been a long time since I went out to Isla Vista by myself, but I knew that I had to do it. I had nothing to lose, and my whole life was on the line. Before would set the definite decision to plan the Day of Retribution, I wanted to give women and humanity one more chance to accept me and give me a chance to have a pleasurable youth. I resolved that if I go out to Isla Vista for this final time, and I still end up going back to my room as a lonely virgin, I will have no choice but to plan my Retribution. I even attended college at SBCC again. I signed up for a summer sociology class and attended it for a week, before dropping it out of the familiar frustration of girls talking to other boys instead of me.This last ditch effort of desperation to once again try to live an enjoyable college life in Isla Vista came to an ultimate and devastating culmination on Saturday night, July 20th, just a few days before my 22nd Birthday. It was the day that I decided to go out in Isla Vista in an attempt to lose my virginity before I turned 22. That was the only thing that could have saved me. I was giving the female gender one last chance to provide me with the pleasures I deserved from them.

In other words, literally minutes after his half-hearted attempt to abnegate Aziz Shavershian’s presence on Wikipedia, Rodger went out, crashed a house party on Del Playa Street, was ignored by numerous women, tried to push several of the women off a second-story ledge, and finally was thrown off the ledge himself, breaking his leg in the fall. He claims to have spent the next day in hospital having the leg repaired, so he might not have learned of his Wikipedia account being blocked until several days later.

Paint a Vulgar Picture

But there’s no mention of Rodger’s July 20 Wikipedia activity in his “manifesto” whatsoever. He mentions PUAHate, and of course Youtube, but not Wikipedia. And he never actually explains why he chose that particular day to give the female gender “one last chance.”

Looking at this in perspective, Elliot Rodger wrote a lengthy “manifesto” telling the world in excruciating detail that he was a hopeless loser, hated himself and everyone else, couldn’t get laid literally to save his life, and intended to kill people because of it. Every nasty private thought, every petty humiliation, every grotesque fantasy seemingly made it into the story of his horrible, psychosis-ridden life – but he couldn’t bring himself to admit that he’d edited Wikipedia. That one thing, and perhaps that thing alone, was apparently just too shameful for anyone else to know about.

Well I Wonder

Speaking only for myself, what bothers me the most about this story is that I can’t help liking Wikipedia a little more now than I did before. After all, Wikipedia tried. It beckoned to Rodger, as if to say “don’t fret, tortured soul; you can get your cheap, anonymous revenge here with us, and all we’ll do is revert your edits and block your account – and who knows, we might not even do that!” True, it wasn’t enough for Rodger, but could it have been enough for other would-be mass murderers in the past? Could Wikipedia have actually helped – indirectly, unintentionally, and in cases that might never have actually happened – to save lives?

Then again, maybe the hollow, empty feeling Rodger must have experienced after making those Wikipedia edits, knowing they would quickly be reverted and have no real-world effect on the article subjects anyway, only exacerbated his feelings of powerlessness and helpless rage.

We’ll probably never know.

 

Image credits: Flickr/boltron-, Flickr/toiletbowl martini, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic

9 comments to Last Night I Dreamt Somebody Blocked Me

  • eb

    I have to admit that I find this a bit disappointing. Seven people died, and you relate that to a series of innocuous edits on Wikipedia that were seemingly so unimportant that they didn’t even make it into his manifesto. To then take the omission, and interpret it as “he couldn’t bring himself to admit that he’d edited Wikipedia” is not just a stretch, but offensive. Sometimes Wikipediocracy makes extremely valuable points. Clearly, sometimes it does not.

    • Wikipediocracy looks forward to your own blog submission, “eb”, since you are obviously a perfectionist in the craft of news writing.

      • eb

        I make no such claims. Let’s put this another way. I note that in his manifesto there was no mention of McDonalds. I think we can safely assume that he ate there. Based on the argument provided above, I guess we must also assume that he was so ashamed of eating at McDonalds that he could not bring himself to mention it in his manifesto. Maybe if he’d been encouraged to spend more time at McDonalds, even been allowed to abuse the service staff a bit more, he could have taken out his frustrations and lives would have been saved. Or maybe the hollow feeling of eating a Big Mac helped drive him to commit those murders.

        It is a bad argument. To say that not mentioning something equates to being ashamed to reveal it is very poor. To say that there is any chance that taking out frustrations through vandalism on Wikipedia could save lives is no more convincing, and to insinuate that blocking him might have helped lead to seven deaths is a massive stretch. There’s solid, valuable criticism coming out of this site which Wikipedia needs to hear. But in this case the argument is not worth making.

  • Stephen

    The user’s talk page and block log both show that he was blocked for a week for the page blanking.

  • Kiefer.Wolfowitz

    If only Elliot Rodger could have read the threads mentioning WMF Wikipedian-in-Residence at the University of California, Kevin Gorman, and their pictures and video, then Rodger need not have felt so inadequate.

  • metasonix

    “Looking at this in perspective, Elliot Rodger wrote a lengthy “manifesto” telling the world in excruciating detail that he was a hopeless loser, hated himself and everyone else, couldn’t get laid literally to save his life, and intended to kill people because of it. Every nasty private thought, every petty humiliation, every grotesque fantasy seemingly made it into the story of his horrible, psychosis-ridden life – but he couldn’t bring himself to admit that he’d edited Wikipedia. That one thing, and perhaps that thing alone, was apparently just too shameful for anyone else to know about.”

    Snappy.

  • Wikipedia promotes itself as the repository of all human knowledge. Are there any would-be alpha males and narcissists out there who don’t feel drawn to it? So they begin editing it and of course many soon find themselves in trouble there. Inevitably they get blocked, thus joining the ranks of those very few human beings not acceptable to Wikipedia. Naturally they will try to edit anyway using spurious accounts, so they are slapped down again and again and again. Is there a worse environment for these disturbed individuals? There are environments that will invite them in and there are environments that will slap them down but not many environments that will do both and none that will do it with that unique blend of righteousness and thuggery that makes Wikipedia a shining example of man’s inhumanity to man.

    But troubled individuals are just the tip of the iceberg. Hundreds if not thousands of Wikipedians spend most of their waking hours there, drawn ever deeper into the delusion that they are part of a real community dedicated to knowledge. This organization preys on the weak and vulnerable. They are its bread and butter, its cannon fodder. Let’s add the admins themselves to the list of victims. What other organisation gives an anonymous group the power to decide who can and can’t contribute to the sum of human knowledge? It is a deranged model for human behaviour.

    Of course Wikipedia can’t be held responsible for Eliot Rodger’s tragic actions. The real villain is a world that thinks Wikipedia is a good idea. It is a world that accepts anonymity as the face of human labour. It is a world that learns how to cope with vandalism as criminal behaviour rather than as a symptom of social alienation. They have become very good at removing scrawl from public spaces.

    And what do we get in return for all this madness? We get an encyclopaedia nobody can rely on. It services the idle curiosity of people who don’t consider real research necessary. That is like a power plant that produces little more than pollution. Just what the world needs!

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>